Sun Qiang, the fourth debater of the Yellow Team, looked at Zhu Quan, who was smiling in the second debate seat opposite, and then looked at the three dejected people in his team, and whispered with gritted teeth: "Damn it, please cheer me up, don't let me down. We will explain it based on what we have discussed before, and we will be invincible."

"Zheng Zihao, let me fight back this second debater, and beat me back hard!"

It is undeniable that Sun Qiang's strength is the strongest among these four people, so he won the captain's seat without permission and arranged for Wu Tian to "pass the back door" to defend.

Because for Sun Qiang, the role of the first debate is to express his own arguments prepared before the game according to the script. As long as he can speak, there will be no problem.

As for the subsequent melee, it will be fine to leave it to the other three.

While the female host was controlling the scene and introducing the second debater to the prosecution, Sun Qiang whispered to warn the three of them to obey his arrangements in the audience.

On the other side, Zhu Quan, Jiang Feng and the third debater Yu Lei both praised Jiang Ge's speech just now.

"Jiang Ge, your statement just now is so good!"

Jiang Feng turned his body sideways and said to the position where Jiang Ge was sitting.

"Jiang Ge's gestures, tone, posture, smile, time control, and sense of rhythm of the argument all played a 100% effect. The lawyer Xu from the judges praised Jiang Ge's argument the most."

Yu Lei continued Jiang Feng and said.

"This is thanks to the advice from contestant Zhu Quan to me, and helped me correct some control of rhythm points, making my story more attractive."

Jiang Ge is a gentle woman. Although she studied literature, she majored in international law and also hid her charge and belligerent side.

In the lawyer industry, the little sheep who only knows how to "bae" will be eaten by the big bad wolf who "bae" without any hair left.

"The main thing is that you have talent. You are not bad at all, otherwise you would not have completed so much in just a few dozen minutes."

Zhu Quan has always been a person with clear love and hate, "I respect me one foot, and I respect others one foot", so he naturally has to be able to show goodwill to Jiang Ge.

Besides, this is not a "high hat" that makes something out of nothing.

So what's good about Jiang Ge's speech just now? What's the good about it?

The arguments in the debate should not only depend on the content, but also on her effect.

Just as the third debater Yu Lei said, whether it is Jiang Ge's gestures, tone, posture, smile, time control, and sense of rhythm of the argument, and Jiang Ge's natural sense of aura and natural friendship, there are few that can match him in the debate circle.

Just now, Jiang Ge showed all this to the fullest.

What is a good debate?

In short, it is a good debate voice, which is to let you close your eyes and hear it from beginning to end, and you will not fall asleep because of boredom and depression, nor will you sleep in a harsh and gorgeous way;

A good debate gesture is to let you understand the ups and downs of the argument, but not to overturn the main points;

A good debater, everything he has been born to make arguments and be able to move smoothly.

In other words, the realm of debate is a state of non-existence.

Just like Jiang Ge just now!

Maybe her argument was written by a coach or four people, but every word, every word is her soul, every cum, every smile is her sincerity. Her hard work is not about the manuscript or the confrontation, but in the most difficult places.

Many laymen, even insiders, do not pay attention to this aspect. As Sun Qiang thought, the debate was just a manuscript reading, but in the actual operation, it was really, really, really, really, really, really, very difficult to do.

For example, take the Spring Festival Gala host of the National Television every year as an example, it is nothing more than talking about clichés. For these experienced hosts, it will take more than a month to practice?

Why does it take a lot of time to do "ineffective" work if you just take a look at it before you go on stage?

In fact, this period of time is to achieve the most perfect state through constant practice.

One is as perfect as possible, and the other is fooling. The audience is not a fool, with sharp eyes that can be seen at a glance.

Perfection and good are two different concepts, which is why everyone praised Jiang Ge's performance just now.

"Okay, don't be humble, you both have all made contributions." Jiang Fengzai encouraged Zhu Quan again: "Zhu Quan, this second debate depends on you!"

Zhu Quan nodded slightly, and his eyes also shifted from the first debater to the second debater.

The second debater of Huang team Zheng Zihao is a graduate student majoring in railway systems from Chang'an Jiaotong University. This is his second time to enter the final stage of the trial competition.

The first time, due to the gap in strength and not holding a thigh to take him to fly, I missed the last international college debate.

And this second time, he actually had great luck and drew a team with Sun Qiang.

Although Sun Qiang is only a sophomore, he is already a recognized master in the debate circle and is one of his two thighs selected step by step through auditions.

And the other thigh is Jiang Feng!

In order to reach the finals, Zheng Zihao was the unswerving Sun Qiang Party and obeyed his words as imperial edicts.

Clearing his throat, Zheng Zihao stood up, stretched out his index finger and middle finger of his right hand, gestured with the word "2", and said in a straight voice: "I will point out the two mistakes made by the other classmate."

Then, Zheng Zihao's right index finger was still standing upright, and his middle finger was put down, and he gestured with a word "1", and then said: "The first point, logically, "desirable" means desirable to us, but it is not equivalent to copying and copying. "Undesirable" means that the other party means undesirable. The other party must argue this sentence, which is not worth learning and accepting at any angle or level."

Finally, he let go of his bent index finger again and side by side with the originally erected index finger. Zheng Zihao put on the word "2" and said sternly: "The second point is that the other party regards 'success and failure to judge heroes' as a specific method to apply it in real life practice, but the other party please don't forget that what we are going to do today is a value judgment, not a fact judgment."

Something is good!

When Zhu Quan heard Zheng Zihao's argument, he half-squinted his eyes and recorded the two rebuttals that the other party had just said:

First, the desirable point is desirable, but the undesirable point is not desirable;

Second, do not make factual judgments, only value judgments.

Zheng Zihao then expressed his enthusiasm: "On the personal level, the desirability of this value is reflected in his advocacy of success and encouragement of people to pursue success. He judges heroes by success and failure, encourages people to pursue personal comprehensive development, and achieve the goal of self-improvement and harmony... Being able to get certain incentives and evaluations is the driving force for progress."

"The desirability of this value is also reflected in that it promotes national development, from small to large, pursues the same principle of advocating success. When a country... individuals need success because individuals need self-realization; the country needs success because the country needs a prosperous country and a strong people; our society encourages success because society needs heroic role models."

After a long period of scattering, Zhu Quan's brain was running rapidly in his mind, and he quickly sorted out the points of the other party's argument.

That is, from the personal perspective, we advocate "success and failure to judge heroes" to evaluate and encourage those who achieve their goals. Therefore, evaluation and encouragement can be concluded that evaluation and encouragement are the driving force for progress, so "success and failure to judge heroes" can encourage people to pursue the goal of self-improvement, which is therefore desirable;

Then, from a social perspective, it is advisable to advocate that "success and failure to judge heroes" will give the people a common positive belief and thus promote the sustainable development of the country, which is therefore desirable.

hehe!

It's so fucking nonsense!

It actually went back again!

Since you want to play "value", I will give you a "value class" next!

As the female host controlled the scene, the applause gradually became smaller. Zhu Quan smiled and stood up confidently, and said:

"The other party told us from the first debate to the second debate that their view today is just to prove that 'success and failure to judge heroes' is desirable and desirable. So having desirable and desirable means having undesirable and undesirable. If there is desirable thing, it is desirable, then is it undesirable that it is undesirable?"

"In other words, does the other student also argue our point of view when proving your point of view?"
Chapter completed!