Of course, we cannot deny that whether it is the new king or the previous kings, they do love the common people from the bottom of their hearts, but what they love is not the common people, but the food that the common people can create.

and other resources, but it can also be said that it just loves the common people.

This is the same as what we all say about love in today's era. Whether it is a man or a woman, they just like the other person's social status or wealth from the bottom of their hearts. It can also be said that

What women like is a man as we humans fictionally define it, not a man as stated in biology or the laws of nature. At this point, I have foolishly concluded that women’s love for us men is a lie!

On the contrary, our men's love for women is real, no matter from our sociological point of view, from the point of view of biology or even the laws of nature.

Now that we have said this, it is not difficult to understand that the love of the ancestors and kings for the common people can be said to be a lie, or it can be said to be true. But regardless of whether these are true or lies, after all, there is no doubt that the city-state needs the city lord. We

It is enough to understand this, because the city lord is actually the core factor in building a city-state. The city lord is the god that all people believe in, so if there is a problem with the city lord, there will be resistance.

It is not difficult to understand after our analysis at this point. In fact, there are many factors that lead to resistance. In addition to external factors, there are also factors such as the expansion of the city lord's own desires.

Now that we have all talked about it, we have to talk about it together. Why are the inheritance of city lords or clan leaders in our ancestors' era generally dominated by men? And in more cultural systems, there does not seem to be any respect for women.

They don’t pay much attention to it, but they attach great importance to men. This idea is still relatively popular until our modern day, so I have done some analysis myself, and let’s discuss it together:

First of all, let’s talk about, what are the benefits of being a man? We can find from countless historical documents that since the development of agriculture by our Homo sapiens ancestors, in most cases it has been a patriarchal society that values ​​boys over girls.

In the culture of this society, what is the definition of men and women? Men always have a sense of superiority anyway, and in this patriarchal society and culture, boys are generally educated to be masculine men, while women should

She has a feminine look, but as long as someone crosses this concept, punishment will follow.

For example, if a man becomes feminine or dresses in beautiful and revealing clothes, all of us will say that this man is crazy and will definitely verbally attack him. Or, in other words, there is a woman who dresses like

Men, then we will also accuse her, thinking that she is a tomboy or something, or simply say that she cannot get married. But if all of this is based on the laws of nature, everything that can happen is reasonable, then? Do we

It can be judged that this concept is what we imagined and then finalized. We are all supervising each other. Whoever crosses the boundary is at fault. In any case, we ignore the rationality of the laws of nature.

But let’s turn it around and say that if men and women actually abide by these rules that we imagine and define, the rewards for men and women are different. In our fictional concept, masculinity is often valued more than femininity, so in

Masculine role models in society always receive more rewards than feminine representatives, and feminine women receive resources, such as knowledge inheritance, money and rights, and even the freedom to move, which are obviously inferior to masculine men.

, so this gives me the feeling that this gender almost has a sense of competition.

Indeed, if we analyze it from our modern perspective, many women in history have indeed gained rights, such as Cleopatra in ancient times, Queen Elizabeth I of England, and even our Chinese

Cixi, but it is not difficult for us to find that even though these women had great power, the soldiers, judges, commanders, and even those who took the imperial examinations in China at that time, even wrote poetry, literature, philosophy, doctors, scientific research, etc.

Almost everything is done by men.

Therefore, this concept of patriarchal society has been driving the historical process of our mankind, and it has endured for a long time. What is even more outrageous is that women have rights only infrequently. In fact, men have been driving the entire history, and even to this day we humans

Society has entered the civilized era, but if we study the laws of the Pharaohs in Egypt, the laws of Greece, or the laws of ancient Rome or even Japan, or study the laws of Turkey or even the United Kingdom, etc., we have always recognized that they believe that real men

We are the only ones who respect me.

Perhaps it is because this concept of patriarchy is so common that throughout the development of our human history, almost everyone believes that men’s masculinity is stronger than women’s femininity, right?

Of course, there are other reasons. For example, many people believe that men are actually stronger than women. This can be said that men have more developed muscles than women, so planting wheat and the like are men's work. After all, in ancient times, it was generally manual labor. So far, it can be said

It is men who indirectly control food production, which translates into an influence in society.

But this doesn’t make sense. Why do I think this doesn’t make sense? Because if men are stronger than women in terms of their muscles, then the muscles of those who are officials are obviously not as good as those of civilians, and they are not even as good as some women.

But why do men like them without muscles have rights? Isn't it strange?

Because in the animal world, being king depends purely on muscle, just like the Lion King, or the Deer King, etc. Whoever is stronger and whoever has more muscles can defeat everyone is the king. But there are also

Another phenomenon, such as chimpanzees, the king among them is often not the strongest, he may be a very old man. If other strong chimpanzees want to kill this very old man, in fact, this old man does not do it himself.

Instead, he commands other strong chimpanzees and then kills his own enemies.

So this comes back to our strange problem. In society, people who generally don’t have muscles control people who have stronger muscles. So? We say that what makes us men better than women is that muscles are strength, so women are better than us men.

It seems to be inferior, which is unjustifiable.

Then let’s understand it again. Many theories say that we men are superior to women. This is not because we men are muscular or more powerful, but because we men are creatures that have developed over the past countless years.

Among them, they have violent tendencies and even aggressive tendencies, which are obviously greater than women. Although women can also be angry, or have thoughts of hatred, greed, and bullying, we men seem to be more willing to put these thoughts into action.

Perhaps it is because of the small differences between us men and women that all wars in human history are caused by us men. Therefore, almost all soldiers, generals, and even kings are men. But we must know that we men

Generally speaking, women are not very good at comforting people, and they cannot be all-round. On the contrary, women know how to comfort people, look at problems from different angles, and can even be all-round. If we put it this way, then a person who leads a war, or is suitable to be a king,

It should be a woman, and then lead a group of people with strong limbs and easy temper to fight. Wouldn't it be better to start this way? But this is just our imagination, but the reality is that we men still dominate everything.

Then, from a biological point of view, men’s genes are different from women’s, because from ancient times to modern times, if men want to get a partner, they usually have to defeat many opponents. For example, to defeat an opponent in ancient times is to defeat the opponent.

Killing, and our modern times say that defeating the opponent depends on who has the money, which is probably the case. But this process also indicates that only the genes of men who are very aggressive, ambitious, and even competitive can be passed on.

, so women generally give birth to children who are aggressive, ambitious, etc. Even after a man has his own children, he still needs to fight endlessly with more people. After all, he has to support his wife and children.

.

But from this aspect, it seems that women can find a man to have children easily, and it is not a big problem at all, so there is almost no need to fight. Therefore, women have become feminine. Is this the reason? Because

Women rarely need to fight in their lives, so they are less ambitious or even aggressive?

Therefore, men are aggressive, competitive, and ambitious, while women tend to seek good luck, avoid bad luck, and raise children throughout their lives, so that they feel satisfied in this life.

But the problem doesn’t seem to be like this, because if aggressiveness is the dominant role in society, then women’s femininity is because they need help, so they need to rely on others in the process of getting help, so

Women need to develop social skills and learn how to cooperate or comfort each other.

Sorry everyone, I am a bit confused at the moment, so I finally made a foolish judgment: men have a higher social status than women because they are stronger at the beginning, and even have these aggressive and ambitious thoughts, and they are also willing to fight for these things.

Thoughts are turned into actions. But I don’t judge that women do not have this kind of character, because according to the laws of nature, women fully possess all these conditions and possibilities. It may be that women do not do this due to various factors.

?So that ultimately led to a patriarchal society.

Then we talked so much and continued to return to our previous topic. Now we also understand why city lords are generally men, right? Now that we understand this, we also indirectly know that we men are actually in the process of evolution.

Among them, they have the thoughts of being ambitious, aggressive, and even aggressive and bullying, and they will also act on them. At this point, this new city-state has a new city lord, and it is definitely not safe, because some problems are simply
Chapter completed!