"Wu Tian, ​​look at you, you're drooling!"

Sun Qiang said coldly in the audience.

"Ah? I don't!"

Wu Tian immediately touched the corner of his mouth and found that it was dry, so there was no "slobber"!

As soon as he finished speaking, Wu Tian reacted, understood what Sun Qiang said, and said coldly: "Are you jealous of Zhu Quan being more popular than you? I am unmarried and have no boyfriend. Even if I am greedy for Zhu Quan's body, it won't be a problem for you!"

"Hmph...humph..."

Seeing that Wu Tian, ​​who had always been introverted, was so directed that Sun Qiang gave up his sarcasm and saved himself from being unable to come to Taiwan.

After Zhu Quan on the stage made a speech on the second debater of the Ma Team, he began to continue to express his position and said: "We believe that money is not the source of all evil.

Why?

Because money cannot fully cover all evil in the world.

According to anthropological research, we know that the form of evil is mainly divided into four categories, and three of them have nothing to do with money. The other party has already told me about the other category.

We say that belief is extremely evil.

In 1995, a poisonous gas incident occurred at a subway station in Tokyo, resulting in the death of 12 people and 5,500 people were admitted to the hospital for treatment.

And we also see that during the Crusades, not only were adults injured, but many innocent and unarmed women and children hid in the church and were burned to death.

We see this kind of case where the most casualties and injuries bleed and the most dead people are the most. Isn’t it in the so-called evil of the other party?

If it is in all evil, what does it have to do with money?

Please waste some time explaining to me later."

To be honest, the second debater of the Protestant Party talked freely, and the long parallel sentences were as powerful as the rainbow. After listening to them, I couldn't help but admire them, but people vaguely felt that something was wrong in their hearts.

What's wrong with them is that Zhu Quan asked them to answer this question.

Zhu Quan was very smart, afraid that the other party's next three debaters would ignore his question, so he directly named the question and said, "I hope they answer it."

This is another intentional waste of the other party's time.

Both Jiang Feng and Yu Lei wrote down this question on the manuscript.

What they have to do next is to focus on this question while debating and listen to whether the other party has answered it.

If there is no answer, then urge him to answer;

If you answer, then you will fall into your own trap and continue to refute as the other party says.

“We also see excessive catharsis of lust.

There is a case in the United States where a woman cut off her husband's descendants with a Western-style knife while she was sleeping.

We say that this kind of tragedy happened because of the small amount of household income or because of hatred?

And we also see that there is a fool in Malaysia because his girlfriend has a new love, and as a result, he dismembered his girlfriend for 13 parts. Is this evil reason because of his inner hatred - his original hatred, or is it because his girlfriend did not pay him a breakup fee?

We know that today's unfaithfulness, unfiliality, unkindness, etc. are all evil.

But we see that Wu Sangui asked the Qing soldiers to enter the pass, for it was Chen Yuanyuan, not the US dollar.

Today we see even more. If you are walking on the road, you see a dog, you kick it, you see a cat, you step on it, is it because you have a tendency to violence, or is it because the cat and that dog owe you money?

So we know that today, many evil decisions in the world do not depend on money, and money cannot lead to the emergence of evil.

Can money be the source of all evil?

If it is really the source of all evil, please explain what the above evils have directly related to money.

Thanks."

Zhu Quan gave the same example, but he was more down-to-earth and easier to understand than the other party, and won more applause.

The four major categories of evil, one is caused by money, is explained by the righteous side, quite sufficient.

The remaining three types of evil are extreme beliefs, one is excessive catharsis of emotions/desire, and the other is irrational violation of value.

Compared with the positive lyrics, Zhu Quan's lyrics can be described by the four words "simple and unpretentious", but the powerful logical power contained in "simple and unpretentious" makes people unable to see directly.

The great lethality caused subtle changes in the mentality of the members of the Zhengfang Ma Team.

The debater Gu Yuebiao, who was sitting in the fourth debate position of the Malay team, finally realized that the scene had become a little out of control, so he secretly told himself that the third debate next to him was about to take the stage, and asked him to "all, in" and try to turn the tide in the third debate.

Although, in the audience's opinion, the situation on the field was once again unclear and fell into a state of anxiety.

But among professionals, the opposition has already had a very obvious advantage.

Host Cen Ying once again took control of the scene and asked the pro-party to establish a statement.

The third debater who came to the Malay team was a man wearing glasses. He looked very gentle and slightly shorter than the other teammates. However, this mouth was an extremely rough voice, with a "severe" contrast.

This is not the first time that the Malays are playing a game. They all know that the three debaters have such a "strong" contrast.

Therefore, before the third debater of the Malay team started his speech, the audience burst into laughter.

"Ha, the most powerful debate is coming!"

"This is so cute!"

"No one dares to make a decision just by listening to this sound!"

"Now not only is the appearance confusing, but the sound is the same!"

...

Accompanied by the laughter of the audience, the third debater of the Pro-President began his own discussion.

“Thank you, Chairman.

First of all, the second debater of the other party told everyone that "no" means everything.

You're wrong!

The word "南" in "南" is an adverb, and the word "南" in "南" in "the source of all evil" we are talking about today is an adjective.

Is it called "putting the horse's mouth on the cow's head" for analogy?"

As soon as this statement came out, the senior debater in the barrage couldn't help but post the barrage and exclaimed:

"This angle is good! I will directly explain the word "Wan"! If I am obsessed with the definition of "Wan", it will be like falling into the bottom line, and our argument has not been held!"

"Is it so miserable? I thought it was the other party showing his understanding of Chinese! Embarrassing.jpg"

"What are you talking about randomly upstairs? Do you understand debate? Here the other party is talking about it more chaotic! Is it important to be an adjective or an adverb? I ask if you have the same meaning? You said the word "南" is different, are you teasing me?"

"Haha, I found it funny when I saw a comment! One, he ran so fast! Two, he ran quickly. The "fast" in the first sentence is an adjective, and the "fast" in the second sentence is an adverb. Tell me that these two "fast" do not mean the same! Few people can tell it immediately!"

"That's right, the problem is not the difference between the two characters "大" and the two characters "大" are discussed today. Just point out that the "大" of "大" of "大" is not "大" of "大" of "大" of "大" of "大" of "大" of "大" is not "大". There is no need to talk nonsense at all."

"This rough voice, coupled with this fierce language, feels very imposing!"

...

The third debater of the pro-party continued to answer Zhu Quan’s question:

"The first problem that the other student asked us to solve today is evil/cultivation, what is the problem?

But do you know that the example of Asahara Aki/Aki you mentioned, A hair of Asahara Aki/Aki was sold to his disciples for 30,000 yen, and a cup of bath water for 50,000 yen. He didn't say it, but he was thinking about the money!

Secondly, the other party’s classmate talked about domestic violence.

Let us think about it, most domestic violence is caused by men hitting women. What do men say when they hit women? "I worked hard to earn money to support my family, but you still don't serve me well!"

Or money!

Third, the other party’s classmate also talked about hatred…”

The three judges of the pro-party refuted Zhu Quan's words one by one, and responded to the examples of "evil/cultural terrorist incidents", "domestic violence", "revenge of killing fathers", and "unfaithfulness and unfiliality" mentioned by Zhu Quan one by one.

I feel like "I'm fighting with you"!

The third debater of the pro-party continued to talk freely, with a kind of courage to burn the boat and a turbulent attack of the entire army.

However, Zhu Quan cited the case of Sha/Lin/Drug/Air in the example, and the third debater stood up and directly described the case as the deeds of Asahara/Zhangho making money through missionary preaching, which obviously avoided the problem.

There is also a second rebuttal point: making money to support a family means that money is the source of all evil!

The problem is secondly avoided again. The most important thing is that the logic of the argumentation for this round of the Malay team's third debate is very chaotic.

The third rebuttal point is, how did the hatred of killing the father and taking his wife become caused by money? The hatred of stealing the wife is equivalent to selling his wife? The hatred of killing the father is equivalent to selling his father?

How do you prove this logic?

The third debate of the Ma Team clearly avoided all the examples proposed by Zhu Quan on the opposite side in a long paragraph. It can be said that it is really amazing!

However, Zhu Quan and four others, as the opposing side, still listened with grim faces, frowned and thought about how to debate the next step.

They dare not relax at all.

At this moment, the atmosphere at the scene reached its highest level!

It can be said that the debate is very interesting, and the uninterrupted applause at the scene is enough to explain everything.

But as the third debater of the pro-party continued to tell the story, the few people who were originally frowning relaxed.

Because Zhu Quan and others have found mistakes in his discussions, some of them have some suspicion of imposing logic on their views, and they have the intention of slapping themselves in their mouths.

Because they had established that "ten thousand" is not "everything", they are trying to explain that all the evils they have raised are caused by money.

It's just giving away a head!

So, this is really "good luck"!

Although the momentum on the field is done well by the Laima team and is very hot, they seem to have ignored the undercurrents below.

The opportunity is here!
Chapter completed!