"Ahem... Student Feng, pay attention to your tone. Everyone discusses the issue. Although you have always made sense, there is no need to be so aggressive." Although Professor Gu supported Feng Jianxiong's point of view, he did not want him to lose his etiquette and couldn't help but remind him.

"I'm sorry, Professor Gu, I was indignant and eager to uphold justice just now, so I was a little anxious." Feng Jianxiong explained in a humble and arrogant manner, then turned to Fu Chengcai and said,

"According to your logic, you meet a righteous man and do a righteous act, and then you go up and praise him: 'Oh, you are so moral, you are a role model inspired by morality!' Then he should thank you? It's ridiculous! Believe it or not, some people will slap you to death!"

Feng Jianxiong said this and restrained a little, asking Professor Gu: "Professor, I really want to prove this point of view. I need to tell a story. It may be a bit long. If you don't mind me being verbose, then I'll prove it."

"Please give me some advice." Professor Gu was also quite interested.

"Okay," Feng Jianxiong cleared his throat and said, "Let's assume that Fu Chengcai successfully traveled back to Germany 500 years ago - no, it should be said to be the Holy Roman Empire.

On that day, a foreign businessman named Fernando, who had been doing business in the Champagne Fair in the Flanders area, passed Mainz Cathedral and found a confession to the young diocese bishop.

He took out a dozen indulgences he bought from the Archbishop Von Brandenburg, who was in charge of the entire diocese of the Shenluo Empire a few days ago, and said to the bishop of the diocese Martin Luther: I often do business and fraud, lend money, and even make people die, and I feel uneasy. So I bought indulgences, but I am still uneasy. Please comfort me..."

When Feng Jianxiong's example was mentioned here, Professor Gu couldn't help but smile slightly, as if he had a tacit understanding.

He did not study history, but he still knew this story very well.

Because he usually likes to use Milton's "On Freedom of Press" to let students write papers and read the reviews. Milton's "On Freedom of Press" was born in 1644, and was in the Thirty Years' War (1618~1648).

The essence of the Thirty Years' War was a war of breaking between Protestantism and the Catholic Bishop. After the war, all German states had to choose sides and support one of them.

The right to "freedom of publishing" is the product of the victory of Protestantism. The source of Protestantism was the Martin Lutheran Reformation in 1517.

Therefore, Feng Jianxiong's example really touched Professor Gu's itch, and his heart was filled with resonance. Even if he didn't learn history, he would not not learn this history.

I only heard Feng Jianxiong continue to talk:

"Martin Luther must ask Fernando: Then have you truly repent? Will you continue to lend money and continue to make debts and make people lose their lives to make them lose their lives?

Fernando thought about it and said: Were loans must be released! But next time I commit a crime of fraud, I will pay another 30 Florin to buy an indulgence coupon!

Of course Martin Luther would let him get out.

Fernando would point at the other party’s nose and curse: I bought indulgences from your boss, Archbishop Feng Brandenburg, the regional sales director! I came to you today not to beg you, but to ask you for after-sales service!

Then Martin Luther quit his hand and went back to write the "95 Points Outline", and nailed the door of Mainz Cathedral, asking Archbishop Feng Brandenburg to swear war, it was not a debate, and from then on, he freed millions of people from the indulgences that deceived the world and stole their reputations, and his merits were immeasurable——”

When Feng Jianxiong said this, he turned to Fu Chengcai just in time, and then guessed in a questioning tone: "I believe that if Senior Fu traveled back 500 years ago and saw this scene with his own eyes, he would definitely walk up and flattered Mr. Martin Luther: Mr. Luther, you are really a noble person who dares to expose ugliness and promote righteous deeds - is that true?"

Fu Chengcai didn't grasp the point of the story at all, and his eyes turned around for a while: "Is there something wrong with this?"

"That's a pity - because in history, someone has already said to Mr. Martin Luther. If you do this, the consequences of the exchange will probably be to be slapped by Mr. Luther and then respond to you: MMP! I have been revelated! As long as everyone is pious, they can spontaneously feel the will of the Lord from the heart without having to corruption!

All the decisions I made today are because I felt the projection of apocalypse, and you actually insulted me and said that I did this based on human virtues? Believe it or not, I will slap you to death?"

The biggest difference between Protestant ethics and the Heaven-Biography in the issue of accepting God’s enlightenment is that the former believes that God’s revelation is spontaneously felt by the devouts, while the latter believes that you must “enlighten” through the church (using this word for the time being).

With Martin Luther's temperament, he would really do this when he encountered such a situation.

Although Feng Jianxiong's storytelling method is very funny and casual, the topic effect is surprisingly good on a few occasions.

In particular, Professor Gu 100% accepted the view that “morality is not nobler than faith. Anyway, as long as you do righteous deeds, as long as you want to do righteous deeds in your heart, there is no distinction between good and bad based on the specific motivation.”

Many people do good things because of their faith. If you say they do good things because of morality, they might be anxious about you.

Fu Chengcai's last attack point on Feng Jianxiong's character was also killed by Feng Jianxiong.

However, how could Feng Jianxiong let this dog fall into the water easily?

Anyone who provokes must take heavy measures to deter them.

"You have nothing to say? OK, then I'll say a few words - what was the occasion that day? It was a debate competition. The viewpoint of the debate competition was decided by both sides by lottery, not by me, or even by me. This is an occasion to train eloquence and thinking ability, and it can actually be politically correct. How sensitive are you?

If I had drawn the opposing debate topic at that time, 'Food and clothing are not necessary conditions for morality', can I win if I believe it or not? Is it related to my own opinions and political tendencies? No matter what question I draw, for the sake of competitive spirit, I should have exhausted all legal means to win. Is this wrong? It can also be linked to character? According to your logic, the lawyer is sympathizing with the criminals to get rid of the suspect's crime?"

"Please don't brag about the awesomeness that has nothing to do with the interview!"

Seeing that Fu Chengcai was speechless by Feng Jianxiong, his face turned red, white and blue. A low-pity female voice reminded him just right, interrupting Feng Jianxiong's pursuit.

Feng Jianxiong looked up and saw that it was Wang Yan, the female judge who was ranked last today.

"Where did I offend this woman? It seems that Fu Chengcai attacked me, and this guy was also provoking me?" Feng Jianxiong thought quickly.

Although Wang Yan was one of the three judges, the other party's vague targeting him also aroused Feng Jianxiong's pride.

He stared at the other party proudly and said tactfully: "I'm just stating the facts and not bragging."

Anyway, he could see that Director Dai and Professor Gu appreciated his eloquence and practical knowledge, not to mention that this is just an opportunity for hosts at the school stage, and it would be a pity to lose it.

It would never be worth it to ask him to compromise on this little profit.

It’s not that Feng Jianxiong is not able to bend and stretch, but that the chip is not worthy of it - if someone now buys several hundred million to buy Feng Jianxiong for a while, he can consider it.

"You are not bragging? Then you mean that you are very confident and firmly believe that you can win the debate topic in turn?" As a judge, Wang Yan was also a little angry and embarrassed by Feng Jianxiong's fierce criticism.

When following the mentor, Wang Yan was always cautious, but thinking about Weng Dechen's promise, she took the risk to persuade Professor Gu in his ear:

"Professor, I think this is not the case. Anyway, the scheduled interview time period is not over yet. If you and Director Dai are not very busy, just listen to Feng Jianxiong and Fu Chengcai exchanged debate topics and confronted them on the spot.

This is also true to confirm whether Feng Jianxiong said those sensitive words in the debate because of his professional ethics, or is his political tendency inherently disharmonious?"

Professor Gu said carefully: "The more you argue, the more you become clearer, and this kind of collision of ideas is still worth encouraging. But isn't it a bit hasty? And it may not be fair. What do you think, Master Dai?"

After a debater uses the prosecution to beat the opponent to a complete decent position, the opponent will obviously master all his advantages and debate skills. At this time, the difficulty of exchanging positions between the two sides is not ordinary.

It means that all the tricks that the winning side has come up with exhausting their IQ before will be used by their opponents.

It was like a martial arts master competing with Gusu Murong, who was hit by the other party's movements. "The higher the martial arts skills, the more miserable the death situation will be."

Of course, it is not that the positive side of such a debate will definitely not win.

For example, once the strength of the two sides is too different, the positive side will keep the opponent for the first time and use only three successful forces to kill the opponent in seconds.

At this time, even if the opponent returns these three success forces, we can use the seven success forces to play the second round, and it is possible to win.

However, this means that the strength gap between the two sides is large enough, almost as big as the gap between the East Evil and the West Crazy and the Seven Monsters of Jiangnan.

Professor Gu naturally felt that it was a bit unfair.

"I'm not busy anyway." Master Dai smiled and kind to others.

After Wang Yan got the Shangfang sword, he officially drew down: "Feng Jianxiong, do you dare to accept this test?"

Feng Jianxiong smiled proudly: "Haha, is this just the debate topic? Change it, I can't help it - I'm going to say that the people from the Academy of Mathematics Science were not worthy of me to use all my strength. If I beat them, it would be Yang Guo who killed Ke Zhenye in seconds."

Wang Yan's heart thrust a little, thinking that it was indeed a bit inappropriate.

After all, Fu Chengcai didn't prepare this debate topic very carefully. He just leaked the question two days ago and hinted that the other party would temporarily cram after blocking Feng Jianxiong.

Feng Jianxiong must have been deeply immersed in that debate topic, and maybe he really kept awesome backhand.

Of course she didn't know that Feng Jianxiong was actually not prepared for anything at the beginning, and he was completely reborn before the game.

"Well, we won't take advantage of you, let's do this, extend it a little, and change the topic." Wang Yan hesitated for a while, trying to change the topic without taking any action.

In order to make it possible for Feng Jianxiong to be abolished in advance.

However, in front of Professor Gu, Wang Yan should not do too blatantly and shamelessly. Although he should change the topic, he should be more natural. Try to appear to be derived from the original topic and should not be made up out of thin air. It is best to make Professor Gu feel that the topic is appropriate and nodded in person. Otherwise, Professor Gu might suspect that this debate topic was colluded with Fu Chengcai in advance.

"It's up to you." Feng Jianxiong looked fearless.
Chapter completed!