An article from the UK made normal people happy, the movie "Sky" shines brightly, and the "big birds" are a little angry and embarrassed.

Many Chinese people do not know much about Western history, but these "big children" who admire foreign countries are particularly clear about the situation in the West.

The predecessor of the United States was the British colony.

The establishment of the United States is also the act of British immigration.

Therefore, the source of spiritual civilization in the entire Western world is not in the United States, but in the United Kingdom.

Therefore, a "reflective" article from the source of spiritual beliefs of the "big child" in China spread, allowing a large number of foreigners and thieves to break the defense together.

"This is a personal behavior, and it does not mean the idea of ​​their entire society, okay!"

"One person's reflection makes you so arrogant and your national confidence!"

"Every country has unpatriotic people, I think this British is such a person!"

Good guy, he is a thief and even says others are a thief. He is really a group of mad dogs with extreme psychological distortion.

However, what these "big birds" don't know is that the person who published this article is not only a well-known person in Europe, but also an editor-in-chief of the Times.

With the support of his own channels, his article soon became a hot search in European countries.

The reason why such articles have become a hot search in Europe is that European countries have been unhappy with the UK for a long time.

Britain has always claimed to be the source of world civilization and the birthplace of the world's industrial system. In order to show its strength and authority during the Great Distance, the British royal family used tough means to become the co-lord of European countries and global colonies.

Such "spiritual colonization" has always influenced the world and Europe to this day, and has also made the British proud to this day.

But now Britain's strength no longer exists, but Britain's arrogance has not disappeared, which makes European countries very upset to see Britain.

But with the support of the United States behind the UK, there is no way for all countries to use it.

Now I read an article that made the United Kingdom lose all its face spread. Then countries naturally have to watch the show. Not only did they not stop the public opinion caused by the article, they also secretly promoted the fire and widely spread the article.

Once a thing is hot enough, there will always be many things that are contrary to Tiangang.

Just like the situation in China, no matter how excellent it is, there are always a group of people who will unreasonably slander just to take advantage of the popularity to attract people's attention.

Such two-sided public opinion is also suitable for the global media market.

A few days ago, the remarks of the entire Western world slandering the Sky Wall were popular, crushing the voices of support, causing public opinion to show a one-sided negative situation.

But now, this article in the UK has become a hot search and the situation changes instantly.

Domestic media will follow the trend, while Western media will follow the trend even more.

And it is a public opinion of a major reversal, which is equivalent to a newly released "profit-seeking trend" that has opened its doors to the media.

So, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Norway, etc., capital media or self-media, made the public opinion trend change in a turbulent manner, and praised the "Sky" in various ways, and the news topics praising China were as fierce as volcanic eruptions.

#The excellence of "Sky" is not inferior to "Avatar", #China is the fastest developing country in the world#,#UK: China surpasses us, what if we want to retaliate against us, online and wait for plans, urgent!#...

Some reports with tricky analytical angles of events have been seen, which has greatly praised many people in the Western world, and has also helped "Sky" to make a big splash.

[As we all know, movies, TV, animation, and games are the four major sectors of cultural output.

However, the general public only knows the issue of cultural export, but few people know the strong performance of these four major sectors in industrial domestic demand and technical support.

Take Nvidia as an example. The world's most powerful and profitable computer giant, people only know that its chip development and manufacturing capabilities are very powerful.

But how many people know that the reason why this company has strong chip research and development capabilities is because of games?

Some people may say, what does chips have to do with games?

Then I tell you, the relationship is very deep.

Without high-end chips, how to make high-end graphics cards?

Without a high-end graphics card, how to develop a 3A gaming masterpiece?

Without the computing power of high-end graphics cards, how can we develop high-end game engines to create those large online games on the market?

And what benefits can these games bring to the development of chips?

What I want to say is that as long as global users who buy NVIDIA's graphics card and install it into the host, download games to play games, NVIDIA will collect data on graphics card operation through the background.

This comes from graphics card operation data contributed by global game users. Chip development technicians can find shortcomings or vulnerabilities from the data, thereby researching and upgrading their chips, thus allowing Nvidia to monopolize or lead the global chip high-tech market.

Chips can not only act on games, but also on artificial intelligence, military industry, etc. As long as industries related to computers are the core needs of them.

Seeing this, I think everyone should understand that Nvidia uses the game market to obtain massive data. After obtaining the data, it calculates that the chips are not enough to be updated. While the new generation of chips continues to lead the world, it will also be widely used in various industries around the world to carry out a new round of wealth harvesting.

This is why Nvidia has an extremely exaggerated market value of US$3 trillion, and it is also why this company has been vigorously developing the game market and stakes in major game companies including Riot.

After understanding the relationship between chips and gaming, we will take a look at the movies.

Take the popular Chinese movie "Sky" as an example. Last year, when I went to Beijing to watch the Olympics, I learned about some of the situation in this country.

The rest of the situation is not mentioned, and it does not meet the theme of this article.

Just talking about the film industry, especially the film industry in the special effects field, China can be said to be 0.

Not to belittle this country, it's just a fact I've learned.

There may be several companies engaged in the field of special effects, but they are far from the broad and comprehensive national industrial chain.

The topic is not mentioned yet, let’s talk about Howllywood.

Howllywood flourished in the special effects field in the 1980s. Let’s take a look at what the special effects field has brought to Europe and the United States over the years.

First, the original painting industry was created, which led to millions of employment in Europe and the United States. The film and television art colleges of various universities have added original painting majors, which has improved the diverse and selectiveness of educational reemployment.

Then, many software related to special effects were created, and monopolized the global market, collecting tens of billions of dollars in annual software fees each year.

Then, the rise of professions such as special effects designers, special effects renderers, model designers, etc. also created millions of jobs in Europe and the United States.

Finally, high-end computers are needed to make special effects, which consist of various parts. As a result, the prosperity of the special effects field in Haolywood has driven the healthy and vigorous development of European and American computer equipment and major parts factories, and also increased the employment rate of related industries.

Okay, after hearing what I said, do many friends think that the impact of just one special effects field will be so grand?

I want to say: Yes, it’s so grand. Just dig deep into the development history of Hollywood.

Then, we return to the topic of the Chinese movie "Sky".

I just said that China has no special effects field and its complete industrial chain.

So, can the movie "Sky" allow the Chinese market to rejuvenate this blank field belonging to China like the original Hollywood, and thus produce strong economic and employment vitality with the huge population foundation of China?

As far as I know, since the movie "Sky" was released in China, the country's national media and even state institutions have begun to support the movie without any effort, and it has been highly praised by their national officials until now.

If this movie doesn't make much sense, why should the official agency of the country fully support it?

The more unreasonable things are, there will inevitably be huge goals hidden.

So my answer is: It should be! This movie in China will bring earth-shaking changes to their country's related industrial upgrading. Perhaps we will see this result in international news in a few years.

Speaking of this, let’s talk about the more popular "Avatar" nowadays.

We all know that "Avatar" is an epoch-making 3D movie.

We know more about the fact that something linked to computer technology and manufacturing needs astronomical investment to research and develop it.

Whether it is a 3D chip that supports 3D cameras, 3D equipment in post-production and production software that complies with 3D design, the research and development and investment are definitely not a small amount.

Since capitalists invest in this thing, of course they have to make a lot of money back, otherwise why invest in it?

So, can we make a profit by relying solely on the box office of "Avatar"? It is naturally impossible.

The purpose of the movie "Avatar" is very obvious, which is to advertise 3D equipment and affiliated products. The capitalists behind it want to make a big profit by selling 3D equipment and attract global capital to continue to invest in everything related to 3D technology to improve the financial market belonging to this industrial chain.

However, the emergence of the "Sky" of China is a variable.

Why?

Anyone who is accused of the Internet can analyze that the relevant industries and markets in China will change, upgrade and develop due to this movie.

Whether it is change or upgrade, you have to invest capital. How can you change and upgrade without money?

So, the question here is, will those capitals that prefer the film industry around the world invest in China because of "Sky" more optimistic about the potential of the development of the Chinese market, or will they invest in China more optimistic about the development potential of Haolywood 3D technology?

There is no need to worry too much about this issue. We just need to know that not every capital is a person who spends endless cash. For commercial investments in both China and Hollywood, we can often only choose one of them.

Therefore, as long as there is capital to favor the Chinese market to invest, it is equivalent to depriving the influence of film and television culture brought by Holywood 3D technology in disguise, and reducing the upper limit of the development and investment of 3D technology.

Do you understand why "Sky" has been released yet, and there are a lot of bad reviews that have overwhelmed the movie?

Based on the above, my summary is: "Sky" and "Avatar" were released in the same period. From the beginning, it was not a simple film competition, but a fight in their respective market potential and commercial areas, and a game between countries.

In layman's terms, it was China who used this movie to challenge the blockade and monopoly of the entire Western cultural industry with its own strength!

What I want to say is that "Sky" was born at the wrong time and appeared in the Western cultural market that it could never defeat, and was destined to be unable to compare with the influence of "Avatar".

What I want to say is that "Sky" appears at the right time in China. Because of the contour of "Avatar" and the counter-effects of various negative public opinion, it is seen and appreciated by more people.

Moreover, more businessmen in the capital market have seen the huge potential for China-related industries to revitalize. This is also the second reversal in history after the Chinese and Western culture exports to the strong and weak West. This is the second reversal in history after last year's Beijing Olympics, and this is the first reversal in China's film culture.

In this regard, even though "Sky" is not as good as "Avatar" in terms of box office and influence, and the two movies are still being released, I dare to decide the result. It can be said that "Sky" has won in this competition between Chinese and Western cultures!]

This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content behind! "Damn it!! Is there any increase in knowledge?" - Heilongjiang netizen.

"6666, it really refreshed my view of the cultural industry. It turns out that games and movies have such a great influence!" - Jilin netizen.

"I know that this blogger is an international current affairs commentary expert in Germany and is very famous in Europe and the United States!" - Sheng Hai netizen.
To be continued...