Wang Hao thought for a moment and said with doubts, "This is my long-standing research. I have told many people that the research started last year, and it has been more than three months now, right? I didn't feel it was sudden.

"

Several mathematics professors nearby, including many reporters present, couldn't help but raise their eyebrows.

Three months?

Proof of Kakutani Conjecture?

If this is not sudden, what can be called sudden?

If you consider that during this period of time, Wang Hao has also completed several small studies, and each of them is very valuable, it feels even more amazing. It can be said that he completed the research without spending any time.

Many people began to count the time, and the reporter who asked the next question took advantage of the situation and asked, "Professor Wang Hao, as you said, the research took three months, but as far as I know, general mathematical results,

It takes such a long time from submission to publication, do you have anything to say about this?”

"This is normal."

Wang Hao said calmly, "And the publication speed has nothing to do with me. I just submit the manuscript normally. I submitted the manuscript last week. I would like to thank Mr. Bruce Pulitzer, the editor-in-chief of "New Advances in Mathematics", who said that as long as I submit the manuscript, it will be published."

It will be reviewed and published soon, and he did it."

He finished speaking with a serious face, which made many people present feel strange.

Is this a public admission of privilege?

Because he has a good relationship with the editor-in-chief of "New Advances in Mathematics", the speed of review and publication has become faster. As for the matter itself, it feels like "going through the back door".

Unfortunately, no one can say anything!

Even other scholars who contributed to "New Advances in Mathematics" would find it difficult to say anything about this 'back door' incident, because Wang Hao completed the proof of Kakutani's conjecture.

If they can complete mathematical results at the same level, even some top academic journals may not necessarily print an issue just for the results.

Wang Hao continued, "Actually, you have thought about one thing wrong. Many people may think that I completed the proof very quickly, including the previous small proofs, such as denying the palindrome conjecture and the proof of 6174.

.”

The reporters listened carefully.

He continued, "Actually, these are the same results."

This statement immediately stunned many people. They could not imagine that several proofs would be one result.

Wang Hao explained, "I have been studying a new mathematical method. The Kakutani conjecture, the palindrome conjecture, and the 6174 problem are all mathematical problems that use numbers to increase, decrease, and transform through column calculations."

"They are not separate mathematical problems, but a class of mathematical problems."

"I hope to find a mathematical method to solve this type of mathematical problem. My research has made some progress, so I initially disproved the palindrome conjecture."

"Kakutani's conjecture is nothing, it's just one of the more complicated problems of this kind."

"So next, I plan to summarize and publish it. This mathematical method is the most important result."

Wang Hao finished speaking very seriously.

What he said was well-founded and convincing. Kakutani's conjecture was just an application of the mathematical method he studied. There is no doubt that this mathematical method is more important than the proof of Kakutani's conjecture.

No matter how influential the Kakutani conjecture is, it is just a conjecture. It can even be said to be a mathematical game. Solving the Kakutani conjecture itself will not promote mathematics.

The mathematical methods used to solve the Kakutani conjecture can even be applied to other similar problems, which can be said to be of great significance to the development of mathematics.

However, many people still find it strange when they listen carefully.

"Kakutani's conjecture is nothing?"

How do you think about this sentence? Why does it feel a bit strange?

The feelings of the reporters in the audience were not very obvious. They just recorded the content and prepared to release the news.

Many mathematics professors and other scholars in the venue were silent.

Does Kakutani's conjecture mean nothing?

So who are we...
Chapter completed!