What is youth? This seems to be a question that every adolescent boy and girl will ask. Among their answers, some will praise the beauty of youth in a regular manner, and some will expose the sins of youth on a whim. But I'm sorry, I don't want to

To use an adjective or noun to explain youth, for me, we might as well discuss the identity attached to the period of "youth". The so-called identity that young people between the ages of 12 and 18 must experience——

The identity of a middle school student. If I understand the meaning of this identity, I may be able to understand the meaning of youth.

However, what is the meaning of this identity, or in other words, what is the purpose of switching between secondary education and higher education in these six years, and what is the significance of switching between the two identities of junior high school students and high school students?

What is it?

I think the most important thing is to use the three years of junior high school to make mistakes and understand them, and then use the three years of high school to correct these mistakes. Of course, almost no one will agree with my answer, because this is just me

It is a personal judgment. However, there is a certain affirmation of my answer in the social psychological cognition. Otherwise, what do the two concepts of "chuunibyou" and "high school debut" in the public mean respectively? Yes

, the former means the mistakes made in junior high school, and the latter means the new look of high school.

Therefore, youth is a process of discovering mistakes and self-correction, and two different identities of middle school students have already done a good job of planning time for us.

Therefore, no matter whether a person realizes it or not, from the time he becomes a high school student, it means that the era of ignorant sensibility has gone away from him. The so-called indulgence of oneself in the name of youth should not exist starting from high school.

So, what did my three years in junior high school tell me?

It is a crime of talent.

Yes, talent is evil. Some people may be surprised. If it were not for those exceptionally talented people in the world to discover, create, and lead, how would human civilization have emerged and how would human society have progressed and developed?

How can I sit in this very comfortable room and talk about these messy things?

But I must point out that your judgment is only based on the results, because there is no evidence that without the discovery, creation, and leadership of talented people, human civilization cannot develop to the present level, because people are used to it.

We obey those who are talented and are used to adapting to the progress brought by talented people. Because we default that talented people will definitely lead to our progress, we selectively ignore the destruction that talented people bring to human society.

.

That's right, when looking at history, the impact that talent can bring to human society is often from two aspects, and it is likely that talent will cause more destruction. If it is destroyed, it does not exist, does not exist, so we

We don’t know, we don’t know, so we have forgotten the destruction that talent brings. Fortunately, in the corners of history, we can still find some truths in this regard, such as the darkness of the Middle Ages caused by the preaching of the great Jesus Christ.

, such as the collapse of the Han Empire caused by the great Wang Mang's reforms, such as the weakening of France caused by the great Napoleon's conquest, just because their failures were eventually covered up by some other successes and cover-ups, so people ignored this talent.

The reality of coming destruction.

So, why is talent a sin? That’s because talent is the logic of human action. If you have a talent in a certain area, you will naturally become more proficient in doing a certain thing, and you will naturally become the so-called strong person in this field. If

A talented person only exists as a member of a group practice and as an individual, so there is no problem. Because no matter how an individual uses his talent, his final result, whether it is success or destruction, will still have an impact on society and history.

Very little.

But the problem is that humans obey the strong, so humans will tend to obey talented people. And having talents and becoming a leader will inevitably bring about overconfidence in talents. Overconfidence is arrogance and arrogance.

, will lead to insufficient self-judgment, and will do things beyond one's own capabilities. If this person is a leader, then he will make decisions that exceed the collective capabilities, and the final result will be the destruction of the collective.

Therefore, talent is the source of destruction. Talent itself does not seem to be wrong, but talent will lead to disillusionment when used by humans, and talent becomes evil.

Of course, from this logic, it is the arrogance and arrogance in human nature that lead to the evil of talent, but the problem is that no one can guarantee that after having talent, he will not suffer from arrogance and lack of judgment under the influence of talent.

, so I can’t. Because this is the most profound lesson I have learned from my three years in high school. Therefore, my approach is to try not to use my talents. Only by not using my talents can I allow myself to reflect on myself. Only by staying away from my talents can I develop my talents.

You can prevent yourself from creating evil. This may be an escape, but for humans, only this kind of prudence and rationality can bring long-term success.

I can't stop others from creating evil, but I forgive them because they don't know the horror of talent. However, I can't guide them because I'm not God, but since I know this, at least I should avoid the occurrence of evil, at least

I should do my best.
Chapter completed!