As a point-based game, PUBG will naturally have points that affect the situation of the game. It can not only make the game more intense and more enjoyable, but also make the game conservative and rational. For example, in the final game of the PGL Invitational, the points temporarily ranked first. After understanding its own advantages, Ghost chose to stay in the game's style of playing, and if you want to hit the first, Grubie chose to kill the whole game, from the beginning to the chicken-eating, it is still one head point different from Ghost at the top.

From the perspective of professional teams, is ghost's playing style wrong? No, if a professional team wants to win the championship, they will inevitably choose the optimal solution to execute. This is the case with ghost and grubie. Is ghost playing well?

Definitely no, ghost's advantages are accumulated by a little bit of operation, which also includes the means of letting opponents not get kill points. Point-based games should not only look at whether the guns are fierce in the game, but must rely on various methods to accumulate points to expand their advantages.

The organizer wants to improve the viewing of the game, which is worthy of the audience's praise, but this should not be the way. Since he has enjoyed the benefits of the team's score-grabbing style stimulated by the points system, he must tolerate some of the disadvantages brought by the points system.

Although Sun Yaosheng believes that seeing the situation clearly and making the optimal solution will not reduce the viewing, through the examples of the above two games and pgl, I still feel that there is a balance between the viewing of the game and the operations performed by the players who do not give away heads. The organizer can try to master how to adjust this balance point, which should give professional players more freedom.

What Sun Yaosheng hopes to see is a game that is not only limited to the game, but a game with many tactics. Players rely on their brains and technology to play games, and a game where flowers bloom.

"This organizer is not cautious in doing things, and this score is not deducted casually. No contestant will go to a negative competition. If they dare to play negatively, they will face the boss' accusations when they go back, rather than the organizer's voluntarily deducting points. So I think this score should not be deducted." Sun Yaosheng shook his head and said his point.

This competition is actually not very authoritative, and Sun Yaosheng has never paid attention to it.

But as soon as this news appeared, the problem immediately came. Sun Yaosheng took his phone and took a look at the points ranking. Their Chinese team is ranked second, and many others are teams that he has never heard of.

This iu team was deducted 30 points for its own thunder. Although from the ranking, these 30 points do not affect iu's identity as second place, the official deduction of points made many viewers and netizens feel very confused and even angry.

There are also many viewers watching the game. In this game, we can see that at that time, only Cangyu and the full skc were left in the final circle, and the four skcs were in the safe zone. Both the number of people and the terrain of IU were at an absolute disadvantage. It was impossible to kill the four skc players in this situation!

So when Cangyu of IU discovered the skc team members, he chose to use his own thunder in place and not give his head to skc. This is not an excessive move.

But it is precisely such a tactic that everyone thinks is normal, but iu was punished by the official passive competition after the game.

Many netizens said that they could not accept such punishment. Sun Yaosheng himself, as a player, could not accept such punishment.

Whether from the perspective of the audience, the fans, the players or the players, Sun Yaosheng feels that there is no problem with him in this place.

On the premise of determining the situation on the field, I made the most favorable decision for myself, confirming that he was the only one left on the other side, and then, if I had no chance to go further, I would not give the other party points.

Every step is a choice that is beneficial to oneself. If this is considered negative, there is no positive team except the chicken-eating team. It can only be said that the people who make rules NC!

If you accidentally thunder, you are crushed to death by your teammates, and you will jump off the building and fall to death?

How do you judge whether these are intentional, intentional or intentional? What are the criteria for judging negative competitions and accidental care? Do you lose points no matter what if you commit suicide in the finals?

If you regard not giving points as a negative competition, then being struck by someone and poisoned to death outside the circle is a negative competition? Be struck by someone and being struck by someone and being suffocated to death is a negative competition? Is it a negative competition? Does it violate the concept of survival in this game? Is it a negative competition?

If a teammate is injured in a car accident, he will kill his teammate if he cannot be saved. Is it a negative game?

So if you assume a situation where you know that you don’t have a chance to enter the circle, I can’t give your opponent 15 points, maybe your opponent is just 15 points away from me to win the championship. At present, our team is the first, what should I do? The opponent is still sweeping me. Can’t I do it? This is a tactical arrangement. The game is scored points, not the number of chickens. Since you score points, you should have your own tactics. Then the teams that were packed into the early poisons are all negative competitions?

Since the game thunder can kill itself, why can't the game be used? Of course, this can be used in points tactics.

So if the team chooses tactics to sail, and as a result, they will be deducted points if they die in poison? Anyone who enters the circle late and is finally poisoned will be deducted points?

Shouldn’t the rules be formulated before the competition?

If this rule is not formulated before the game, why do you use this rule to deduct points? Do you deduct any points if you want? If the game feels that this is not good, shouldn't this rule be formulated and declare that it will take effect in the next game?

So Sun Yaosheng was inexplicably watching this news. No matter how he said that the organizer of North America was not a new manufacturer, how could he make such a wrong judgment directly arouse public anger and even lead to many viewers giving up watching this game directly.

The audience is the source of the competition. If there is no competition that the audience watches, what's the point? There is nothing at all!

"The explanation of the competition is also very strange. Without the spirit of e-sports, what is e-sports spirit? Do they understand?" Zhu Xiaofei said mockingly, "E-sports spirit is to win and win the first place! Their approach is to avoid giving points to the opponent. He clearly knows that he has no way to 1v4, so is it called e-sports spirit?"

"The bullshit e-sports spirit, this is a 15-point bonus. This is a tactic. It is necessary to give points to be considered competitive spirit? The organizer has a problem with his mind, and he will deduct points without any explanation. Someone was knocked down and electrocuted into the drug before, so he would also deduct points? Or are they specifically targeting us Chinese players?" Zong Kai said unhappily.
Chapter completed!