In name, the Soviet Union was the other side of the Cold War, but the Soviet Union never found the correct response method and response scale, and passively followed the track set by the West and was involved in an arms race that was ignorant of oneself and not the enemy. The Soviet Union was keen on stabilizing the borders of Eastern Europe, a vested interest without any substantial significance and substantial threat, and was keen on obtaining a Western methodological recognition without any substantial significance, keen on developing military deployments in the defensive situation, participating in a conventional and nuclear arms race with short attacks, and ended up falling into the West - following the Western-led track and competition with the strengths of the West.

The key to the Cold War lies in the direction of the elite, because the elite like to achieve dominant position and generally support the elitist system. In 1949, the United States' Acheson hoped for the "** individualist" of China, Mao Zedong pointed out incisively when meeting with American journalist Louis Anna Strong: There was no way to attack the Soviet Union before the United States suppressed the middle ground. The purpose of launching the Cold War was to attack the American people first. In 1953, the McCarthy movement in the United States became a wonderful footnote to Mao Zedong's prophecy. Mao Zedong.

The statement that "the east wind overwhelms the west wind" is based on the profound reflection of the elite system by the Western elite at that time. Churchill, the famous white militiaman, the initiator of the Cold War, became clearer about this point. Only Khrushchev, who advocated "the whole nation. The National Party", was ignorant. The disintegration of the Soviet Union and the failure of the Cold War actually began in the Khrushchev era, and it can even be traced back to Stalin's "technology determines everything, and cadres determines everything", but in the end it became a great success at the hands of Gorbachev and Jelitsin.

It is not accidental that the West claimed that the Cold War ended with the failure of the Soviet Union. This was the result of the West's "those who are afraid of being prepared will win." The Soviet Union's mistake was to simply focus on military preparation and wrongly give up the use of ideological resources, while the final victory of the West was the followers of elites in the third world countries and the betrayal of the people's interests by the elites of the Eastern Soviets. China's reform and opening-up policy was objectively conducive to the West's goal of achieving its Cold War, which not only strengthened the West's monopoly position and deteriorated the trade conditions of third world countries, but also expanded the activity territory of monopoly enterprises.

The victory of the Cold War was the disappearance of doubts and negative emotions about the elitist system in Western society. The sign of this incident was the rise of Reagan of the United States and Thatcher of Britain, and the gain of the neo-**ist economic policy. The disintegration and turn of the Soviet Union were only the expansion of the results of the Cold War. It was the elitist system that occupied a larger area of ​​territory and involved more people with the efforts of local elites.

The key to the victory of the Cold War lies in the fact that the elite class is generally loyal to elitism. Whether in the Third World or the First World, and the formerly opposing groups, the efforts to establish an elitist system have played a decisive role. The disintegration and turn of the Soviet Union and Dongdong were not a competition of the charm of the capitalist system, nor a competition of economic efficiency, but rather an elitist keen on establishing a social system that prioritizes the elite.

Due to the long-term efforts of the Cold War era, the process of combining Western intellectual elites with political power was also completed at the same time. At the same time as the Cold War ended, Western intellectual elites had completely forgotten their reflection on the war and could not wait to declare the "end of history". After the War, Western intellectual elites reflected on the war based on human conscience and doubted the fundamental system of the West, today they have been defined as "the sympathizer of the Soviet Union" in the West in a typical McCarthy tone.

Due to the disintegration and turn of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, China entered reform and opening up, and monopoly capital quickly expanded to a global scale in the world's territory, and the West's foreign goals were also achieved at the same time. Moreover, due to the advancement of computer technology, the West was able to gain an unprecedented monopoly position in the world market on the basis of technological monopoly. The foundation for the West to dominate international trade after the war quickly shifted from the "scissors gap" before the war to the north-south trade relationship between monopoly prices and competitive prices. It was in this process that the West achieved unprecedented prosperity and development.

In addition to the dominance of the Western world, the establishment of an international trade order that uses monopoly prices to compete is not only the Western world, but also the southern countries generally regard modernization as an unshakable goal of a country's efforts. In fact, it is another major reason why this process was successfully completed. In the early stages of industrialization and development, southern countries could only start from labor-intensive and resource-intensive products with their own advantages, making the export product structures of third world countries similar and forming a competitive trend. At the same time, due to the popularization of industrialization around the world, the scale of development and utilization of natural resources and the scale of trade have been unprecedentedly expanded. The West has also obtained an unprecedented "high-price" product export market, and at the same time obtains unprecedented monopoly profits. It is precisely with the support of monopoly profits that the West has been able to establish a very superior resource utilization position around the world, making its economic scale completely unlimited by its own economic resources and become a high-priced product supply center and resource consumption center in the world.

The West dominated most of the world's resources with monopoly prices, while Soviet enterprises did not get a share of the pie in this process. It is precisely for this reason that the Soviet Union's participation in the arms race became a heavy burden, while the West achieved prosperity and development. Because Soviet enterprises could not make enough monopoly profits from the world market by setting goals and operating methods, which can be seen from the sincerity of the Big Brother's technical assistance to China; on the contrary, Western enterprises successfully established a global monopoly interest import relationship, and concentratedly utilized global resources to compete with the Soviet group through the international market system.

It is precisely because of the deepening of the Cold War process that resources from all over the world need to be mobilized, and the degree of development and utilization of natural resources by third world countries has also increased greatly. In order not to isolate themselves, support and win over allies (such as the Marshall Plan) has also caused the wealthy class to be excessively expanded. All of this has caused a huge deterioration in the relationship between man and nature. Even if wealth and development are limited to the current narrow range, the corresponding natural resources seem to be unsupported.

At the same time, the development of intelligent technology has made the processing and utilization of resources no longer rely on the exploitation of workers. For example, the operating processes such as cotton picking and milking that were originally thought to be difficult to achieve automation have now been automated. Therefore, for maintaining a wealthy life, the urgent problem is to reduce the number of people sharing limited resources on the earth. The peaceful coexistence between the rich and the poor has been deeply questioned. This is the fundamental reason why the conflict of civilizations arises. Theoretically, reducing the wealthy population is more effective than reducing the poor, but the rich are currently allies of the United States. The hostile relations countries established in the past era are all third world countries, so the result of the development of the common surname is to target those countries that were packaged as ideological enemies in the past.

Due to the huge population base of China, it is now the second largest energy consumer in the world, and industrial products rank second in the world in terms of output. Moreover, the per capita energy consumption of China is still only 12 in the world average. It seems that China has the technical ability and determination to further develop and utilize natural resources. China is and will be the fastest increase in resource consumption in the world. China is already a development process that has led to a sharp decline in the prices of labor-intensive products. The next step is very likely to be to step down the technology monopoly of the West. Therefore, China is not only a country that threatens the West's resource allocation status, but also the biggest potential opponent that may threaten the West's monopoly profits.

Since the limited resources of the earth cannot be changed, a prosperous and developed life is not only unwilling to change, but also becomes a consumerist ideology, a symbol of superior system and ** (that is, ** is satisfied without being actively restrained), and cannot be completely reversed at once. Therefore, it can be expected that developed countries will eventually become enemies of the United States, and the so-called "no war broke out between ** countries" will not exist for a long time. This situation is just an illusion---the illusion when allies are still needed before the common enemy disappears. The first strategic goal has not been achieved, so the second goal has not yet been elevated to the illusion when the matter is held.

The world's population reached 1 billion around 1800, which took nearly 3 million years. The second 1 billion reached in 1930, and 130 years. The world's population reached 3 billion in 1960, 4 billion in 1975, and 5 billion in 1987. Today, the world's total population has exceeded 6 billion. While the population is growing rapidly, the world's natural resources, especially the non-renewable natural resources that industries mainly rely on, have not grown simultaneously. Moreover, due to the improvement of the development level, while the population has increased sharply, per capita resource consumption continues to increase. The growth of energy consumption, especially the growth of urban population, is highly positively correlated. Today, the energy 97.5% of the energy dependent on the world economy is non-renewable mineral energy, and more than 70% of the industrial output value is obtained in the processing of non-renewable resources.

The world's steel production was 189 million tons in 1950, exceeded 500 million tons in 1968, reached 600 million tons in 1972, and exceeded 700 million tons in 1974. Currently, steel production is in a stable state, hovering between 700 and 750 million tons. As a symbol of modern consumerism, private cars currently sell about 35 million units per year, of which about 15 million units in the United States and about 13.6 million units in Western Europe. Currently, the world's car ownership is 92 units per 1,000 people, the United States has 400 units, 368 units in Western Europe, and 383 units in Japan, which is basically saturated, while China and India have 5 units per 1,000 people.

Taking energy consumption as an example, the world's energy consumption (converted to standard coal) increased from 1850 to 1950 from 1850 to 2.5 billion tons, and exceeded 10 billion tons in 1988. The per capita energy consumption increased from 115 kilograms in 1850 to 1,000 kilograms in 1950, and reached per capita in 1995.

55 kilograms, the per capita consumption of the United States in 1995 was 11,312 kilograms. The per capita consumption of China was 1,083 kilograms. Of course, with the advancement of technology, it is not yet possible to think that the population has formed an absolute surplus to the earth and has reached any growth limit. However, the rich are unwilling to live a roughly equal living standard with the poor. They have to live at the highest level that technology can achieve, so world resources are obviously unable to support such a desire. Among them, the United States is particularly outstanding, and it is absolutely unwilling to sacrifice its wealth and development for the sake of the environment and future generations, and reduce the obligations they should bear first to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Refusing to sign the Kyoto Protocol is an obvious example.

Because China's population base is huge, although the per capita amount is small, the total energy consumption accounts for about 19 of the world's total, and China's steel production accounts for the top 17. From here, we can roughly understand why China has become the number one enemy of the United States.

In the 1930s, Hayek, Austria, became notorious in the Western academic community for his unique right-wing view in the debate on socialism with Lange in Poland. In 1974, this person was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics, and even he was so happy that he burst into tears, believing that he had restored his reputation. In the 1990s, this person was praised by Chinese elitists as the "prophet of the 20th century" and regarded as the founder of **ism.

After the war, the Western welfare state system, which was a profound result of the Western elite class and a compromise with civilian power, was criticized by British and American elitists as "British disease" by British and American elitists in the late 1970s. The rise of Thatcher and Reagan was the most obvious sign of the political dominance of the Western right-wing forces. The Western elite class had completely forgotten the reflection on the two world wars and the Great Depression within less than 30 years after the war, refused to coordinate with the interests of the disadvantaged classes, and made every effort to promote the law of the jungle and became the "eternal interest" of the Western elite.

In 19..8.9, the "end of history" put forward by Fukuyama, an unknown official of the US State Department, was quickly praised by the British and American media as a classic of neo-nationism, and then packaged as a classic of human civilization. The Chinese elites also spent a lot of effort in this process.

In the 1990s, the so-called American strategists were extremely active and played a great role in summarizing and promoting the establishment of the United States' national strategy. Among them, Brzezinsky's "The Big Chess Game" can be regarded as the declaration of American unilateralism, while Huntington's "The Conflict of Civilization and the Reconstruction of World History" is the general line of American unilateralism.

Lenin said that "monopoly is the highest stage of capitalism." According to today's social reality, the Western elitist system has indeed ended. This end of time has been reflected by the irreducible profound human-land contradictions. What the elitist system and lifestyle are now facing natural hard-name constraints. Under such a background, the clamor of civilization conflicts in the West, especially the United States, is already the prelude to Western racists preparing to engage in a war on population elimination, and Chinese people cannot take this lightly.

The prosperity and development of the West are the new and unshakable basic national interests of the West. The realization of this interest is based on the Western monopoly position in technology and the realization of Western multinational enterprises in the international market. Maintaining this interest also requires two measures accordingly: First, promote the rise of the monopoly position of Western multinational corporations and promote the self-restriction of state power that has a role in decomposing monopoly position; second, prevent the transfer of key technologies, strengthen the competitive position of monopoly capital with the West's financial strength, and promote the disintegration, bankruptcy and mergers of third-world countries. Eliminating the restrictions on monopoly enterprises by state power and eliminating small and medium-sized competitors in the market, and giving capital a complete victory is the unswerving goal of Western countries.

The ability of American companies to obtain monopoly profits in the world market is the basis of resource input. The huge scale of resource utilization is an indispensable material basis for the wealth and development of the United States. Richness and development are the fundamental interests of every American. This is also the basis for the United States to maintain social integration in the jungle law. The so-called "big pie theory" is a lower-level "full flow of material wealth", which can obviously greatly ease the tension between people under the American elitist system.

Based on the above consensus, the American elite and the people formed a consensus racist (patriotic) sentiment and lasted forever. This is the only secret. The key to the United States is the input of interests, the trinity of racism and wealth. For the United States without material abundance, those who are interested can check how many shootings occurred in gas stations in the United States during the Second Oil Crisis in 1979.

After the United States was attacked by the "war attack" (the authoritative definition of Bush Jr.), the explicit performances of American politicians and media elites, as well as the deep racist sentiment reflected in the people's opinion test, are very surprising. For Chinese people, after being demonized by the United States as an enemy for many years, they have a deep understanding and experience of the deep racist complex among the American people. Racism is the hopeless cancer of American society and is one of the main maintenance forces of the United States. Without the sticky effect of racism, the United States will be in danger of disintegration. Of course, racism does not happen out of thin air. Its premise is monopolizing profits and interests input (Intel and Microsoft are taxing the whole world on behalf of the United States). The result is that the United States has an advantageous position in the distribution of world resources and can achieve a level of wealth that others cannot achieve.

The prosperity and development of the West are based on the advantageous position in the distribution of resources on the earth. This advantageous position is based on monopoly prices. In the international market, the third world uses competition to price-name products, which cannot be shaken and cannot be changed. It is in such an international trade system that the prosperity and development of the West can be maintained, as the former Secretary-General of the United Nations said, "Development is based on underdevelopment, and the wealth of a few is conditional on the poverty of the majority." Under the constraints of resources, modernization is always only the value of a part of people. It lacks the material basis for popularization of all mankind. It is a dream that elitists can realize. This dream is based on the destruction of the basic living conditions of the majority. Therefore, the value of modernization, which is not proven, is a thorough elitist value.

The United States is by no means a supporter of a "multi-polar world", or even a supporter of a "one super and many strong". The United States needs a completely thorough dominant position. In the face of the increasing trend of world resource shortage, the United States pursues a completely uncontrollable and negotiated right to allocate resources, rather than its current dominant position in resource possession and utilization. Because of the progress of computer technology and intelligent technology, exploiting the poor is no longer a condition for the wealthy, so the necessary surname for peaceful coexistence between the rich and the poor tends to disappear. This is the pursuit of the United States and the internal logic of the conflict of civilizations.

Monopoly profit is the core of new global interests. With the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization as the main positions, the West has unremittingly promoted "small political axeism" and "new-**ism" to third-world countries, in order to realize the principle of third-world countries accepting self-restriction, eliminate the final restrictive force on multinational corporations, so that multinational corporations can play a monopoly advantage in order to strengthen the control of Western countries in the distribution of world resources and determine the dominant position of the people. The so-called "integration with the international community" craze in China, the behavior of joining the World Trade Organization at all costs, should be said to be in line with the strategic interests of the West, and the key lies in how the West uses this process to extract more interests and concessions.

Modernization and the Western Cold War and Post-Cold War ideology are the two pillars of Western Cold War ideology, the ideological factors that help establish an elitist system, and the theoretical and practical basis for attracting third world countries to follow the path of elitism, because modernization and the Western Conference can achieve "elite priority" in political and economic interests and improve the social status of the elites. The mainstream intellectual elites in China deliberately promote modernization and the Western Conference as social development goals and declare them as the so-called "universal values ​​of mankind". In fact, modernization and the Western Conference are both preset positions of elitism that implicitly "elite priority".

The core and charm of the concept of modernization lies in: affirming that people should get the right surname that is satisfied by the highest level that technology can achieve. The concept of modernization itself is the premise of consumerism that "feeling first" and the elitism that "pursuing Laozi's first in the world". This premise is in line with people's most primitive, and it completely denies the question of whether man and nature should be coordinated and whether people should live in harmony. It is in this sense that modernization is a value rather than science, and a value based on human beings and instincts that does not require evidence and proof.

In the relationship between man and nature, unless people can break through the laws of "immortality of matter" and "energy balance", limited earth resources cannot support the entire population to achieve modernization, so wealth and development have no universal significance. The more advanced modern technology, the higher the living standards people can achieve with the help of technology, the more non-renewable resources each unit needs, the fewer wealthy people can support with limited earth resources, and the population range that modernization can cover must be further narrowed.

All ** cannot be "representative system", the people of the representative system. The representative of the Italian representative cannot be ordinary workers and peasants, but can only be elites from all walks of life. The only purpose of the representative system is to require the general public to "vote" various policy strategies based on the elitist economic and political system, and to choose the elitist ruling group of different interest groups. It is never possible to rely on the advantage of votes to choose the peaceful and civilian policies like Mao Ze. Dong, in essence, to select the elite's political interests and the legal surname. Therefore, it is impossible to carry out institutional changes that are beneficial to the common people to any extent and promote the coordination of the interests of the elite and the civilian class. Therefore, ** is just a political form that requires the elite, and to recognise the reasonable surnames of the elitist political solicitation system.

Therefore, the preset position of modernization and ** is not difficult to interpret. This preset position is in line with the interests of Western countries in international relations. It is not only conducive to promoting the elitist system globally, but also the elites will gain domestic dominance in this system. While establishing domestic social differentiation, the elites will become an unpopular class at home. Therefore, the elites will inevitably seek moral and diplomatic and even military support from the West. The conditions are of course to give priority to the national interests of Western countries.

In the post-Cold War era, this way of thinking was manifested in two strange consequences. Taking China as an example, within 20 years since the beginning of reform and opening up, China quickly completed the process of "industrial technology marginalization" from the national economic system with a basic reading ability, and plagiarism and imitation in the field of thought, and quickly completed the process of "ideological marginalization" of the Chinese intellectual community.

Under the trend of changing corporate survival status in recent years, the organizational structure and staffing of state-owned enterprises are the least incompatible with the requirements of marginalized enterprises, so they are quickly marginalized, forming a semi-dead marginalized survival state.

Judging from the corporate structure of Shenzhen and Shenzhen, most of them have no social burden. The employees are young and strong and willing to work night and night to open up the market. At the same time, the company's development goals cannot have long-term plans. They work entirely to improve the current personal survival status and work for pure interests. Therefore, they are most in line with the marginalized enterprise conditions for division of labor in international market enterprises, so they quickly become a necessary bridge between large Western enterprises and the Chinese market. From this corporate goal that purely serves the market, small scale is an advantage. It is just right to not pursue technical development capabilities. However, it is correct to require employees to prepare for learning and master the skills of the best. It is only necessary to be interested in occupying the market. The more interested in earning the difference than product development, the key to cooperation with Western enterprises.

Since the 1980s, Western elitism, consumerism and individualism have been introduced as ideologies of reform and opening up. During a period, mainstream media has been centered on this. The attention and research on China's own problems have been invisible. The entire intellectual community is keen on the introduction and interpretation of Western elitism ideas, which is a typical ideological marginalization phenomenon.

In the 1990s, the Western right-wing thought, which was originally a taboo, was also regarded as advanced ideas as dominant in university forums. The academic works and academic schools of universities across the country were rapidly westernized, and even the teaching methods of university textbooks and teaching methods were fully aligned with the West. The so-called "facing the world", "integrating with the international community" and "building the world first-class" were shocking. The key fact behind this noise is whether the problems faced by China and Chinese people are in line with the international community? Or which group of people's main concern is to establish and consolidate the elitist system? The Guanghua School of Management at Peking University is actually a complete Guangmei Academy.

The blind advocacy of Chinese knowledge elites on the knowledge economy and salivating for the so-called high technology and high added value are essentially flattering the monopoly profits. This process most reflects the marginalized ideological characteristics possessed by Chinese knowledge elites, which are manifestations of losing the ability to think and study problems with reading, losing the interests and value judgment ability of reading. It is under the dominance of this ideological marginalization that the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs no longer has the ability to explain the roots of China.

What is the interests of our country? In response to the US's unipolar world pursuit, it is extremely ridiculous to propose a "multipolar trend" in an impactful manner. Does China need to establish a sphere of influence? For every time the United States makes a groundless accusation against China, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson's practice must deny the additional implicit guarantee statement. In fact, isn't this the guarantee that the United States is just needed? And it is to make a guarantee to the deeply hostile other party within the national interests of a sovereign state.

The change in the international relations pattern in the post-Cold War era was the disappearance of the middle ground, the control of Western monopoly capital over the global economy was unprecedentedly deepened, and the military and political strength of Western countries also expanded. The formation of this international relations pattern was composed of the huge contribution of China. Although Western countries have technological advantages and have formed monopoly on it, the products of third-world countries in the international market entered the trap of competitive prices, which was due to the decisive role of China's all-round opening process. China developed an "export-oriented" economy with almost unlimited human resources, which resulted in the rapid increase in the supply of low-tech products in the world market, which caused the price of similar products to drop sharply, and promoted the sharp deterioration of trade conditions in third-world countries. On the contrary, the monopoly profits of multinational corporations in Western countries increased sharply.

Due to the strengthening and deteriorating economic competition in the third world, it has become more politically disintegrating and differentiated. Due to the unprecedented increase in the sources of low-tech products, the West was able to use trade inclination as a political means to interfere with the internal and foreign policies of third world countries, which further aggravated the political disunity of third world countries. As the Cold War ideology---modernization and the road of modernization, the elite class of third world countries fully grasped the state's political power, and the vast majority chose the elite socio-economic system. The influence of the third world in global affairs tended to disappear, and as the balance of interests of major powers, the role of isolation and buffer zones disappeared.

The trade conditions in the third world have deteriorated sharply. Europe and the United States are in an alliance with monopoly profits. Although the Cold War ended, the alliance relationship between countries has strengthened, and the maintenance of the common economic monopoly interests in the international market is not caused by China's actions to challenge the hegemony of the United States, but the United States needs to fix or even reduce the survival status of the Chinese people, leaving a limited number of non-renewable resources for the prosperity and development of the West. On this issue, Europe and the United States have common interests. China should not fantasize about Western divisions and hope to win over Europe and Japan through diplomatic or political differentiation methods. The differences between European allies and the United States only have case-based significance and special names, which are tactical interests and should not be used as evidence to rely on.

The nmd plan was opposed by European countries not because of justice and axioms, but because the United States has played too much this time, hoping to build its Jedi security on the basis of absolute insecurity of its allies, so that its allies will encounter unrestrained nuclear destruction. On the issue of strategic security, this is a space that American forces are difficult to coordinate and exchange. Therefore, although it is difficult for differentiation of Japan to try on diplomatic and political levels, the strategic survival issue will be the focus of the divorce between Japan and the United States.

China needs to unswervingly tell Japan that if Japan follows the United States in the war, China will concentrate its main force to attack Japan. It is necessary to make the risk of strike and the cost of war that Japan bears is large enough to exceed the scope of benefits that the United States can give and ensure, so that Japan may have neutrality or turn. The premise of this transformation is possible, because the United States is no longer the United States during the post-war period when it implemented the Marshall Plan. Japan's economy has been suppressed and destroyed by the United States since the 1980s. In fact, the main point that Japan relies on the United States is the role of oil order and market, which cannot be compared with the strategic war confrontation of the destruction that the United States will launch.

After the disintegration, Russia faced serious economic difficulties and intensified domestic class contradictions, and the degree of social integration decreased, making it difficult to make a difference in the world. The manifestation of the Kosovo incident was the result of the choice of a thorough "hiding one's strength and maintaining one's low-key" policy. Due to the collapse and weakening of the Soviet Union, Western countries, especially the United States, have been willing to put Russia aside. The Kosovo War is the result of the United States' agreement to put Russia behind China. Russia's rise requires that China bear most of the strategic pressure of the United States. This was the opinion expressed by Russia in the language of action during the NATO war in the South - it would never take the lead. At the same time, China could no longer avoid such a situation. The United States has ended its European priority strategy.

The War of Invasion of the South is the situation where the United States officially ended its strategic swing in Eurasia, establishing the principle of US strategy eastward migration and Asia first, and China will replace Russia as the United States' first strategic rival. It is from this point that Russia fully cooperated with the United States' actions and actively promoted the smooth transfer of the United States' strategy. If Russia had a firm attitude in the War of Invasion of the South, NATO could not continue the war. If Russia transported 0 air defense missiles such as C-300pum, NATO would not be able to carry out the air war to the end, and the Mis was not afraid of ground wars. Primakov inappropriately called for the alliance between China and Russia and India during his visit to India, which almost ruined President Yeltsin's good intentions. He made mistakes on major national strategies based on emotions rather than reason, and was therefore dismissed.

It is in this sense that we can understand what the Western media said, "The Kosovo War is the last European war." Russia has lost the will to confront the West, the front line will move eastward, and the next war will break out in Asia. The "misunderstorm" incident of the Chinese embassy being "missively bombed" is the best and most vivid embodiment of this meaning, and it is also a powerful signal to the Chinese government and people in advance.

It is worth remembering that in the 1950s and 1960s, the Soviet Union and China competed to be the boss, but now they avoided it and gave in to China. However, rational choices cannot balance emotional damage, and the war invasion of the South is often a slap in the face. Russia has formed a strong revenge in its country: it is necessary to arm the People's Liberation Army of China to fight against the United States. However, any dependence on Russia is wrong. Judging from the diplomatic performance of China in the 1970s and 1980s, Russia may have a great chance of strategic swing. The idea that it can rely on Russia's nuclear arsenal to maintain the strategic balance of power in the world today is extremely dangerous.

With the loss of political unity in the third world countries, Russia does not stand out, and Europe and the United States are in the same interest alliance, other third world countries and India have not yet been able to grow up. China's strategic situation is very prominent and has undoubtedly become the primary target of submission of the United States. No matter what political and economic system China adopts, and whether it stands out in diplomatic and international affairs, there will be no fundamental difference. How does the relationship with China be the cornerstone of the United States establish an absolute dominant position? The United States undermines Sino-US relations because it places Sino-US relations at the top of the world's global relations and strategic core.

The US-led Sino-US relations are not about pursuing cooperative relations, or even vassal relations of China, but about pursuing an elimination effect. The US demonization of China is not because of lack of understanding of China, but about the fact that China loses its normal and even necessary influence. The United States often makes unreasonable accusations against China's political axes on the spread of weapons, which is precisely the result that the United States is unable to accept and reassure about China's meager military power and technology. The United States needs China and the world in the sense of danger and the most obedient to the sense of driving. Such China and the world are the unipolar world in the true sense. Because the United States' strategic goal is no longer ideological differences or the values ​​of the ****, but the potential need of China's huge population for the share of world resources. This potential resource requirement, the more closely China moves towards Western values, the more likely it is to contradict the core interests of the West's wealthy and developed.

It should be said that in recent years, the incumbent leaders of China have become more and more honest and respectful to the United States. However, this has not hindered the eastward movement of the United States' strategic focus, did not hinder the United States from causing trouble and trouble in Sino-US relations, and did not reduce the demonization of China by mainstream media in the United States. These problems cannot be solved by "increasing trust". In fact, even if the leader signs a surrender letter to the United States, it will be useless. Because China is vast and has a large population, once a leader like Taizu appears, the United States will be out of reach and will be difficult to achieve its wish. Therefore, the most ideal state is that the leader of Baodao advocates, divided into seven pieces, and each will do its own thing to attack and kill each other, so that the American Asian order that satisfactory can always rest assured.

Western strategist Huntington declared "clash of civilizations", and the past examples of conflicts of civilizations were genocide and colonization. In his book "Clash of civilizations and the reconstruction of world history", Hentington implies that the means of conflict of civilizations is nuclear war, and the risk that the United States needs to prevent is nuclear counterattack, and the United States' national missile defense system is prepared to prevent nuclear counterattack. This is a real war of limited resources and the right to survival, not a war of priority, so there is no room for avoidance, concession and compromise. Because priority can be waived, and the right to survival cannot be waived, unless China automatically divides into seven pieces and conquers each other, the United States will never believe in any "suburd" guarantee and commitment in China.

Americans are very clear and firm, while the Chinese government is full of fluke mentality, and even hopes to implement American-style institutional arrangements to avoid difficulties in Sino-US relations. Some wise think tanks, like ** people (of course, more tactful and refined in their statements), claim that the problem lies in leadership and socialism. These people probably forgot the truth that Taizu discovered that "sir always beats students" and do not know whether China's political and economic system is closer to the US model or the gap is greater after the reform and opening up in the past twenty years? Why are there more and more human-causing incidents in Sino-US relations?

What China needs to pursue is not equality, not a multipolar world, but the right to survival of the poor who represent the world 34, and needs to stand up. Moreover, China has no room for hiding and "hiding its strength and keeping its low profile", because if the United States does not completely suppress China, it will not be able to expand its advantages until it dominates the world. Subduing China is the first step in this process. Therefore, China does not try to avoid and reduce any trouble, but must be upright and cheer up with confidence and work hard for the world to enter the path of overall coordinated development. The Chinese nation's right to survival is here. (To be continued.)
Chapter completed!