"To be honest, I didn't understand the point of his debate..."?!

What's going on!

Zhu Quan was stunned when he saw this sentence.

A professional debater, let’s call him a professional. After all, he was a reserve member of the national team who entered the college debate with his own strength, and he actually said that he did not understand the point of the debate!

This statement is a bit like "cats don't eat fish, dogs don't eat meat, Ultraman doesn't fight small monsters", which is ridiculous and ridiculous.

However, out of a rigorous academic attitude, Zhu Quan did not easily send a WeChat message based on this sentence to respond to Sun Qiang.

Because Sun Qiang had a long period of time later, there was no right to speak without investigation. Since he said he didn't understand, Zhu Quan didn't mind understanding what he didn't understand first. Fortunately, he explained it to him one by one in his subsequent response.

Zhu Quan unlocked the phone screen with the fingerprint of his right thumb. The content in the college debate chat group appeared on the interface. The latest news is Sun Qiang's long sentence:

"I think Zhu Quan's performance in this issue is just an upgraded version of Fu Ershou. His highlight is just the way of expression and speech skills during debates, but not the argument itself."

Zhu Quan did not agree with this point. Although he made a clear statement in the beginning of the article by making jokes, this is just an appearance!

The core of my debate was quite meaningful.

You cannot deny that large section of argument just because the narration is composed of performance.

Zhu Quan could feel Sun Qiang's deep jealousy, dissatisfaction, arrogance and prejudice towards him from this sentence.

However, Zhu Quan didn't care, sneered and continued to look down.

"...The current rhythm paving and endless laughter made the tickets run on the spot, but after talking about these tickets, they could not be kept and could not play a decisive role in the final vote... Those audiences are fencemen. When Boss Huang said it, he ran away from the tickets, and when Zhu Quan said it, he also ran away from the tickets..."

"...It can be seen that the audience is just as they pleased, and there is no gradual progression of themselves. The psychological factor of "people follow the crowd" is too great, so Zhu Quan just took advantage of the situation..."

hehe!

Zhu Quan only commented on this two words.

What does it mean to "take advantage"?

Zhu Quan did not deny that the 100 audiences at the scene had the mentality of "people follow the crowd", but if you really want to say that you have the advantage of "back-up", you would look down on what Cai Yingjian said during the third debate in the back!

It is the same as breaking up arguments, establishing new ideas, and raising value. It is also quite meticulous in logic, but it has not been able to pull back many votes for the positive side.

Therefore, the "back-up" is not taken advantage of, and the saying "people follow the crowd" is not the most fundamental reason why one wins so many votes.

In other words, Sun Qiang was wrong in both of these points.

Zhu Quan did not doubt whether Sun Qiang's debate ability could understand what he said, but through these few comments, we could know that Sun Qiang made a judgment with tinted glasses.

Zhu Quan patiently continued to look down.

"I feel that if Zhu Quan said a few points in this issue were not on such a stage where sentimentality exceeds rationality, but on a stage of rationality, then after thinking a little, you will find that the arguments he expressed were all very loopholes..."

Seeing this, Zhu Quan smiled contemptuously, and he wanted to see how Sun Qiang was talking nonsense.

"In his first point of view, Zhu Quan said, 'The best destination for famous paintings is to burn them...', so in other words, have the permanently lost cultural relics in human history all obtained the best destination?

There are much more ruined cultural relics than existing cultural relics, but the public knows that the famous things destroyed are just the Old Summer Palace!

If you look at the world, you will be Babylon!

How many people who exist in the world can say it?

I believe there are many!

So according to Zhu Quan's point of view, why don't we destroy all the famous paintings now? Then what people have left is the Old Summer Palace and the Babylonian."

Well... although it's a quibble, it's rational enough.

"Then, Zhu Quan said, 'The value of painting comes from the story behind it, so sacrificing famous paintings to save cats is the best story...'?!

I have to refute this.

A big fire, and this painting was destroyed for a cat, isn’t it a story, isn’t it a story that a person struggled to rescue a painting from the fire?

And will this painting continue to exist and create more stories?”

Something interesting!

It smells like that!

When Zhu Quan saw this, he nodded slightly.

Don’t brag or not, although Sun Qiang is black for the sake of black, he is quite powerful.

"Zhu Quan talks about the Eye of Morality... Save a cat and keep it, which can guarantee that you will be a good person in the future?! Then... Assuming... the cat owner wants it back or the cat dies, then you have no moral constraints?... Is this logic so casual?!"

Zhu Quan frowned. If you make such a tough argument, you can use this to refute all the words!

When we go to school and the teacher teaches us knowledge, can we guarantee that we will definitely be knowledgeable people in the future?!

This is obviously a paradox!

Do you have to use a few to deny everything?!

Sun Qiang still has a lot of things to say, but Zhu Quan feels that there is no need to continue watching.

Because except for the first two points, a rebuttal point was indeed found, but the latter was obviously opposed for the sake of opposition and had no value at all.

After a glance, I saw that it said:

"'Crying sounds nearby cannot be controlled, can you control the crying sounds in the distance?' This sentence itself is so beautiful, but the question is, do all those who care about the crying sounds in the distance must ignore the crying sounds in the distance?

It is true that in history, some people sacrificed others to make great contributions.

But have all those who want to achieve great sacrifices to others without regard for the consequences?

Shouldn't we first analyze in a realistic way? In this context, what did we accomplish and sacrifice? Ask a question and then jump to "the great sacrifice is certainly hypocritical and dangerous"... Is this too irresponsible?"

hehe!

It's really against it for the sake of opposition!

It really represents the majority by a few!

Finally, Sun Qiang concluded: "Zhu Quan's syllogism is like saying to the audience, 'You see, this person is so good at speaking, but I tell you, all you can say are liars, you must be more alert to his words!'."

"So, this is not a logical thinking, it is just a "serious" stance attack that "you lose if you are serious."

Sun Qiang's article, full of hostility, attracted everyone's attention in the college debate group. The leader of the debate team also saw it. He was afraid that there would be conflicts between several team members, so he quickly came out to smooth things over and let everyone discuss the debate topic.
Chapter completed!