"If the content product is free, then those practitioners who originally relied on the charges for content publications will instead work in other industries. " "If the content product is free, then the practitioners who originally paid for the content publication will instead work in other industries. " Please answer this question carefully. If you want to answer that you don't agree, please tell me what you think is possible: will those people sit around and wait for death to starve, or how?"

Feng Jianxiong Jizhu asked her first question in her grasp.

The second debater of the Pro-Fang was originally immersed in the depression caused by feeding the dog three times in a row. Now he was reluctant to concentrate, but he felt uncomfortable all over when he listened.

"This is a serious guiding problem. The style of playing is too domineering! Does it conform to the rules of the game?"

Moreover, according to the classic rules, "is it" is a question, and "why" is another question.

"Dear host, I object to the other party's inducing questioning method! He has no right to predict 'if I answer, how to deal with it' before I answer, and that should be two questions."

Teacher Liang, who was standing behind the podium, also frowned and thought for a while, feeling that these words were a bit out of the way and it was difficult to make a decision. So he asked Feng Jianxiong inquiry:

"Student of the Second Defender of the Opposition, please pay attention to your questioning method. Do you have anything to say about the appeal of the Second Defender of the Opposition?"

Unexpectedly, Feng Jianxiong didn't care at all, so he said calmly: "Yes, I can adjust my question. Then I will take back the half sentence 'Please explain why' - now, just answer 'Do you agree'."

This is just a tactic of his.

"You..." After the second debater thought about it, he found that he was still as disgusting as if he had swallowed a flies.

He still only used the other party's chance to ask questions, but the other party blatantly told him that if you answered no, how would you please enjoy you next.

This is a threat, a verge ball, and complies with the rules of the game.

"If I answered no, how should I defend myself? It seems unlikely. Who would be waiting to starve to death? Forget it... I really couldn't think of it, just answer right. After agreeing with the other party's assumption, the other party can no longer ask me to explain "why", and it doesn't make sense to explain it.

However, if I answered 'yes' and, from the other party's standpoint, the next question is probably to continue deriving in the direction of 'Since the free strategy will have a crowding-out effect on certain Internet content providers, wouldn't that just show that the free strategy is harmful to the prosperity of Internet content'... "

He hesitated for more than ten seconds until he was urged by the host Teacher Liang once, and he answered hastily: "I agree with what you said just now... Well, that's the point. After the content is free, practitioners will change their careers. But...but..."

He "but" twice, unable to say the following. When he was anxious, he felt that his left hand was gently poked by his teammates.

He was like a drowning person catching a life-saving straw. He looked at him with his eyes and turned out to be his teammate. The fourth debater Lu Feng saved the scene from the fire and stuffed a small note for him.

Without thinking, he picked up the note and read "but" down.

"But... I want to warn the opponent's debater that this crowding-out effect of practitioners cannot be simply and roughly deduced as 'free strategy is harmful to the prosperity of Internet content'. The socialist market economy theory tells us that it is just a kind of optimization and reconfiguration of resources. Those who are squeezed out will create more useful content and value in other fields."

Although he was stuttering, the question was finally answered, and he used a little more or less a "step ahead and take the initiative to defend" attitude, blocking the opponent's most likely attack point.

However, all this is not very exciting in the eyes of ordinary audiences.

They only saw the positive side's eating behavior ugly trying to avoid being questioned by the opposite side.

"Wow! Another neat and neat force the other party to admit his point of view directly? Student Feng played this trick very well. This was how he dealt with Qin Mingren, the main player of the Academy of Digital Sciences, in the last game." Several girls from the law school thought so.

Yu Meiqin, who was still in the soy sauce time on the bench, had her mouth slightly raised when she saw this: "Although Feng was a little suspicious of using rules to beat the edge, she completely suppressed the other party in her aura. The other party not only admitted it directly, but also hesitated for more than ten seconds. It was enough for the judges and hosts to see clearly that they only admitted it after being forced to exhaust all possibilities."

After hearing the whispers in the audience, the judges of this audience had another scale in their hearts: "It's not exactly the same. After all, this time it was a deterrent. But one of the questions threatened the other party, 'If you don't answer, I will ask how I ask', and the answering party threatened, 'I know you might ask, but I'm prepared, please don't ask that', these two things have completely different auras."

This is easy to understand. It is like a threat. If someone who uses a knife to threaten you: if you don’t leave it and buy money, you will be chopped up. That will naturally be very domineering.

But if the robbed threatens: I have a knife! Don’t come over! I really know how to use a knife!

Then no matter how you look at it, it seems like you are strong outside and do the middle.

"Oh? The opponent's debater actually thought that 'the people who were squeezed away were all optimized and allocated human resources for the market economy'? This interpretation was beyond my expectations. You seem to think that you guessed what I wanted to ask for the second question - OK, then I'll change another question at the moment."

Seeing that his question was accepted by the other party, Feng Jianxiong was still very calm. He thought about it and took out a form from a pile of evidence materials on the table, and asked leisurely:

"I have a statistical table here. The data is absolutely true. It reflects the statistics of Internet marketing practitioners in a county called Anxi, Fujian Province in recent years. The sources of the data include the public security network supervision department, QQIP monitoring data from Tengyun Company, and data from local mobile companies.

According to this table, from 2003 to this year, there were 14,000 to 17,000 people engaged in Internet marketing in AX County. In 2003, more than 90% of the employees' working model were to send messages to promote Tieguanyin in major QQ groups, and since 2004, they also joined the Baidu Tieba sales channel.

But starting this year, due to netizens' disgust with Tieguanyin's saturated marketing bombing, as well as the ban and rectification of Tengyun and Baidu, the number of people selling Tieguanyin has dropped below 60%, and there is still a trend of continuing to decline year by year - and the same group of people who were squeezed out have embarked on the road of telecom fraud - according to the monitoring of mobile companies - I would like to ask the other debaters, do you think that the squeeze out of this kind of industry practitioner is also the "optimization and re-allocation of human resources in the market economy"?"

When Feng Jianxiong threw out this mysterious example, everyone in the audience was shocked.

This is a phenomenon that all people who use QQ and mobile phones will be exposed to in their lives, but no one has ever thought about the connection behind all this.

So much so that when the big data behind these facts are pointed out, everyone is incredible and terrifying.

"Huh? Are the people who sell tea in the QQ group the same group of people who are scammed by mobile winning text messages? It's unlikely!"

"But it seems that the other party has really done a very detailed investigation, I really didn't expect it. This perspective of looking at the problem is too much... How could I think of all the inspiration for this classmate to associate these two seemingly unrelated things?"

When looking at the Xinchuan Academy’s reaction to this issue, there was no doubt that everyone was stunned.

Just judging whether the facts Feng Jianxiong said were true is enough for them to figure out for a few minutes before they can come back to their senses.

"Please answer the second debater of the Pro-State Party!" Seeing that the debaters of the Xinchi Academy were whispering there, they seemed to have forgotten the rules of the competition. They finally made their professional qualities come back to their senses, and immediately issued a reminder.

On the side of the Xinchuan Academy, the fourth debater Lu Feng protested: "We...we question the factual arguments provided by the other party themselves! We think this is not true! If it is not true, this question naturally cannot be answered."

Teacher Liang turned to Feng Jianxiong and asked: "Does the second debater of the opposing party have any explanations for the other party's doubts?"

Feng Jianxiong said calmly: "Please pay attention to the other party's debaters. Now it is a cross-questioning session, not a free debate session. You only have the right to answer my questions, and there is no right to directly ask. If you have any doubts about the authenticity of the factual evidence, you can add the premise assumption that "if this evidence is true" before answering.

As for me, I can guarantee that all the data on the factual arguments I just mentioned come from authoritative statistics and are for everyone to verify their source during the free debate or after the game. If the source is not true, we are willing to bear the consequences of losing the game."

Feng Jianxiong said so, and the teammates of the Xinchuan Academy had nothing else to do except look at each other.

This kind of epic span is really incredible.

After hesitation, the second debater of the Xinchi Academy could only endure the disgust like swallowing a fly: "If... I mean, if the factual premise of this problem is true, we feel that this situation cannot be regarded as what we just said, "The market hand optimizes and reconfigurates human resources."

When they said this, their eyes were filled with resentment, "Wait! It's time to come to the free debate, and you must provide evidence to prove that the facts you quoted are all true! This matter is not over!"

Although the opponent was very depressed, Feng Jianxiong, who had won the battle forcibly, could not see any joy at all.

"It's a pity that I'm wasting a chance to ask questions. It seems that the only way to drag the decisive battle to the free debate."

When he pondered so deeply, he couldn't help but think of the line in the plot of "Golden Gun" killing "002" in Stephen Chow's movie "Domestic 007": "Grand Gunner! Wasting a bullet from me!"
Chapter completed!