A few days ago, a book friend joined the group for this book, but when he mentioned this book, he directly pointed out a problem: the white book has not been tear up yet, just like the protagonist himself is talking about philosophy.

I was stunned for a moment, and then replied that this book was not intended to be a fight, and then I brought up a bunch of words such as "the fight" that were not the point.

Later I thought about it, it was really ridiculous to say these words. The book "Dan Jiao" is now very high. You, an author who is very happy to write about the fight. Now you say that you write about the fight between Chunwu and Wa2 and don't want to write about the fight. Why are you pretending to be aloof?

But, in fact, when I was writing this book, when I went back to read the outline I ordered foreshadowing for this book, I found that I had buried all the foreshadowings of the main lines and set up all the emotional lines, but in this process, I really didn't think about writing a fight. From the beginning, when I wrote this book, what I wanted to say was this so-called philosophy.

Of course, I am not saying that I want to write philosophy and then write this book. In fact, if someone has a little impression of these concepts of political philosophy, he will find that the philosophical loopholes in my book are full of flaws and the logic is particularly bad. The original purpose of my writing this book was actually to write a somewhat different fan of spring things.

When Wakashi wrote about the spring things, I think his focus should not be the final fight between the Yukino Party and the Tuanzi Party. He wanted to write about the changes of several students who were in different situations with a very awkward mentality in adolescence. However, with the rendering of animations, including the transfer of shots of some novels, many people ignore these things and understand the great teacher for the fight for Wa4. This is actually putting the cart before the horse.

So, although I set up a very strange protagonist, I set up a very far-fetched logic of the protagonist's behavior. Compared with the big teacher, this protagonist cannot resonate with anyone, and can only make people feel that this guy is bored and very second-class.

However, I still want to write about a transformation, a middle school student's transformation, which is the focus I want to pay attention to. I can't write a protagonist that resonates with people, and even the protagonist has some templates of Long Aotian in online novels, but I still want to write about changes in people like spring things.

Of course, I also have things I want to convey, the protagonist's various ways. If you can obviously find that he has done something wrong, then the logic behind him doing this at that time is what I opposed. If you think he has done it right, then the values ​​behind it may be what I want to convey, that's all.

People will feel that the long paragraph of the protagonist's psychological monologue I often write is not understood, and I am dizzy, and then skip it. I often suggest that everyone skip it, but in fact, that is what I spend the most time every time I write a chapter. If I just go through the plot and write a dialogue, it is really easy to write 4,000 words in each chapter, but often only about 1,000 words of monologue is what I spend the most energy. Of course, I know that in the end, there are few people who pay attention to these words or want to string them together, but this is also a small obsession of my personal.

To be honest, it is difficult to write about the fan of Chunwu. It is not difficult to imitate the style of Doraemon (except Chiba's meme). It is not difficult to write about the emotional disputes between the protagonists. However, the difficulty lies in the fact that I want to show that kind of mentality change, and I also want to build a logical system and framework for this mentality change, and also look for loopholes in this logical system and framework and overturn it. Then this is a problem I have been struggling with. This is also the reason why I couldn't write even when I first started the book. Even when I had enough time to write during the summer vacation, I couldn't write well.

So I still feel that the chapters during the summer vacation are really well written. I often think about the terms and writing of each chapter for two days. But now I find that I either use a lot of daily conversations to pass the content of a chapter without any promotion effect on the plot, or I just use monologues to push a plot out of a plot and then turn to the next chapter. Not only will everyone be confused, but it will also make people feel that you are just pretending to be intoxicated and intoxicated.

Of course, there is also a first-person issue here. When I was writing about Yan Jiao, I once complained that the third-person writing method could not allow the protagonist's psychological activities to be inserted naturally. But now when I write white, I suddenly find that I have written too many psychological activities and dialogue descriptions, which slowed down the pace of the plot. This problem has not been reflected when writing the original plot. Just like when I recently wrote this plot by Shahi, I felt that there was no change every time I finished a chapter and felt that there was no change in my heart. I felt that I felt too guilty.

But it looks like there is nothing I can do.

Actually, after saying so much, I just want to talk about the willful idea of ​​the willful author who wrote this book. I think it will be easy to write the plot as a real fight. I also like to write this kind of thing, but I still want to innovate and change. As for everyone, I understand that I am very pretentious and think that if I don’t fight, I will feel superior to the plot.

Of course, in the end, I am still very grateful to the book friends who have been voting for me. Although I have not done such a thing as asking for votes and adding updates for a long time, the current recommendation list is really beyond my expectations. I believe that many book friends who voted for me did not come to see me talking about philosophy, but I still thank you very much.

One thing I often warn myself is that the author's personal goods must not be allowed to surpass the novel story itself. Although it has been difficult for me to find a balance between this private goods and the plot of the story. I have been pouring private goods recently, but I will still try my best to adjust and make this book seem less inconsistent. The next one should be the final climax plot of the second volume, but it will not be as refreshing as the first volume, and may seem a little depressing, but I still hope to write what I want to write to everyone, huh, that's it.
Chapter completed!