After hearing this, Liu Chen couldn't help but shake his head. This professor is indeed a talented man. He has spent so much time on these classics. It seems that he is also an American who is very interested in China. It is rare to study such a profound and profound way. When he was pronounced just now, he clearly said the word "tiao". I'm afraid that even Chinese people cannot read it accurately except for the old professors in the Chinese department.

Many people know that if Zi is not a fish, how can I know the joy of fish? Especially many debates or flirting and arguments like to use this sentence, but few people know that there are sharp thinking below. If Zi is not a fish, how can I know that I don’t know the joy of fish?

Zach grabbed Liu Chen excitedly and shouted, "What does it mean, what does it mean? Is the tongue twister?"

You're very happy to see those fish.

How do you know that fish are happy if you are not a fish?

You are not me, how do you know I don’t know how happy fish is?

I don't know you, just like you don't know fish.

Your initial question was to ask me if I already knew the joy of fish.

Liu Chen gave him a rough explanation and thought to himself, isn’t this the most popular argument among the ancients? Even the peddlers and pawns can say a few famous quotes.

Zach was very excited when he heard this. He slapped Liu Chen's thigh and shouted: "It's thought-provoking and philosophical. This is the most profound idea of ​​programming. It inspires me a lot. It seems that I think I should read more Chinese classics."

Liu Chen thought secretly that the logic here is really similar to programming calls, especially the system program, and he couldn't help but be stunned and thought about it carefully.

As a professor at the Business School, Memphis actually played the role of the Chinese ancient Chinese teacher. Just after he finished these two passages, a student suddenly stood up and said loudly: "Is the professor here to introduce us to these boring and useless Chinese ancient Chinese culture?"

At Harvard, there are many scenes of challenging authority. Anyone who dares to hold a lecture at Sanders Theater must be prepared to be interrupted and asked questions at will. Students will never take into account the professor's face. Therefore, without the diamond, ordinary people really dare not come to hold a lecture, otherwise they will have to be embarrassed.

The famous Asimoglu was first taught here "Why the Country Failed" and was interrupted four times in just one hour. A scholar who attended the audience also had a tit-for-tat debate with him.

Such a respectable authority, I was sweating all over after a class. I don’t know if it was because of the hot weather or because of the baking of this atmosphere.

This kind of scene is usually more intense in economics lectures, and there are too many students who care about economy at Harvard.

Although it was the first time I came to listen to a lecture, Liu Chen still knew about it. He didn't expect that Memphis was interrupted shortly after the opening. However, he was obviously prepared and did not feel panic at all. He responded easily: "China is unique and unique in the entire history of human development. It cannot be studied with any theory. If we want to explore the root cause, it is necessary to trace the root cause. The two short stories I have mentioned are just to help everyone understand."

The questioner just asked was a white boy with curly blonde hair and looked a little weak, but the expression on his face was very arrogant. He clenched his fists and waved his arms and said loudly: "Most of the philosophical thoughts of China originated from the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. Most of the idioms and fables were formed in the era of separatist rule of the Three Kingdoms in the late Han Dynasty. There have been no progress in the past two thousand years. There have been many incidents of burning books and burying scholars. In the end, they all followed a bunch of strange routines and sought to be officials. It was not until eighty years ago that China was in chaos, and some philosophical thoughts were whining without illness. I really can't see what the professor said about these unnutritional stories? I can't see what the professor's significance is when he analyzes the cases of Chinese enterprises? It's just that he adopts a monopoly of power. He spent precious time here not to listen to these, otherwise wouldn't it be better to read the Bible and pray?"
Chapter completed!