A beautiful girl with orchids in the valley and green bamboos as beautiful as jade, used her clanging momentum with the sound of gold and stone to preach the summary of the sound of death knell for the Fudan University team.

There is no doubt that this beauty is Feng Jianxiong's best partner, Yu Meiqin.

Some of her words were summarized by Feng Jianxiong before the game, but more were condensed by her own battle after free debate. From the mood to the tone, from the body movements to the expression rhythm, there was a natural beauty.

"...Marx said in "Das Kapital" that private property ownership was born at the end of the primitive human society, and it ran through slave society, feudal society, capital pays attention to society, and eventually it would be demise in the communist society.

Therefore, those who make the judgment that "because there are private property in slave society, feudal society and capitalist society" can be said to be that Shu dogs bark on the sun and summer insects speak ice.

They were like turkeys born after Thanksgiving, and only observed them for a short year. Because they could eat feed after hearing the chicken feeding bell ring at 11 a.m. every year, they summarized the feed as "eight at 11 a.m. every day" as "universal truth". However, they did not know that the next time Thanksgiving comes, they would face slaughter.

Therefore, when you can see how far the past is, you can see how far the future is. Turkey cannot understand the attention of communists, nor can it understand the right to privacy and eventually return to nature and disappear naturally. Only wise people who can think from the macro level of the entire history of the development of the universe can understand the unpredictability of this historical wheel.

So, is it a form that there is no private property in primitive society, and that there is no private property in the communist society? Obviously not. Marx told us that the former is selfless property with great material poverty, while the latter is selfless property with great material production and flooding.

Similarly, the concept of privacy has gone through a similar stage of development from nothing to something in the history of human development. The former is that there are too few people who can know and do not need the concept of privacy; while the latter is that there are too many people who can understand deeply, and do not need the concept of privacy.

Before the emergence of the large-scale social division of labor in capital attention, we lived in a society of acquaintances, so we did not need privacy rights. The social order composed of the hometown patriarchs and neighbors and relatives made everyone understand each other’s background, so privacy is not important.

But after capital pays attention to deconstructing society and reorganizing the "Stranger Cooperation", it is limited by the constraints of the human brain. According to physiologists' analysis, if the human brain does not rely on any external forces, it can only build more than 200 strong social relationships, or even at most tens of thousands or tens of thousands of weak social relationships.

This data is calculated based on our "Homosaholics". According to the latest archaeological achievements of anthropologists in recent years, if it is the "Neanderthals" that have been destroyed by our ancestors, it may only produce strong social relationships of 30 to 50 people. Neanderthals' brain capacity is not weaker than Homosa, and their physiques are stronger. It is only because their social cooperation range is lower that our ancestor Homosa has been exterminated.

So that is to say, if a person does not rely on external technology and only relies on physiological instincts, he can only know and apply the details of less than 200 people at most. However, under the attention of capital division of labor, he needs to cooperate with tens of thousands of people. Therefore, in order to protect himself, humans can only use privacy to cover themselves, just to avoid the insecurity and injustice caused by ‘if others know my private affairs very well, but I don’t understand his private affairs’.

It can be seen that from the perspective of jurisprudence, this pursuit is just a stopgap measure implemented for the secondary legal interests of "fairness", and is not the original goal pursued by mankind.

However, with the development of the Internet, artificial intelligence and big data technology in the future, how can we know that humans cannot use information technology to break through the cognitive limits of the human brain, and from "only maintain 200 very familiar strong relationships" to "can understand and grasp the details of millions of people anytime and anywhere"? As long as this technology can be realized and is fair to both parties, how much does it have or not have privacy rights?

Imagine that if there is a social credit system that allows both parties to know each other's background equally and automatically jump out of data as soon as they scan their faces, then what's wrong?

The world will complete a state of "everyone knows only 200 people" and moves forward to "everyone knows only 200 people, and wraps up and protects themselves to the rest of society", and finally reaches the state of "everyone can know the bottom line with millions or even hundreds of millions of people" - there is nothing impossible, and the cost of data collection and application is declining at an exponential rate of several times each year.

In today's era, we may still see a lot of telecommunications fraud and malicious sales caused by privacy leakage, but is this really only solved through historical regression and disconnection of the Internet? Not! In theory, if every telephone card in the country can be made in real name and all virtual phones in the network are forced to lock and track IP and personal ids of Internet users, then telecommunications fraud will disappear in an instant.

Therefore, the existence of this kind of fraud is not a matter of pure privacy leakage!

Instead, the privacy is not leaked equally enough, and the privacy of some criminals hiding in dark corners is hidden!

In the process of pursuing 100% real-name system, there may be greater and greater pain.

Because good people are always prone to real names first, while bad people are always more professional in how to prevent real names and poached, so that they can hide for a while - but as long as the country and industry have action plans and determination, it is really only a while, and you will endure it.

With such a wonderful prospect, are we going to reject this thing that will obviously bring favorable results overall due to a brief pain? The rolling forward of the Internet and intelligent information technology obviously brings great progress in the times and can eradicate the privacy issue.

In this situation, we can't help but ask the other debater: When your mother gave birth to you, she would hold you back into the uterus in order to reduce pain, so she would ignore the meaning of life in order to reduce pain?

Who is more important? Who is more important? Who is more important?

Finally, I want to say that even if the right to privacy becomes an irrelevant right and no longer concerned by society and law, it does not mean that we cannot pursue privacy and value privacy - we have never opposed privacy today, but are just weighing the right to privacy and the development of humanity.

We just said that when that day comes, this kind of thing is so slight that it is not worth using laws and policies to regulate it.

For individuals who are obsessed with privacy, we still respect their own choices in a tolerant manner. They can leave their computers without using their mobile phones and live in seclusion in the mountains.

Any era will give such people the dignity of being independent of the world - but we should not be at the cost of restricting the development of Internet technology. Thank you, my speech is over."

Yu Meiqin's powerful summary recitation echoed in the studio, making her deafening.

The four members of the Fudan University team felt like they were lost, and they felt the despair from the depths of their souls.

"What kind of play is this? And this kind of operation?" Gu Heren and Bai Jingyou's souls were shouting, hoarse and desperate, and they were hopeless.

Before Yu Meiqin's summary statement, the Fudan University team did not resist repeatedly during the free debate stage.

However, Gu Heren and his team's resistance focus is nothing more than the perspective of "Privacy violations are easily defrauded, harassed, maliciously promoted, and unsafe..." and other exhaustive examples.

However, in terms of the structure of the theoretical system, the Fudan University team has completely lost its ability to resist after Feng Jianxiong built three theoretical tricks.

The Jinling University team used a group of arguments similar to "Although these problems are caused by privacy leakage, they are also caused by the other party's privacy leakage not thoroughly enough, and the two parties are not equal and fair enough. So after all, this is a fairness issue, not a question of whether privacy should be leaked." It blocked back without changing.

As for this analysis angle, no one thought of Fudan team before the game! No one thought of this possibility!

This cannot be blamed for the incompetence of the Fudan team. It was really the debate circle on earth in 2006. No one would have thought of this kind of reverse problem-solving angle.

Just like before the Earthlings came into contact with the Three-Body Stars, before the birth of Luo Ji and Ye Wenjie, they could not understand the principle of "sociology of the universe".

"Jinling Division, I actually made this idea! They actually chose to analyze this problem from the perspective of the universe and civilization history! It's really a weird entry point that people can't think of!" The judge Luo Fatty clenched his fists, and when he thought of the wonderful and exciting part, his palms were clenched and sweating.

"And every detail is so concise, from the Oxford Law Dictionary to the relevant jurisprudence evidence, it is full of everything. Even the concept of privacy, the legal term, was verified in 1890. The scope of the discussion is so strict that there is no chance of a definition war to the other party!

It is not surprising to think of any of these points alone. The difficulty is that the whole article is so linked, with the beginning and end echoing, and each pit is filled in. I admire it, admire it!" Another judge Gao Dasong sighed.

The host of the competition, Sabinin, looked at the five judges whispering, and all showed admiration and approval. It was estimated that the division team would win this game.

"This... is this considered creating history? Is it true that the first non-985 garbage university in history, qualifying for the Sing Tao to participate in the international competition?" Sabining looked at the relevant information he read before the game, and found that it was indeed a record-breaking one.

A teasing statement that has just become popular among online trolls in the past two years emerged in his mind:

"It's not that Fudan doesn't do its best, but Brother Xiong has Gundam."

...

"Thank you for your trust, and it's a great honor to be the judges on behalf of the jury to comment on tonight's competition."

More than ten minutes later, as the dust settled, the poet Yu Qiuyu was recommended by his peers (actually, it was decided). He walked up to the rostrum as if he was humble, sat next to Sabining, sorted out the microphone, and began to speak.

"First of all, I would like to thank both teams participating tonight for contributing a wonderful game to us. From debate skills to planning and layout, I have to say that the performance of the two teams tonight in these aspects is the best of the competitions I have seen this year.

The Fudan University team of the Zhengfang seems to have done a lot of preparations, citing widely, and the argument scale is very large and solid. The argument stage is magnificent and lofty, and the confrontation is short and frequent in the free debate stage, and it is very tenacious. But the shortcomings are that the overall feeling is that it gives people a sense of being energetic but not giving the right place, and the opponent's offensive points are not expected. When asked about the key contradictions, there is a lack of head-on confrontation. Judging from the left and right, his phenomenon still exists.

In contrast, the Jinling Normal University team has no advantage in terms of arguments and case organization. However, their theoretical system construction and the selection of attack points are really very clear and their imagination is dazzling. Many macroeconomic outlooks have very magnificent standards, and although they have never heard of it, they seem to make sense..."

"After unanimous evaluation by the jury, the best debater in this game was: the fourth debater on the opposition side, Yu Meiqin."

"Now, I will leave the final judgment result of the competition to the host to read it."

Yu Qiuyu said, and handed a envelope to Sabining as usual.

For the best debater, Yu Meiqin was temporarily in the limelight, and the members of the division team were expected - mainly because the enemy's prediction ability on this topic is relatively poor, so many confrontations at the theoretical system level are not easy to form confrontation during free debate.

Therefore, in the pre-match plan, Feng Jianxiong took care of it: "If the 'the enemy's right to privacy only exists at a certain stage in human history' does not attack at all, then we don't have to talk too much to avoid reminding the other party. Just leave the outstanding parts of our overall theoretical system to summarize and then release them systematically."

Such strategic and tactical arrangements, as well as the enemy's biased nature, led to Yu Meiqin's final perfection.

Feng Jianxiong is used to winning the best debater, so he doesn't feel jealous of a match for his teammates. Although this is the final and has the highest value, it is still just a domestic event after all. The final highlight of the international competition to go to Xingdao after the winter vacation next year is the final highlight.

On the rostrum, Sabinin unfolded in an official manner, smiling but speechlessly: "Now I announce that the jury's evaluation result is 1:4, and the Jinling Normal University team won! Let us congratulate them!"

"Win! Finally won! Sure enough!"

In the audience, Snicker, Feng Yiji and Zhou Tianyin cried with joy and hugged each other warmly.

Ding Lihui took the DV and dazed for a while, sighing: "Even a strong school like Fudan can win... Should I be glad that many seniors and seniors didn't have the chance to report such exciting news..."
Chapter completed!