Tang Wen, a debater at the University of Central S, in his three-minute argument,

The three points of "the governance of urban congestion should be based on restricting public vehicles rather than restricting private vehicles, and the government's public power should be strictly restricted, so we should set an example first", "the governance of energy consumption should be guided by economic means rather than restricting administrative means", and "the governance of urban pollution should be based on developing new energy technology rather than restricting private vehicles".

It can be regarded as refuting all the "several reasons why private cars are necessary" stated by Nan Xiaoniao at the beginning.

From the heart, the rebuttal cannot be considered very strong, but at least it is always answered questions and confrontation, without any omissions.

The reason for this is because Tang Wen's ability is limited. When preparing for the game, the Zhongshu University team obviously prepared a set of corresponding refutations and evidence for a certain type of imaginary enemy problem.

This arrangement will not be very effective when encountering the enemy's speeches, because the opponent may have plugged the leaks themselves, and the opposition will still spray for the spray as planned.

"It's Feng Jianxiong who is too cautious. Tang Wen's ability can only do this. The key point later is to the fight during free debate. I guess I have to release some core information in advance, otherwise the intermediate stage is more than the actual policy strategy, and I'm afraid I can't get through it."

Yang Weiwei thought to herself, while writing a small note to her second debater and third debater, she fine-tuned her game strategy.

At the same time, the judges also made a judgment on the opposition's level of argument.

"The opening statement of the opposing side was also written before the game, and the degree of adaptability is too low." Professor Jiang from Fudan felt this way.

"I just made random choices based on the module, but the adjustment of the speech did not keep up with it." Professor Zhang from Peking University thought.

When everyone was in the face of grasping the standards in their hearts, host Sabinin announced that the competition had entered the next stage: "Now, we have entered the free debate stage, please start first!"

Feng Jianxiong hints at Tian Haimo with his eyes, and Tian Haimo stood up first.

"Xiaoxiong's prediction is indeed very accurate. The other party is preparing to fight the vaginal contraction man, but suddenly lift the task when the conclusion is made. Therefore, there is no clear idea in the discussion, but just counterattacking. If you pass this, it seems that the viewpoint is too scattered."

Tian Haimo took a deep breath. She knew her duty, which was to provoke and humiliate the other party's current situation first, forcing the enemy to take out their trump card completely:

"I don't know if the opening statements of the opponent's debater were written in a modular manner before the race. When we made a statement, we clearly stated that we should "take a multi-pronged approach" to manage the above-mentioned three major syndromes in cities. Private cars must be restricted and public cars must be restricted. New energy vehicles must be promoted, but the number of old cars must be controlled fundamentally directly.

I really don’t understand why the opponent’s debater still refutes it so bluntly. There is obviously a more efficient and faster solution to the problem, but I only choose one or two of them to practice.”

On the opposing side, Chen Han, the third debater, responded: "Please pay attention to the opponent's debaters, whether to buy a private car is the citizens' freedom of choice. When solving some public welfare problems, if there are methods that do not infringe on the freedom of choice to choose without infringing on private rights, of course, they should first exhaust the possibilities in this aspect.

If there is really no way, we can choose to infringe on private rights. Therefore, the reason why we feel that we should not limit the number of private cars is based on the social reality that governments at present have not tried their best to restrict public cars, promote new energy, optimize urban planning, etc.

In this case, how much responsibility is for private cars on issues such as congestion and pollution? It is impossible to prove whether the above problems can be completely solved after restricting private cars. Therefore, we require the government to be cautious when implementing a policy that does not necessarily succeed and infringes on citizens' private rights. Isn't it right?"

When Chen Han said this, Yang Weiwei kept listening carefully until Chen Han sat down that she felt relieved.

These words were obviously forced out by Tian Haimo's provocation, so they had to answer. Chen Han was still quite successful and did not complete the ideological trump card.

In the end, he did not say the sentence "For private people, there is no prohibition on the law, and for the government, there is no authorization on the law" - according to the pre-match plan, this kind of big hat and big political label that accuses the other party of extremely incorrect politics is best to suppress the opposition and make it speak by Yang Weiwei in person when the opposition summarizes the statement.

Because the opposition summed up the speech for the last chance for the audience to speak, the positive side had no chance to speak again after the speech.

Therefore, at this time, "using evidence that has been cross-examined the 'fact judgment' part and combined with new and elevated 'value judgment' political labels" can maximize its lethality.

However, it is precisely because these words are hidden, at least it is enough to spread the war.

Yu Meiqin almost responded: "Then I can only say that the opponent's debaters know nothing about public management affairs - governing a big country is like cooking a small freshman. In this ever-changing era, government governance and public management affairs are facing new situations and new problems every day.

If all policy strategies must be proven to be 100% effective and 100% able to solve the current problems before they can be implemented, then there will be no effective government in this world!

Any new countermeasures to solve new problems can be carefully demonstrated, piloted locally, summarized experience, and then promoted. This is administrative common sense. I hope that the other party’s debaters will not ignore administrative common sense and talk about slogans, and be someone who can solve practical problems."

Chen Han was suddenly embarrassed. Fortunately, he had already sat down and he didn't have to answer this question.

"The handling just now was still frivolous. In order to protect the killer, the other words were organized a little too conservatively, which led to being regarded as a scholar who was useless." Yang Weiwei frowned and reflected on Chen Han's small mistake just now.

Since it has been ridiculed as "not doing practical things, only empty talk", this hat has a huge impact on the team in the eyes of the jury, and it is the kind of person who has to fight back head-on.

Yang Weiwei had no choice but to take action in person:

"Since the opponent's debater believes that specific control strategies and implementation rules should be discussed rationally and let us discuss whether it does infringe on the convenience of the people, then we will discuss it - but I have to remind the opponent's debater that today's debate topic is 'Whether the government should control the number of private cars'.

And you have just mentioned many strategies such as "promoting new energy vehicles", which control the "quality" of private cars, not "quantity". Therefore, even if this trick is effective, it cannot be used to support your position today.

It is precisely because you have previously listed specific policies that go beyond the debate topic or are obviously inappropriate that we believe that we should be 'focused and cautious'."

In Yang Weiwei's words, she couldn't help but use the weakness she had spied when she was under pressure from outside the field to visit the set that day.

The competition finally developed to the occasion for MPA personnel to play, that is, the specific policy implementation rules and regulations.

"The debate topic is about the control of the number of private cars. Of course, we will only talk about quantity control on the matter, not quality. There is no need for the opponent to worry about crossing the line." Yu Meiqin felt that she was in a good state of warm-up, and she threw out the only few specific baits she knew while it was hot.

"The specific measures for controlling the number of private cars we envision can be to increase fuel tax standards, license fees, pollution discharge fees, and control them through economic means. The kind of rough behavior that relies on administrative compulsory orders and violates market laws is completely the imagination of the opponent's debaters!"

"Is it just a matter of raising taxes and license fees to control it... This is completely economic means, and it is difficult to attack them to 'rude governance'." Yang Weiwei and the team members thought, thinking that the other party was indeed cunning enough.

But on the field, even if it is just a method of "adding money to limit cars", it is impossible to spray it without asking for spray.

Yang Weiwei winked, and Tang Wen knew that this kind of nonsense should have appeared on her own.

Tang Wen immediately spit out a chicken soup style: "Can you increase money control the number of private cars? After adding money, it was not until you transfer it to the urgent need. Haven't you seen how high the land value-added tax has been increased to the demand for macro-control? What's the price of housing has risen to? What's the price of housing has risen!"

This kind of plausible chicken soup body is still very deceptive to outsiders if it is not exposed.

After all, Chinese people suffer from housing prices. As long as someone mentions this for an analogy, the resonance is almost accurate.

Yu Meiqin always felt that something was wrong with the other party's words, but unfortunately she couldn't expose it in an instant within one or two seconds.

This is completely impossible to prepare in advance before the game, so 100% of the test is the ability to adapt on the spot.

This is also an additional question for distinguishing between the Spray God and the Spray King.

Feng Jianxiong stood up just right and took on this question of urgent intelligence: "Please don't change the concepts! Buying a bus and using a business car belongs to "investment" in the field of economics - buying a house also belongs to investment. However, the behavior of buying a private car belongs to "consumption" in economics. This is completely different.

The opponent's debater actually tried to use the reason that "tax increases cannot limit investment" to deduce that "tax increases do not limit consumption". Isn't this ridiculous? Haven't you seen several times the heavy tax on imported cosmetics? Isn't it obvious that the consumption of imported cosmetics from domestic legal channels has decreased significantly compared with the absence of heavy taxes?"

Chen Han is now silent.

The opposition obviously had to admit defeat by limiting the quantity by collecting money.

That is to be obediently admit that collecting money can control the quantity.

"It's a pity that it cannot prove that 'collecting money may not necessarily have control effect'. Otherwise, we can continue to criticize the other party's 'economic regulation is definitely not good. If we want to control the quantity, we will definitely use the violent and harmonious government of administrative coercion'." Yang Weiwei sighed silently in her heart, but she was helpless.

I can only turn to another attack angle.

Yang Weiwei adjusted her mood and said generously: "Okay, maybe the amount of private cars can be controlled by increasing money. But in a good governance environment where the law is administered, shouldn't the collection of all taxes and fees be 'taken from the people and used for the people'? After the money is collected, it is not the biggest unfair to private car owners after it is received.
Chapter completed!