Ignoring Sugiyama who was subdued on the ground, Kousei took out a black and white photo from his backpack and placed it vertically on the plaintiff's table.

Now there is only one final step, the truth about the case back then.

But this step seems a bit difficult...

Because up to now, all of Kousheng's actions are consistent with those of a lawyer and a public figure.

It is indeed possible to end the case just like this. After going out, according to Sugiyama's idea lying on the ground, he waved handsomely to the camera and said elegantly, "I am a lawyer."

Really handsome.

Starting from tomorrow, although I won’t be able to compete with Kudo Shinichi, I will be surrounded by a group of little fans.

...

"Plaintiff's lawyer, if you have no other lawsuits to elaborate on, we will enter the trial phase."

It seemed like he was telling Koong Sheng to end it like this.

It ends like this, which is best for everyone.

The Metropolitan Police only focused on the funds, and the trial team did not want to go to so much trouble and transfer from economic crimes to criminal crimes.

Kousei is still the so-called righteous partner.

But if you open your mouth, it will no longer be for the public's rights and interests, but will be transformed into...

An avenger of a dead girl, a selfish hypocrite.

Just let it go... It's over here... The prisoner has been punished... The girl has passed away and cannot be resurrected...

Mr. Gongsheng sighed.

Pick up the third document and stand up from your position.

"Reply to the presiding judge, judge, I will represent our plaintiff, Ms. Minako, to overturn the case of suicide in the ballet studio three years ago, and launch a lawsuit against Yamada and Sugiyama in front of me."

This time, we really want to start overturning the case.

Moreover, it was a case from three years ago, a case in which all clues had disappeared.

"Plaintiff's lawyer, one last reminder, do you insist on continuing the appeal?"

"If it stops now, we can end it and start the final trial."

Because if the subsequent appeal fails, Gong Sheng will also be jointly and severally liable.

Don’t forget that at this moment, Kousheng’s application is a special case court, which is itself an unfair court against Kousheng.

Failure means total destruction.

"I will continue to appeal and reply to the presiding judge and judge."

The black-and-white photo that Kousei placed on the plaintiff's desk showed a cute girl of eleven or two years old, probably around the same age as Ayumi Yoshida.

But the girl was murdered by the two people in front of her out of selfish interests.

Perhaps, he is unable to become a famous detective like Kudo Shinichi, and Kousei's behavior at this moment can be regarded as selfish.

"Okay, plaintiff, you can continue to complain, and the defendant's lawyer can rebut based on the issues raised by the other party."

The presiding judge prompted the lawyer in the dock.

With Mumu Shisan's shoulders pressed down, the defendant's lawyer briefly forgot that it was now the trial stage.

No, I must have never seen such a "lawyer" act so recklessly before!

The Metropolitan Police Department intervened in the special case trial process, and now they actually want to review the case from three years ago.

What kind of bastard behavior is this.

"Yes, I am the defendant's lawyer, and I will respect the fairness of Neon Law and safeguard the legal rights and interests of our client!"

Since it was the plaintiff's girl's part, the defendant's lawyer felt that he still had a possibility.

At least in this place, we can win back the victory.

"Okay, plaintiff's lawyer, start your complaint."

The presiding judge looked at Koong Sheng again, indicating that the other party could start.

Section for girls.

Gongsheng bowed slightly as a final thank you.

At any point in the process, if the presiding judge is different and the case continues, it will be death.

The situation is already the worst and it won't get any worse...

Now that the situation has improved, Kousei is inexplicably flustered.

On the surface, he still has a smile like the rising sun, and his eyes are shining brightly.

"The plaintiff's lawsuit is as follows:..."

On a certain day three years ago, our plaintiff, Mochizuki Minako, was found dead in the ballet room of Acupido Elementary School. The manner of Mochizuki Minako's death was hanging.

Minako Mochizuki was 1.2 meters tall. According to the on-site survey, it was found that the distance between the roof beam and the ground was four meters, a distance that even an adult's hand could not reach. It was even more impossible for the girl to commit suicide.

And follow-up investigation revealed that three years ago, the key to the ballet studio was kept by Mr. Shimoda.

At the same time, it was discovered that the second case prop was a three-meter tool ladder that went up to the roof beam. The tool ladder was usually fixed with an iron lock, and the key keeper of the lock was Mr. Sugiyama.

We also obtained the class schedule for the day before the incident three years ago, which stated that the last class that Minako Mochizuki attended at that time was the music class of Teacher Sugiyama.

Based on this, we infer that Teacher Shimoda and Teacher Sugiyama conspired with each other that night to try to kill the child who found evidence of their illegal enrollment, that is, the plaintiff Minako Mochizuki, without committing suicide.

"After the statement is completed, reply to the presiding judge and the judge."

Gongsheng submitted several documents at the same time to the clerk, who then handed them over to the presiding judge.

Photos and documents.

After the presiding judge took it, all the photos were labeled with detailed information on the back, similar to a card format.

The photo is in the middle, and clues and evidence have been written next to the card.

The file includes the key storage documents of Aipado Elementary School three years ago, the curriculum schedule, and each teacher is responsible for managing the classroom.

Complete and with reasonable reasons.

only......

Not decisive.

"Okay, the defendant's lawyer will respond to the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff's lawyer and need to provide factual basis."

These evidences are directional, pointing the problem of the case to the defendant, but they are not conclusive evidence, showing that it was the plaintiff's behavior that caused the problem.

The defendant's lawyer on the other side stood up, and the notebook in his hand had already recorded all the lawsuits that Gongsheng just said.

At the same time, we began to refute the evidence.

"I am the lawyer for the defendant, representing Mr. Yamada and Mr. Sugiyama to refute the plaintiff's complaint."

"The counterargument is as follows:..."

First, the plaintiff's testimony has no legal basis. After learning some things, he maliciously speculated that the defendant was committing murder and dismissed all the plaintiff's causes of action.

Second, three years ago, after the incident, the Metropolitan Police Department had arranged for personnel to go to the scene, and based on the professional appraisal of the Metropolitan Police Department, it was confirmed that the case was a suicide case. Is it possible that the plaintiff's lawyer is more professional than the Metropolitan Police Department?

Professional?

Third, according to the evidence provided by the plaintiff’s lawyer, we also have the same evidence. Three years ago, in addition to my client, Mr. Shimoda, two other teachers in the school also had the door lock of the ballet studio.

As for the lock on the tool ladder, other teachers besides my client had it.

Based on these documents alone, it is presumed that the defendant committed the murder with malice, which was indeed malicious intent.

Fourth, three years ago, the plaintiff Minako Mochizuki committed suicide, but the cause of the suicide has not been known, and Koko Yonehara, who was Minako Mochizuki's class teacher at the time, expressed ignorance.

Mihara Koko belongs to the class teacher, and the class teacher should bear the main responsibility for the student's death. However, the plaintiff's lawyer, you have never raised the existence of Mihara Koko, nor have you speculated on the motivation of the class teacher. Does this indicate that your speculation is biased?

In other words, your speculation is simply to protect your elementary school teacher, Yonehara Koko.

"The defendant has finished its rebuttal and will reply to the presiding judge and judge."

"At the same time, this is the evidence we presented. It is a document from the Mihua Elementary School. It clearly records that Mihara Koko once led an elementary school class, and the monitor of the class at that time was the plaintiff's lawyer, Mr. Mori."

After speaking, the plaintiff's lawyer submitted the document to the clerk.

After being handed over to the presiding judge, the original expression on his face became serious and he stared in the direction of the plaintiff.

If this is indeed the case as shown by this evidence...

Then the entire case may be overturned.

Could it be that the teacher and the student conspired together to forge a series of perjury, with the purpose of targeting the defendant.

The former teacher entrusted the students to file a complaint, then looked for evidence, fabricated perjury, and pushed the case back to the defendant.

If this is the case...

"Plaintiff's lawyer, you must make your identity and that of Yonehara Koko public, otherwise this court will veto all your actions and all your confessions will be invalid!"
To be continued...