"Please pay attention to the rules of the competition! Now is the cross-question session! Your questioning opportunity has been used just now, and you can only answer the questions of the third debate of the positive side. If you have any questions, you can continue in the free debate session!"

Sure enough, the next second, host Su Qin helped Feng Jianxiong to rescue the situation.

It also knocked down the rhythm that the Academy of Digital Sciences finally brought up to the abyss.

Only then did the people from the Academy of Digital Sciences notice that their third debater had just been so embarrassed that they even forgot about the rules of the competition and the link they are in now!

This is a debate competition! A field of wits that is proud of being calm and meticulous!

If one party is so angry that he is so angry that he even forgets the rules of the game, it shows how chaotic his mind is.

This is a heavy blow to one side's strength and image in the eyes of the jury.

Feng Jianxiong reaped a wave of impression points in the quiet years, so calm that he was terrible.

Then he spoke slowly:

"Dear host, I really want to answer this rhetorical question from the other party's debater. It is just to respect the rules of the competition, so I didn't answer immediately. Now I hope to apply: If the host and the other party's debater agree, my answer will not waste the last chance to ask a question, and it does not limit my time to state this question, then I can answer immediately. Please make a decision by the host!"

“Wow…”

There was an uproar again.

After everyone chewed and analyzed the rebellious question just now, they found it difficult to answer.

Feng Jianxiong's partial victory before was just a surprise attack in the eyes of most people.

They all felt that Feng Jianxiong must rely on the rules of the game and avoided this rhetorical question first.

Who knew that he was so arrogant!

This attitude is clearly saying: Brother, a "anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-anti-

If the rules and you are willing to be against me, then I don’t mind just throwing you in seconds!

It simply despises the other party's questioning as if nothing!

Su Qin was also excited. In fact, he also wanted to hear how Feng Jianxiong answered this question. After silenced as the host for a few seconds, he asked the Third Defender of the Academy of Digital Sciences with an official accent: "Do you agree with the other party's suggestion?"

"I...I...I...I of course agree!" Qin Mingren, whose momentum was suppressed, became panicked again.

Feng Jianxiong smiled slightly and began to talk:

"Just just now, the other debater questioned, saying, 'If those who are kind and ambition do righteous deeds in desperate situations, not because of morality, but because of other motives'? I can answer positively now.

As we all know, what is morality? It is just a code of conduct used by human society to regulate human behavior.

Please note the short sentence: Morality is a standard of behavioral norms.

From another perspective, this sentence means that human society has many behavioral norms, and morality is just one of them.

So, what are the common social behavior norms? The theories of each school are similar. I know that the opponent's debater is studying mathematics and does not know much about jurisprudence, so I will not bully him. I will directly choose a school to announce the answer.

For example, according to the doctrines of the "utilitarian legal school" masters Blackstone and Jimmy Bentham, the norms of behavior in human society can be roughly divided into four categories: nature, morality, law, and religion. Of course, you can also quote the opinions of different schools and discuss them later, but I think this basically does not affect the debate topic.

In Jimmy Bentham's division, nature is also called desire, which is the code of conduct of "obeying human nature and original desire". The last three are more or less contrary to human nature, but the specific ways of violation are slightly different.

Morality is to know that bad things cannot be done, and to take the initiative to self-discipline and not want to do things.

The law is to know that bad things cannot be done, but passively be forced and restricted by the outside world and dare not do it.

Religion, or faith, does not know why bad things cannot be done, but is brainwashed by the outside world and does not know why it is not done, but still does not do it.

As our debater said, among the examples of poor people who are poor but not yet fully starved to death by the other party, perhaps only prove that "some people with lofty ideals have lower thresholds for food and clothing than normal people, and their minds are firmer." Therefore, these examples cannot be used to prove the argument that "they do not even have food and clothing, but are still talking about morality" because they are still food and clothing.

As for the example of the other debater's later cited by "people who can even give up their lives for the sake of righteousness", I can't help but ask: Maybe they really don't have enough food and clothing, but is this courage to fight to the death really because of morality?

There were so many censors and censors in the Ming Dynasty. They pursued being beaten to death by the emperor's court stick and wanted to "speak for justice", but everyone knew that most of them were pursuing "letting a name in history". I don't think this kind of person is based on morality, but instead thinks that this is a kind of religious brainwashing with no human nature, a kind of person who is struggling with no idea why, and crazy pursuit of the sunken costs that have been spent - just like Hai Rui let his daughter starve to death, this has nothing to do with morality at all!

Those who block the holes of guns and bomb the bunkers... Sorry, for political correctness, I have no intention of evaluating those people, but everyone can also put aside political correctness and think about it yourself. The so-called "sense of military honor" is sometimes a religious worship? I don't think that the morality in this world is practiced by calling people to die - my answer is over."

Silence, a terrifying temporary silence.

The host Su Qin's eyes were as big as a copper bell, and bloodshot burst out.

Yu Meiqin's eyes were blurred and she felt lost.

As Feng Jianxiong's teammate, Sniker was proud and felt that he was floating.

Chen Sicong and Fu Yiming, who were nothing else, were ashamed and admired and mixed feelings.

Weng Dechen was already numb.

The girls from the law school off the court held their breath and seemed to be afraid of missing the echo.

Those from the Academy of Digital Sciences were weak all over, as if the competition had ended.

But in fact, there are still 20 minutes left in the game - 15 minutes of free debate, plus summary statements from both sides.

However, why do everyone feel that the game has been decided?

"What angle is this? It's so unexpected! Some people don't refute factual and behavioral levels from the perspective of "poor until death can do good things", but from "even if a poor person does good things, it cannot prove that he does good things based on morality" this motivation and thought is under the weakness of the connection between motive and thought?"

"And if you follow the jurisprudence of Blackstone and Jimmy... it seems that they are two British scholars? If all self-discipliness that are not endogenous and aimless, are considered adjustments to the 'religious' norms, today's topic cannot be argued!"

...

One minute later, the free debate began.

The Academy of Digital Sciences attacked desperately, but it was very messy and had no rules.

Because they had never expected Feng Jianxiong's counterattack angle at all, they did not make any preparations for this pre-match.

But they can't find information and pass notes on the spot. They no longer have a chance.

However, the law school suddenly discovered that the logic that Feng Jianxiong had just organized was simply a panacea that caught people off guard.

"The person who blocks the gun hole is noble? Maybe he just wants to trade death for the reputation of Pravda! How do you prove that he is for the cause of great and just?"

"Wen dies to advise, Wu dies to fight? One truth! If the opponent's debater insists on feeling that it is moral to give up his life for a goal, then is the guards who fought for the head of state until the last person in the National H Building very moral? A white cloth strip with the words "Seven Lifes Being Prayed to Death in Fight" wrapped around his forehead, and then rushed towards the Mid-Armed Warship, is it more moral?"

"Even Boyi and Shuqi may have been to participate in "Records of the Grand Historian", or because he was kidnapped by his reputation simply because of his high status before, he was kidnapped by his own reputation."

"Mythical kidnapping is also called morality? It is forced, not sincere. When morality becomes moral kidnapping, it is already a kind of religious fanaticism! Only those who know the truth and the reason are qualified to be called morality!"

Some of these words can be said directly, while others cannot be said directly for political correctness.

However, freshmen from the School of Law have a good talent for embellishing the rhetoric in this regard. Moreover, most of the free debates are Feng Jianxiong CARRY, and the pace of the School of Digital Sciences is quickly broken.

Qin Mingren of the Academy of Digital Sciences led his teammates to fight to the death, but retreated step by step.

They finally took another bet, trying to introduce other schools of "definition classification of human behavior codes" in free debate, but it was useless, because no matter what their definitions were based on their definitions, addition to morality, law, religion or belief, they were all refuted by Feng Jianxiong in a wide range of citations. Especially those examples of "not knowing why but still practicing fanatically" were simply targets.

Soon, we reached the final summary and speech stage.

The opposing side summarized the statements, part of which was written in advance, but when he was reciting, the Fourth Debate of the Academy of Sciences was interrupted several times and changed his words temporarily. If some of the settings were well set, he was embarrassed to read this situation.

But when Snicker summarized the statement, she was full of energy.

Feng Jianxiong prepared three sets of plans for her, and the current situation is obviously the most suitable to read the first one directly, and it is also the one with Feng Jianxiong's most energy.

Sniker's voice is cute and gentle, and he said a bunch of long comments in a pure and simple manner:

"...Student, do you know that there is a concept called "sinking cost" in economics? That is to say, if a person previously invested in something, the more costs it is impossible for him to recover, the more difficult it is for him to turn back and change his course. For example, a clean official who has been fighting for fifty years and does not charge black money, then he obviously wants to be honest until he dies. The price of wanting him to lose his integrity in his later years is much greater than that of corrupting a normal person!

Many people who talk about morality all their lives may be doing good things based on morality in their daily lives. But when facing life and death decisions, they may just be because they have invested too much sunken costs in their reputation in morality throughout their lives, so they can only use religious loyalty to support the last journey of their lives...

The above common sense is enough to prove that many examples of "we should talk about morality without food and clothing" that the opponent's debaters have already mentioned in this scene, in fact, they cannot withstand the motivation to think about it. We really don't want to elaborate on them one by one..."

After Sniker sat down, the audience at the Academy of Digital Sciences was left with only grief and sighing.
Chapter completed!