This post was completely unplanned...

It comes suddenly and is about to come out, so I have to mention it.

As for this matter, it seems that I never took a stand during the whole process. Now it's time.

He said that he had been paying attention to the Mercedes-Benz oil spill incident before.

I have always hoped that the female car owner can get compensation and a satisfactory answer.

Although the final result is not particularly satisfactory to everyone (for example, financial service fees in gray areas have not been banned; interestingly, this matter is like poking a hornet's nest, setting off a wave, and car owners across the country are asking for their money back), but

It is still a victory for the rights defenders.

The merchants who came later to defend their rights initially thought it was the abuse of trolls at the Mercedes-Benz 4S store, so they didn't take it too seriously.

I searched again today and found out that it is indeed true.

God is reversed and everywhere.

I forwarded a lot of news about the oil spill, and it’s the same this time.

Let’s talk about the attitudes of netizens. There are probably three types:

The first type still insists that "the victim merchant is a mercenary of Mercedes-Benz 4S store".

The second type divides the two things very clearly, "one code returns to another code".

The third type continues to support female car owners, "Heroes also have shortcomings."

To be honest, although I still have doubts in my heart, the evidence is now solid.

The only uncertainty is who will take the blame for this incident.

CCTV supported her when the Mercedes-Benz oil leak occurred, and now CCTV's "Lawyers Are Coming" has begun to help merchants defend their rights.

It's really one code, one code..

As for the third type, you are right to think so. Of course, heroes can have flaws. That's absolutely fine.

The question is, what kind of person can be called a hero.

I personally believe that only those whose merits far outweigh their faults can be called heroes.

You are the victim in one thing.

In another incident, he was the perpetrator.

Moreover, the incident at the merchant was most likely planned (netizens said it was to take advantage of legal loopholes). How to clear the name?

These two things, at best, have equal merits and demerits, and may even not be worth the merits.

I watched the evidence video of the contracted merchant named Huaimanchun on Station B, as well as the videos of other victimized merchants.

It is simply a matter of outrage between humans and gods.

To borrow the words of a netizen:

Think about it, the law is quite miserable. It is a weapon for the strong, but a shackle for the weak. So in this society, the strong will always say domineeringly: Please go through the legal process. This is the case when Mercedes-Benz faces female car owners,

The same goes for female car owners when they face merchants. But the most ironic thing about this is that all netizens thought that the role they were going to play was that of a female car owner, so they followed her and shouted at Mercedes-Benz that there are human feelings besides the law, and for

The merchants shouted that they should go through legal proceedings... Little did they know that the social position of most netizens is that those merchants should...

As above. If there is another reversal in the future (for example, there are other unknown reasons that can prove the innocence of the female car owner), I will apologize again.

The female car owner said, these people who put the crown on me are also the people who ruined this thing.

why.

I want to know who should be responsible for the merchant being owed money.

Hopefully this guy won't get away with it.
Chapter completed!