I saw many readers asking about the group number of book friends. I only mentioned it once before in Qidian Writers. Now I will mention it again in a single chapter. The QQ group number is 850785216.
And this single chapter is not just for posting group accounts, I want to use this single chapter to say something.
Now this book is doing well, and a lot of people are reading it. The reader base is much larger than before, so some problems will arise.
The following can be viewed with pleasure.
On October 5th, a reader from the bookstore joined the book club and chatted privately with me asking some questions, both about the book and about myself.
I have answered all the questions about the book. I have said some of what I can say about myself. The rest, I tell this reader, don’t be so curious about my privacy. It is best to discuss the book in the group.
Let’s chat, no need to chat with me privately.
Then I went to the group and took a look, and sure enough, this reader was chatting with the group friends.
In fact, up to this point, except for the tone of the other party as if I were being checked by a leader, unnecessary curiosity about my personal situation, and innocuous questions like "What do you think when a reader says you are gay?", there is nothing.
Something particularly bad. Then I scrolled up the group records and found that the first sentence this reader said when he joined the group was "Is the author still alive?"
Then, "Isn't it possible that the corpse has turned into a corpse?" "The obsession before death is to finish writing the second book before leaving." "The author dare not come out at night and stay silently in the coffin." Maybe you think it is humorous to say this?
But the book friends in the book club didn't think this was funny. Next, the reader commented on the book a few times in the tone of a leader's speech, some good and some bad. I accept this.
Afterwards, he asked me when I would give up this book, and wondered if I could make ends meet with my part-time job, and when I would become a eunuch.
I am speechless about this way of chatting, and I really hope I will give up? Before this, this reader's way of speaking has made many group members feel uncomfortable.
I have omitted some topics that are not easy to write about here, and I will only write the key points.
It is a good thing to give opinions, but the premise is that the opinions are based on the existing basis. The following is an excerpt of the original words.
"1. How does the author connect the two plots? 2. What roles will they play? What is the emotional line between them? These are the two main aspects that need to be analyzed. Of course, if he forcibly hits a stone to cause amnesia, then it should be regarded as
I didn’t say it. The author wouldn’t be so cheating."
The question is very good. It is not directed at this reader. I just want to let everyone take a look at the question through these words - the question is directed at the book (very good), and the process is made up by the reader (okay). It's a scam.
The conclusion is (confusing) to the author.
This is not an isolated case. Many readers have taken the plot they guessed as the plot I have written, and then drawn a confusing conclusion.
The following is this reader's question about Yu Xing. The root of the problem is, "Yu Xing's unarmed combat ability is SSS, and his weapon combat ability is A. Why do he still have to use a weapon?"
A group of friends asked him, when did the author write that Yu Xing was stronger with bare hands than with weapons?
He used the example of Qu Nianqing to prove it. I also quoted the original words and added the additions in parentheses.
"Yu Xing was able to catch Qu with his bare hands under conditions with a big difference in level (this refers to the little practice Yu Xing and Qu Nianqing had before setting off for Fuhua City), right? It should be easy to beat two red-clothed people with Qu, right?"
Group friends said that his views were wrong. His actual words were: "No, no, no, views must be based on facts. I have already made the facts very clear. References are the basis."
What he means is that Qu Xianqing can't beat Yu Xing with his bare hands + it's easy for Qu Xianqing to beat two red clothes = it's easy for Yu Xing to beat two red clothes with his bare hands, so Yu Xing's unarmed combat power is SSS, his combat power with weapons is A, and he has eagerness
The idea of looking for weapons is contradictory.
Me: ???Good guy, at first glance it can really scare people.
But you don’t need to look too closely to find out what the connection is between Yu Xing’s strength in fighting and his weakness in weapons!
First of all, it is true that Yu Xing is better than Qu Xianqing in fighting (this is what I clearly wrote).
The second point is that it is very simple for Qu Xianqing to fight against the red clothes. That's right, it is very simple. The prerequisite is to hold a sword or use a sacrifice.
Third, when Yu Xing and Qu Xianqing were practicing, it was pure fighting. Qu Xianqing did not hold a sword or use any sacrifices.
As a differentiated boss, her sacrifice reserves and swords are the source of her combat power.
Yu Xing's fighting ability is strong, but why does it mean that he is weaker with weapons than with bare hands? Where does this conclusion come from?
When fighting Yu Xing, Qu Xianqing didn't hold a sword!
Very simple logic, with bare hands, Yu Xing's combat power is 5, Qu Xianqing is 4, using weapons and sacrifices, Yu Xing's combat power is 8, Qu Xianqing's combat power is 14 (these are not exact values, just an example), Qu Xianqing cannot beat him with his bare hands.
Yu Xing, it doesn't mean that Yu Xing's combat effectiveness with weapons is lower than with bare hands.
I happened to open the group at that time, and I told the reader: "This conclusion is flawed."
Him: "Did you see what I said?"
Group friends: "??"
Me: "???You typed so many words, weren't you the one who typed it yourself?"
Him: "Did you see what I typed?"
Well, he probably does think he's funny.
Anyway, I think he was really thinking about this issue, so I explained to him many times that why Qu Xianqing couldn't beat Yu Xing with his bare hands didn't mean that Yu Xing was weaker with weapons than with his bare hands.
He didn't listen, so I gave him an example that was easier to understand.
"A shooter in the game is very strong when he has a gun. If he loses his gun and fights with others in close combat, it does not mean that he is not a strong shooter. Similarly, the person who defeats the shooter without a gun will be
Is he a mage? Doesn't it mean that he is weaker when he picks up a staff than when fighting with bare hands?"
I think I have been very patient, and the group members are also listening and discussing. Then this reader said:
"Are you sure the game is logical?"
"It comes from life, it can be higher than it, but it cannot be separated from your perceptual experience."
I am really upset that this reader used his own logic to convince himself, making a very simple question so complicated, and then in turn used this logic to ask me.
Isn’t what I write about supernatural? Is ghosts logical? Are sacrifices logical? Can I have personal emotional experience???
…
Again, it’s okay to give opinions, but please don’t overturn my settings and use another set of settings in your mind to ask me how to write. Then just give me the keyboard, and whoever wants to set the settings will write the text.
ah.
Readers read the article and the author writes the article. I think at least the relationship between the two is equal.
Writing is my job, and I work seriously. I don’t need to be like a dog, so I have to change my settings when someone says something, or I have to apologize to anyone who scolds me.
One of the managers in the group couldn't stand it anymore and kicked the person out, and the follow-up was the usual routine - the person added him back to the group, said that the group members were all elementary school students, said that my attitude was extremely bad, and then said that he didn't want to be around anymore and kicked him.
I wonder why you came back if you don't want to stay anymore? Just to scold me for a few words. My other readers are all primary school students? I am a welcome guest, so I can't talk nicely. I have to kowtow to you to be considered a good attitude?
The management did as he wished and kicked me out again. My book friend told me to take a screenshot of what happened today and keep a screenshot of the evidence, including all the inappropriate remarks made by the other party at the beginning, so as to prevent the other party from causing trouble in the comment area.
I was typing words at night, so I opened the backend comments and took a look. OK, sure enough, something happened. I wrote several one-star negative reviews in the bookstore, and continued to criticize my readers, as if everyone else was bullying me.
In fact, the negative reviews on my main website and bookstore have no impact on me, but I just can't bear to think that others are wrong and blame my other readers' behavior, so I held my breath and wrote such a long single chapter.
Good guy, it’s equal to my usual word count for one chapter.
This matter has little to do with other readers who are reading the book. If you see this, you will be shocked.
I have not deleted his one-star review, but he is currently speaking manically. I have posted a screenshot, and you are welcome to take a look.