When Zhu Quan knew that the topic of the debate was "Whether to judge heroes by success or failure", he knew that he was already sure to win.

Not to mention anything else, the verbal boss Yuan Ding of the previous life was a "nuclear bomb". The opponent was dizzy and had no power to resist.

Although Zhu Quan thought he was not very good at debate, he still had enough to inherit and carry forward the will of Yuan Ding in a parallel world.

The female classmate named Wu Tian was still talking about her argument: "... Our era does not have only one value... The idea of ​​judging heroes by success or failure will inevitably be coordinated and restricted by other values ​​in our society..."

On the Internet, barrage has been browsed, and the most common ones are "the sound is so good", "the appearance is suppressed", "I like this girl so much" and so on, etc., barrage that has nothing to do with the debate topic itself.

Of course, there are also barrages that focus on the debate itself:

"What the Zhengfang wants to express is that 'success and failure are one of the criteria for judging heroes', but it is not the only criterion. Based on this point, the Zhengfang can win the game."

"It's great to make a statement!"

"What question is it? Isn't this positive theory just a proverb that 'there is no need to judge heroes by success or failure'? Because there is no way to judge!"

"It depends on your opinion! The opposition needs such understanding, but as a judge, you cannot innately immerse yourself in your opinion. Just look at it like this, the theory developed in this way is appropriate."

"The topic of the times must have the meaning of the times, which is very good!"

"Anyway, I think this argument is a bit neutral. There is a saying that comes from, surrender and lose half of it?"

"2333...well, probably they know that their prescriptions are poisonous, and they can only express that I did not deny your point of view, right?"

"No! You can see the debate topic clearly, okay?! Is the focus of the topic "judging heroes by success or failure"? No! It is "not desirable"! Then, as neutrality, it can prove 'desirable', and naturally, it can win. Should the positive party choose the hard mode?"

"From the topic, this debate can maximize the interests of the positive side, and this compromise is not easily directly refuted."

...

Wu Tian then explained: "...Hero is not a simple person, nor is it a symbol of the medical beauty hero, nor is it a cold tombstone. It represents a symbol of spirit, a banner of the nation and an example of the people. The value of judging heroes by success or failure is to turn people's pursuit of success into a pursuit of spirit, inspire people to be proactive and strive for progress..."

Zhu Quan was listening and recording, and he had already said half of his arguments, but he still could not find any flaws. It was like he had practiced a whole body of Tai Chi, and he directly avoided all the points that could be attacked on the positive side and was in a neutral position.

If you want to refute his argument next, you have to refute your own argument first, which is equivalent to a thousand-year-old tortoise and cannot escape from the world.

This has a special tactical name on the debate field, called "neutral" playing style.

In other words, instead of directly refuting the other party’s views, you will integrate the other party’s views into your own, so that there is B in A, and B is a branch of A.

Just like if A is correct, B can be correct, but if B is wrong, it will not affect whether A is correct or not.

This is a nearly rogue-like style of play. If they realize it, there is no need to continue this game.

Zhu Quan disliked this nonsense debate method, but he still didn't panic because this situation was already expected.

During the previous three hours of brainstorming, Zhu Quan had a comprehensive guess about the possible playing style of the Yellow Team, and now the first debater Wu Tian's speech was within the range he thought.

Debate is not only about expounding one's own views, but also about dismantling the other party's views. Only in this way can you win.

If this is not achieved, then there will be differences when the judges finally judge. "The man is right to speak, and the mother is right to speak", which cannot be perfectly crushed.

For Zhu Quan, victory is not his most important purpose. It is to win a lot and hit the heart of the contestant Sun Qiang who continued to go on the road of debate. This is what Zhu Quan wants to do.

Who made him rude to himself?

At first, Zhu Quan didn't care about the other party's sarcasm to him. After all, the other party actually debated through auditions and looked down on the contestants who came in halfway with the "invitation letter" and thought they were "relationship households". It was normal. Zhu Quan also planned to prove his strength through competitions.

But when Jiang Feng and others told Zhu Quan and said that the reason why Sun Qiang mocked him was because he robbed the quota, which caused his girlfriend to not be "resurrected" from the losers, and they could not participate in the international college debate held in Jiujianwa together.

When Zhu Quan heard that this was the reason, his anger suddenly rose.

Since you and your girlfriend can’t go abroad to eat, drink and have fun, then stay in China and find your girlfriend to comfort each other!

Zhu Quan raised his head and looked at the player Wu Tian who was speaking at Team Huang. At this time, her arguments had reached the end:

"...Pursuing success and encouraging heroes is the symbol of our era and the value orientation needed by our era. The heroes of the era, pursuing success and success of the era, need heroes! Thank you everyone!"

As soon as he finished speaking, applause rang out on the scene.

Then the female host took the stage and said, "Thank you, Wu Tian. Now we ask the opposition to discuss the opposition's position. It is still three minutes."

Jiang Ge, the female classmate who had followed Jiang Feng before, stood up and began to say, "The ancients also said that if the name is not upright, the words will not go well, and if the words are not upright, the words will not go well. Therefore, only by explaining the matter clearly can we have a meaningful debate..."

This is a strategy that Zhu Quan, Jiang Feng and others designated during the preparation period. That is, no matter what the Yellow Team argued, whether it was a head-on or a neutral slap, when he explained it, he had to oppose all the arguments and statements of the positive side in the first sentence.

Of course, it is not to object for the sake of opposition, nor to object word by word, but to refute it at a high level at a high level.

Because the two sides are naturally opposite sides, they say that "a hero is desirable by success or failure", so they focus on "desirable" and are born with the advantage of "separateness" than their own side.

Therefore, we must focus on "success or failure" and focus the debate on the word "success or failure".

After all, the word "desirable" is too broad, and it is not the "can" type of "all", so it gives the Yellow Team enough room to deal with it.

So if you follow the other party, how can your team win this debate?

Therefore, the first step in establishing a statement is to "oppose" everything the Yellow Team said just now, and this second sentence officially puts forward his own point of view:

"Success and failure are relative to specific goals. If you achieve it, you will succeed, and if you fail, you will fail. However, heroes refer to people who can arouse others' honours with their own talent and qualities. The so-called "judging heroes by success and failure" means that if you succeed, you are a hero, and if you fail, you are not a hero."

"So, we think this view is undesirable!"
Chapter completed!