The City of Night is cruel, but using annual income division is more attractive than using bloodline division, otherwise the ancient Athens and the Renaissance would not have been hyped by the West.

For those who are controlled by bloodline, Night City is a place of enlightenment and civilization. Even if the poor are suffering, everyone only thinks that they are incompetent and that they will definitely become successful if they go to Night City.

Before entering the casino, gamblers think that they will win money. Night City is a big casino. At least they have the qualifications to serve in the Night City. In other places, the qualifications to serve are restricted to death.

Of course, the underlying logic of annual income is actually bloodline, because means of production can be inherited. No matter how hard people do not make money, they cannot compare to those with means of production. The means of production will not be transferred for no reason, and are usually inherited by the father.

son.

Perhaps someone can have a great fortune and succeed below. Then, if he doesn't look at his bloodline, he will have the opportunity to establish legitimacy.

Everyone cannot change their bloodline, but they can change their annual income. Even if they commit crimes, they are yearning for and respected as long as they can make money.

As for the 'the wine and meat smell smelly, the road is frozen to death', it has never been the disadvantage of Night City. It is the standard for distinguishing people with ability and incompetent. People with ability should have wine and meat smelly, and people with lack of ability should have frozen to death

bone.

The rich people have no obligation to solve social problems.

Only Dongda University will require the monarch, minister, father, son and son to do a good job in the monarch, ministers do a good job in the work of the minister, and father and son also do their own work. Only Dongda University will require the monarch, minister, father and son to follow the example of the wise ancestors.

.

Confucius proposed that the king, ruler, minister, father, father, son and son did not put forward a specific standard, but only said that everyone should be benevolent, righteous, propriety, wise and trustworthy. However, thieves also have the truth, and robbers are also benevolent, righteous, propriety, wise and trustworthy.

The king, the king, the minister, the father, the father, the son, the son, the son, the son, the minister, the minister, the son, the son, the father, the son, the son, the son, the son, and the son, the king, the minister, the minister, the father, the son, and the son, and the son, and the son, can be benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom and trustworthiness.

At this time, Mencius put a patch, asking everyone to follow the example of good people and do good deeds, and replace those who do not do good deeds. Only when standards are established can everyone supervise each other and make demands on the king and father.

The specific requirement put forward at the beginning was the response of heaven and man, that is, the emperor was responsible for natural disasters, and if there were natural disasters in a place, he had to pay for it. So when the emperor had money, the saints would come out of the Yellow River Qing, and when the emperor had no money, the dynasty would change.

After all, the emperor can take money from everyone and invest money in infrastructure. Not every emperor can do it, and if you can't do it, get out of here.

Since the emperor has an obligation, he will naturally make demands on the nobles, so he will make a judgment on "everyone will pay for the money" and "whoever will pay for the money". If the nobles blindly emphasize that "whoever will pay for the money" can be replaced and they must also bear it.

Part of the obligation to 'everyone pay together'.

Therefore, Dongda University asked the rich people to solve the problem. It is the responsibility of the rich people to have frozen bones on the road, which is the standard for judging whether the rich people have legality.

But in other places, there is no such requirement. If you have frozen bones on the road, it is the responsibility of frozen bones. Why do you appear in a place where you freeze to death?

It's like a Western firefighter said: "If you are in danger, it's not the firefighter's problem, it's your problem, why are you in a place where firefighters can't rescue?"

This is nothing wrong with the words. The rich people have no obligation to help the frozen bones. The frozen bones appear in places where they will be frozen to death, and it has nothing to do with the rich people.

So someone is going to ask, how can I get a place that does not freeze to death if my bones are frozen?

You can steal, rob, or buy it in RMB 10.

Then someone will ask, what should the person who was robbed, stolen, or cheated?

That is because if you are not capable, you should be stolen, robbed, or cheated, you should turn into a frozen bone. If you die, you will not die. This is the basic survival rule.

Everyone is competing for resources and controlling resources. Whoever competes for it but cannot control it is incapable of it. Being able to seize resources and controlling resources means having the ability.

The more resources you control, the more annual income you earn, the more capable you are.

But if there are famines, floods, wildfires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks and other events occur, no one will solve them, because everyone's obligation is to control resources, not to take out resources.

Of course, the Chinese people also know that cooperation is needed. The Chinese people and Chinese people can control the black materials from each other through Loli Island, understand each other through the student fraternity, learn and cooperate through training sports, and of course they can also directly join the army.

If a rich man wants to cooperate with ordinary people, he needs religion.

Some people are very opposed to religious ethics. After all, religion also has restrictions on aristocrats. When the people are organized by religion, they have an impact on the rich.

Therefore, in order to crush religious ethics, the nobles also worked very hard. But the needs of the people are here. Even if the nobles oppose it, the people still need to join forces. Religion is definitely not the worst choice.

Religion is also very good at robbing resources and controlling resources. Therefore, the nobles have to fight against religion because they are peers. But when the president takes office, he needs to swear according to the Bible. Because the Bible can suppress the nobles to a certain extent.

The parliament is a game of three controls five, five controls nine, so to suppress three, the Bible is undoubtedly the best choice.

This is also very contradictory. The nobles want to suppress religion and borrow religion to balance the relationship between everyone. It can be said that it is very contradictory, but that's it, because the nobles hope that the fellow Taoists will die and not die, but no one can guarantee that they are not.

Immortal fellow Taoist', everyone wants to snatch resources, and they are also the target of being snatched.

When robbing others, you dislike religion from being in trouble. When you are robbed, you will hope for religious protection.

Therefore, the nobles who have the advantage will desperately destroy religious ethics, and the weak side must use religion to protect themselves. Both sides will continue to pull and confront.

Religion is not inherited by blood. It does not depend on bloodline, but on everyone’s understanding of doctrines. Therefore, religious churches run schools to pass on doctrines.

Of course, religion does not have the obligation to solve social problems. The main obligation of religion is to make more people believe in religion, rather than solve problems. Any problem is a test of God and does not need to be solved, but only patience.

Buddhism believes that all problems are entanglements of the human heart. As long as you let go, the world will be empty, all dreams and bubbles. Letting go of greed for fame and fortune, and letting go of fear of birth, old age, sickness and death are all fake.

Religion will not require the rich to solve problems. Between solving problems and religion, religion is a more cost-effective choice. Solving problems is really too expensive and difficult.

To solve the problem, we need to first solve the contradiction between "everyone pays money together" and "whoever uses it will pay money". If we need everyone to pay money together, we need to solve the trust problem and the subsequent distribution problem must also be solved, otherwise good things will turn into bad things.

After solving these problems, you have to tighten your belt to do hard and tiring work. Someone needs to do all kinds of work. It is really hard and tiring. Even this generation has enjoyed the dividends of solving problems and won the next generation.

Only then can you enjoy it.

The process of solving problems is very long and there are no dividends immediately.

If you want everyone to rob together, you will get dividends and everyone will continue to do so. But if you tighten your belt and work together, it will be too difficult.

So it is more convenient to rob. If you rob, you will be divided. If you can't rob, you will be disbanded. If you go back, you will be together. If you go back, you will be robbed of your neighbors next time. If you can't rob the enemy, you will be robbed of your neighbors. There is no problem for them.

, because snatching resources and controlling resources is their ability. Solving problems is not their obligation.

"The City of Night is heaven and hell. People who master resources can do whatever they want, because they only need to enjoy it, and there is no way to restrain them. But for people without resources, they deserve it if they die, and they are incompetent, not
Chapter completed!