"Who is willing to accept the challenge of this question? This question is a veto system." Nan Xiaoniao finally confirmed.

Five of the remaining six people in the field raised their hands. Only one Snicker looked around and bit his lip. It seemed that he knew his strength was limited, so he chose to retreat.

She would rather accumulate points slowly.

Nan Xiaoniao looked around and saw so many juniors who were facing the challenge, she was happy to save trouble.

"Then let me explain the origin of this question first. As a veteran, I believe everyone may have had my experience: I usually have to memorize a lot of things to cope with exams. But in fact, when it comes to the case, it is useless at all. The key is how to apply the laws well. However, it is completely unnecessary to memorize, you can check the book.

So, today I spent a lot of effort to find this question - the relevant laws and regulations, which have been written to you clearly. When I open the paper, I will test everyone's ability to explain. The original question is multiple-choice questions, but since I am used for an interview, I definitely cannot rely on my own mistakes. I also have to explain the reasons clearly. If the reason is wrong, even if the answer is correct, it will be considered as losing the election."

In order to show her selflessness, Nan Xiaoniao explained the concept of today's proposition, and then sent the paper. When she was about, she did not forget to remind her.

"People should pay attention to the trap here. This question was a candidate question issued by Dean Gong as a member of the judicial examination team last year. In the end, it was too difficult and was not selected into the official judicial examination paper."

Students from the Law School basically know the faculty market of our school.

Dean Gong is a detached person in school. He usually doesn’t care about things and gives it to the Executive Vice President for cooking.

Because President Gong's original administrative level was higher than President Song, he used to be the president of the Provincial High Court and was a provincial cadre; while Jinling Normal University was only a provincial university, and President Song's administrative level was only at the department level. When President Song was still begging his father to sue, he rehired the retired Dean Gong, the great god, and entitled the name of the Dean of the Law School.

Just like the "academician workstations" of various universities, they only make money and make money. In fact, they only see academicians for two days a year.

However, President Gong's remaining energy in the judicial administration system is still there and he still participates in the judicial department's question-setting work all year round.

So when several interviewers heard the origin of the question Nan Xiaoniao gave, they immediately became respectful. After all, the most difficult questions in the judicial examination are often more than 90%, which means that only a few of the 100 candidates can answer correctly. How sinister is it to be defeated because of their difficulties?

After getting the test, Feng Jianxiong also reviewed the question like everyone else, which seemed very simple.

"After a certain hijacking-the aircraft criminal hijacked a flight with bombs, firearms and other weapons, he thought he was alone and needed to develop an accomplice. He picked out a male passenger and asked him to kill another female passenger as a "vote for his name" and punished the ground military and police for not cooperating with the conditions he issued.

The hijacker also claimed that if the male passenger did not kill the female passenger, he would detonate the plane and kill everyone. It was later confirmed that the hijacker had the ability and motivation to practice his threat.

In this critical situation, the male passenger had exhausted all the possibility of escape from danger and failed. He had to sacrifice his fellow women in exchange for the lives of the entire aircraft.

May I ask: Which of the following statements is the following: A, threatening the accomplice; B, self-defense; C, emergency avoidance; D, no expectation possibility; E, threatening the accomplice, but there is a statutory reason for exemption and does not bear criminal liability; F, threatening the accomplice, but can be exempted from punishment."

If it is a normal judicial examination question, it will be over here.

However, there is an appendix on the paper produced by Nan Xiaoniao, which clearly states a lot of legal concepts such as "self-defense", "emergency avoidance", "provoking accomplices", "not expectant possibility" and so on.

In other words, this question does not test any endorsement ability, but you will tell you all the conditions. The key is to look at the ability to analyze words by word.

"This is obviously a threatening accomplice, right? Although that man killed someone, he was obviously forced to do so, and he didn't think about it himself." A boy who participated in the interview whispered, and didn't know if he really thought so or misleading others.

Another girl who heard it curled her lips and subconsciously realized that it was someone else who wanted to mislead her: "Hmph, this question is obviously an emergency risk avoidance! First of all, although the man's own life is also in imminent danger, his solution is not to fight back against the invaders, so how could it be self-defense? So this interference item was eliminated at once. And for the sake of greater personal and even public interests, it is obviously an emergency risk avoidance!"

However, Nan Xiaoniao has repeatedly emphasized that this question is very sinister.

So even though I felt that the result was obvious, no one dared to answer rashly for a while. Instead, I started to make up for it.

"Can the hijacker be mentally ill? The man himself has no ability to act? What else is there for the woman... No, it's not mentioned in these questions, so I shouldn't think too much..."

Five minutes later, Nan Xiaoniao announced that she would stop writing.

"Tell me your answers, come one by one."

Nan Xiaoniao seemed to know that Feng Jianxiong was of high quality - after all, he had also watched the school debate competition - so he and Yu Meiqin ranked last.

The remaining three interviewees answered one by one. One of them struggled repeatedly and chose to "detect the accomplice but exempt from criminal responsibility", while the other girl chose to "emergency avoidance".

Of course, when they explained, they had done all kinds of clever words and despicable things - they also suspected that the difficulty of this question was not the options, but the explanation.

The third interviewer was a sophomore boy, who looked a little more solid in his skills. He chose "no expectation possibility", but he was obviously confused and had no clear reason.

Nan Xiaoniao never commented. She had to wait for the five people to finish it, so as not to let the people behind her get rid of the nagging - although everyone's outline of the explanation had been required to be recorded.

"The fourth one, Feng Jianxiong, you said." Nan Xiaoniao looked at him with a little expectation, as if she hoped that he could create miracles.

In September, President Gong gave some well-known academic masters in the institute, and there was nothing wrong with this question.

Feng Jianxiong stood up and cleared his throat: "I think the behavior of the man coerced in this question is 'not expected' from a criminal law perspective, that is, he cannot be expected to do other legal behavior patterns."

"Why?" Nan Xiaoniao continued to ask routinely, why is the key.

Feng Jianxiong took a breath and talked freely: "There is no need to be distinguished between threatened accomplices and legitimate defense, right? People on earth can distinguish them. I think the most sinister difficulty of this question is to distinguish between two interference items: emergency risk avoidance and lack of expectation.

In the composition of emergency risk avoidance, one requirement is roughly "for the sake of a legal and legitimate legal interests, one has to sacrifice a smaller legal interests of oneself or a third party." Therefore, the key here is "sacrifice" - the sacrifice here is a sacrifice in the legal sense, not a sacrifice in the literary sense. It does not mean that anyone who dies for the purpose of others or justice is called sacrifice.

The legal "sacrifice" is a process of weighing: A is given up in order for B to be harmed; the abdicated A is called "sacrifice".

But what about the question? The hijacker said that if he did not kill the man's female companion, he would blow up the plane and kill everyone - everyone included this woman. So whether the man killed or not, the female companion would have to die. The only difference is whether other passengers on the same plane would die.

In this case, how can this woman’s death be ‘sacrifice’ at the French level? No matter how a man chooses, she will die. Therefore, her death is not a sacrifice, and it cannot constitute an ‘emergency avoidance’. It can only be ‘objectively not having the possibility of expecting the man not to kill the woman’.”

"Paipapapa~" Nan Xiaoniao couldn't help but clapped her hands.

The reason Feng Jianxiong said is exactly the same as the standard answer.

She was wrong with this question at the beginning. However, no one reminded her at that time, "This question is very sinister." It took her only two minutes to choose "emergency avoidance".

"Since my attitude is clear, there seems to be no need for the subsequent interview. Finally, that person... well, Yu Meiqin, please give me your outline of answers."

Yu Meiqin handed Nan Xiaoniao her answer sheet with both hands. Nan Xiaoniao looked at it roughly and the answer was the same, and the explanation was slightly different, but the reason was also correct.

It is obvious that this pair of dogs and men already have the potential to be lawyers and can dig out all the points of evil enemies as much as possible from every word.

Nan Xiaoniao announced with a smile: "Feng Jianxiong and Yu Meiqin, these two classmates were selected. The other three students who answered the wrong answer also thank everyone for their support, but it's a pity... In addition, Snicker left it alone. You didn't accept the challenge of this question just now, so I will test you another way."

...

15 minutes later, downstairs of the complex building, Snicker left with a tired but relieved look on his face.

Feng Jianxiong and Yu Meiqin were already waiting for her there.

"How is it?" Yu Meiqin asked with concern.

"I've passed too!" Sniker rushed up and hugged Yu Meiqin, and turned around twice, "I'm so lucky. Senior Sister Nan thought it was not enough to recruit two people. My strength was actually not very good, but she saw that I was very cautious and barely enough, and the others were eliminated, so she left me behind."

After saying that, Sniker took a look at her hair, turned to Feng Jianxiong, and said shyly and earnestly: "I will take care of me more in the future, and I will definitely not be able to find the case."

"Don't worry, as long as you are willing to do it and can endure hardships, are you still afraid that you will be fine?" Feng Jianxiong comforted easily.

This ending is also good.

Although Snicker does not have the ability to join the school team, she can still continue to walk three people at the legal aid center.
Chapter completed!