The new issue of "Annihilation Physics and Theory" publishes three papers from the Mason Number Laboratory.

The list of paper authors includes everyone in the research group.

Among them, "Zero State Energy" and "Tachyon Flow" both have four main authors in the list, namely Paul Phil-Jones, Helen, Chen Mengmeng and Ding Zhiqiang.

The last article "Time Independence under Conventional Field Forces", the main authors are Wang Hao, Paul Phil-Jones, Chen Mengmeng, Helen and others are listed in the author column.

Compared to the fact that the paper comes from the Mason Number Laboratory, and that among the authors are four Nobel Prize winners in physics, the release of the paper is still very low-key.

This time it was really low-key, and the impact after the release was also very low-key.

The whole world is paying attention to the most important election issue, and many top international physicists have been interviewed to express their opinions.

They do this for a reason.

When the campaign content included scientific and technological support, scholars found that their status improved, especially those top physicists. Media reporters always came to interview them, hoping to know their attitude towards antimatter research.

This has resulted in many physicists not having the time to do research.

For the new issue of "Annihilation Physics and Theory", the number of orders has not changed much, but the number of people viewing it immediately has decreased.

On the day the new issue was published, public opinion at home and abroad could be said to be calm. Until the next morning, a medium-sized media revealed that the new issue of "Annihilation Physics and Theory" had Wang Hao as the main author.

paper.

This media clearly did not understand the content.

Wang Hao's name has great appeal in the academic world, and is also very attractive in public opinion. Several other heavyweight scholars, including Paul Phil-Jones, Helen, Chen Mengmeng, and three Nobel Prize winners in physics

Scholarship recipients were simply ignored.

Of course, being ignored is only temporary.

As time passed, reports began to rise exponentially, and the rise was initially due to the words of Bentley Williams, a professor at the California Institute of Technology, saying, "You are right to interview me now, I just read

The latest papers are from Wang Hao and Paul."

"Wang Hao, you must know that Paul, the winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics, was actually a professor at the California Institute of Technology."

"Yes, we are colleagues, but our relationship is not good. This is not a big deal, because in school, it is difficult to find people with whom he has a good relationship... even the students hate him."

"It's not important at this time. Of course, I'm talking about his new achievements."

"Although I hate him very much, I must admit that the content of this new result is very good. His research denies antimatter. It does not deny the existence of antimatter, but denies that antimatter was created in explosion accidents."

After Bentley-Williams finished speaking, he said matter-of-factly, "You are right, I absolutely support the No. 2 candidate because he treats science more rationally rather than writing a blank check."

"I don't believe in antimatter, let alone antimatter technology."

Bentley-Williams' interview made a large group of people look at the new issue of "Annihilation Physics and Theory", and they immediately noticed three papers.

Judging from the names of the papers, they are all about theoretical physics and seem to have nothing to do with antimatter.

From the content point of view...

Most people can’t understand it!

Some top scholars also read the paper. They studied and understood it carefully. The so-called "denial of antimatter" appeared in the first paper. The research established an existence called "zero state energy" and believed that the "energy intensity limit"

Under the state of a strong annihilation force field, a large amount of zero-state energy will accumulate, thereby annihilating active particles and releasing energy consistent with the mass-energy equation.

In other words, the first paper believed that the cause of the explosion accident was the annihilation of active particles and the release of huge amounts of pure energy.

The next two articles can be said to be supplements to the first article.

Most of the content in the first article is based on settings, and there is no complete mathematical foundation. The mathematical logic does not form a closed loop, and there are many doubtful aspects.

The second article supplements the content and demonstrates the existence of tachyons under the normal annihilation force field.

Later, it was also mentioned that the generation method of a tachyon particle flow is "by passing through an ultra-high-energy strong annihilation force field and entering the conventional force field universe."

Particles in the strong annihilation force field will become more active, and the speed of light is higher than that of the conventional force field. When the superluminal particle flow passes out of the strong annihilation force field, it will not return to the speed of light immediately after being affected by inertia, but will continue to move at the speed of light.

Exists in a state of super-light speed.

The second paper is still incomplete. Whenever you talk about super-light speed, you will definitely think of "The Theory of Relativity".

The last article is a supplement to the second article. It demonstrates the time problem in the "tachyon flow". If the time problem is solved, more than 90% of the problems will be solved.

The third paper is also the most complex.

Even the top mathematicians and physicists will need a long time to understand the entire content of the third paper.

The media certainly can’t wait.

When reporters interviewed several top physicists, they immediately reported what they found, "Wang Hao's latest research refutes the Theory of Relativity!"

"Wang Hao VS Einstein, who do you support?"

"Is the Theory of Relativity true or false? Wang Hao's research believes that there are errors in the space-time content of the Theory of Relativity!"

As the report continued to unfold, the topic became more targeted.

Some scientists who opposed antimatter research stood up and said affirmatively, "Wang Hao's research believes that antimatter does not exist. What appeared in the explosion was not antimatter, but the annihilation of particles."

"The explosion accident has nothing to do with antimatter, so the so-called 'antimatter support' has no basis."

"Now we can be sure that antimatter-related research can be declared over before it even begins."

This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content! "No one in the world of physics is more authoritative than Wang Hao. He denied that antimatter appeared in experiments, so we can think that it does not exist in experiments at least.

Antimatter..."

When the topic of science is added to the campaign, it will naturally attract a lot of reports, and many top scholars will come forward to express their opinions.

Candidate No. 1 immediately became passive.

The plan proposed by the support team of the No. 1 candidate is "antimatter research." If antimatter did not appear in the explosion, their plan would be meaningless.

The support team immediately reacted and came up with various theories, "Wang Hao believes that the explosion accident has nothing to do with antimatter, which does not mean that antimatter cannot be studied. In fact, we have been investing in this area and have accumulated decades of experience...

…”

"Wang Hao may not be right. His research is just theory."

"We are convinced that antimatter exists, and a theoretical study means nothing."

"Wang Hao not only denied antimatter, he also denied the Theory of Relativity. This kind of research itself is meaningless and cannot be accepted by the physics community."

This statement is somewhat useful.

A large number of physicists cannot even accept the existence of tachyons, so naturally they cannot accept the denial of the Theory of Relativity.

Even if it's just the theory of space-time relativity...

No way!

These physicists stood up and expressed their opinions one after another, but their influence did not seem to be very great, and they did not have a direct effect on the direction of public opinion.

The reason must still be attributed to Wang Hao.

Wang Hao is recognized as the world's number one mathematician and physicist. No scientist dares to compare with him. In the minds of many people, his achievements have surpassed historical figures such as Einstein and Newton.

One is recognized as the number one scientist.

On the other side are a lot of politicians and "unknown" scholars. If you put them in front of an ordinary person, who will he believe?

There is no doubt about the result.

Most people will believe the number one scientist, even scientists from other countries, because the number one scientist is "face-conscious" and can already leave his name in history, so why would he still lie?

Politicians and ‘unknown’ academics are different.

They can have many reasons for lying, and it can be explained just to achieve their goal.

As for ‘denying the Theory of Relativity’, is it important?

If it were Newtonian mechanics, perhaps more people would know about it. "The Theory of Relativity" is really too high-level for ordinary people, and most of them have only heard of the name.

So, it doesn't matter at all.

Of course, the denial of the Theory of Relativity is important to physicists.

"The Theory of Relativity" is written into textbooks and has been widely used and studied in astronomy and physics. The negative impact of part of the content is huge.

Many people in the physics community said, "Absolutely unacceptable."

There have been a lot of objections in the academic world. They believe that Wang Hao's research is wrong, and even think that Wang Hao fabricated the research.

the latter……

A new explanation soon emerged.

When the support team of candidate No. 1 found that the negative research effect was not very good, he immediately changed his statement, "I have reason to suspect that candidate No. 2 has contact with Wang Hao's team."

"Wang Hao's team supports the No. 2 candidate, so they compiled such a research paper. Maybe there is a transfer of interests between them."

"This is extremely bad behavior."

"We believe this should be investigated..."

This is a conspiracy theory.

However, conspiracy theories still have a certain market, especially among the team supporting the No. 1 decision-maker, including world-famous media tycoons.
To be continued...