What I wrote yesterday was very taxing on my brain. I didn’t sleep well. I need to write something before catching up on my sleep.
A month or two ago, there was an interview in which a question was raised, which went something like this:
When I was studying in Luyuan, I wrote something. After reading it, a teacher asked: Why are the authors of your online articles so convoluted? After self-examination, I found that I am used to emphasizing when writing, while traditional literature seeks to emphasize the emphasis.
It’s just right, click it as far as it will go, because it’s beautiful.
It’s not that I can’t understand traditional literature, but fortunately I can still understand it, so I can clearly see the reasons for this difference: audience reasons. Readers who have truly received elite education or systematic education have many basic logics already formed in their hearts.
As a simple example, we talk about the concept of "group silence". Where does this concept come from and what are its consequences? In the minds of readers who have truly received systematic education, it only takes four words to take shape.
According to the principle of output, regarding the worries and seriousness of "group silence", perhaps this person's knowledge system has been fed back to him in an instant.
But most people in this society have not formed such a mechanism - I mean more than 90% of the people in this society, even those who have gone to college or even received a higher diploma, probably have not formed such a mechanism.
mechanism, then, in order to convey it thoroughly and accurately, I have to explain the ins and outs of "group silence" in detail. In this way, people will not only see a seemingly cool term, but actually understand it.
its meaning.
It is also like a complex and profound famous book full of social metaphors, such as "Water Margin". Only those with a perfect logical system can see the irony and revelations contained in it. But most people will only see "See on the Road"
Shout out if it’s not right!” “Brotherly loyalty” “Eat big chunks of meat, big bowls of wine, and kill people happily!”
Enlightenment articles must be clear about their direction. This is something I understood after reading these things clearly. Among the readers I face, there are many who are powerful and profound. However, based on the culture and education of the current society,
There are countless people whose systems and personal thinking systems have flaws and one-sided problems.
This issue is very complex. For example, to truly understand "Water Margin" at a literary or philosophical level requires a complete set of cultural training. In ancient times, this training existed and was directional. It no longer exists in modern times because of the collapse of culture.
The chain of cultural collapse has resulted in the country not being clear about what it needs to create. If the country cannot be clear, education cannot have goals. When education has no goals, the education system can only put all the potentially useful things in front of you. So.
Even if it is a "Water Margin", even if you have experienced higher education, you will have various thoughts after reading it. We don't know what kind of educational direction is "right" based on modern times, and we don't dare to draw conclusions easily.
, but without any direction, it must be "wrong". Some people will say that this is freedom, this is diversity, but it is not. Why not, I am not going to explain it here.
I seem to have explained a lot of things in the book, such as "Heaven and Earth are unkind", which was a concept that was both deep and shallow in ancient times. It is deep because everyone avoids it, but it is shallow because after receiving professional training, it is not difficult to understand it correctly.
. But after you understand, you will find that you don’t need to explain to ****, it will be more troublesome for them to understand. In ancient times, it was right to make people weak and ignorant.
Modern times are different.
Since the emergence of human rights, democracy has been a big concept and trend. Many fool elites say it is better than anything else. In fact, democracy is the way of a gentleman in ancient times. When you understand logic, have discernment, are not selfish, and can be independent, then
This is true democracy. If the people want to be independent, they must develop the wisdom of the people. What are the requirements of the wisdom of the people? Human society is like a ship sailing in a sea full of rocks. There is no map. In the past, some of the best people were at the helm.
, walking cautiously, one mistake, and millions of people died. From now on, let everyone take the helm, and the requirements will be determined by your own imagination. If China is like this now, what do you think of the country?
Things should be decided by the votes of the people around you. I would rather immigrate. It is not safe to immigrate to the United States. At least I have to go to Mars.
However, when human rights become more and more important and people are valued more and more, it is really possible for you to vote. It will deceive you symbolically at the beginning, but in the future, you may really be able to decide something.
Enlightening people’s wisdom was mentioned during the May 4th Movement. Later, no one said it, and no one did it. There are objective reasons for this. In the past thirty years of reform and opening up, everything has been shaken. The original purpose of its existence was to hold back the cultural system of spiritual civilization.
It didn't have any effect because it was destroyed long ago.
When discussing literature in Luyuan, the teacher said: "There are many people around me who have been persevering." Persistence is very valuable, but in the final analysis, the culture since ancient times has been an elite culture, and elite culture requires people to worship. For example
University, we say that university education has no direction, but knowledge is always there. If you are a person with a certain degree of self-awareness, you can definitely learn something profound. On the contrary, if you are not self-aware, you will gain nothing. It makes a huge difference.
Where does self-consciousness come from?
After thirty years of perseverance, when there is no real meaning, has anyone tried to kneel down? Tried to guide them with all their heart? After all, the basic foundation of literacy has finally been laid.
My readers, or readers of online articles, are all from the bottom of society - please understand that when I say this bottom, I am not being dismissive, because I am the same - I have read a book, but there is no reason to go further and work after leaving the society.
, moving bricks, working as a civil servant from 9 to 5, getting married and watching "The Legend of Zhen Huan", the people above said this is very superficial. From a spiritual level, this is indeed some low-level spiritual realm. However, is it to blame these people?
?
This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content! If you want to raise the social level and pursuit in a society full of desires and capital, be realistic and do it pragmatically. Oh,
If you say "I persisted" above, do you really do your best? Is it enough to just stand on the sidelines and then criticize and abuse, and feel that you are superior?
There was this conversation during the interview.
Question: "So for you, YY and Shuang are a way to build people up? Is it a way to educate and entertain?"
"Well, it is an extremely necessary means. At this stage, it is no less important than the pursuit of elegant art, and may even be more important."
“Efficiently killing time for readers?”
"No, it's about exporting values efficiently."
When our readers' hearts are 100% filled with desires, it is meaningless for us to talk about 100% spiritual pursuits. Only by meeting 90% of desires and talking about 10% of pursuits can we effectively send people away.
To a better place. I will take you one way, and let others take the next step.
What I am dealing with are readers who have the basic attributes of reality. There are many friends who are willing to discuss these things and will be inspired by these things, and then they will become less extreme - this is actually the path I have taken. Here
I have been immersed in long paragraphs of discussion before, such as at the end of the fifth episode and in many places. Some readers, who have a certain degree of literary accomplishment, saw this and suggested that you actually destroyed the aesthetic requirements of traditional literature and even destroyed the work.
Holistic, in fact, I have said it time and time again a long time ago, this is the balance I choose.
Why can't I understand: In fact, I know very well that these lengths destroy the integrity of the work?
Even if the integrity of the work is destroyed, I still want to highlight them. Another reason is that this crude method of destroying the integrity of the work can highlight them more clearly.
I wrote a very story-telling book, which could even be literary in nature. After I attracted people, I roughly gave them private goods, but it was also the result of hundreds of thousands of thoughts. I used to
I said, if you don’t like it, you can jump, if you can’t stand it, you can tolerate it, and if you can’t stand it, just abandon the article. I actually said it more than once.
After every long statement, someone comes out to publish an article stating some basic concepts of literature. I can understand the meaning of this, but I don’t like these things. In the final analysis, "The Son-in-law" is a novel from my point of view.
This is an experimental article. It is to test something that high-level literature cannot do. We try to kneel down and see if we can get people to step on it. Since it is an experimental article, it cannot be conclusive. I have repeatedly deduced it countless times. The basic concepts of literature
, is the starting point of this deduction. What you think you want to teach me, I have already broken it down and read it carefully countless times, but if you mention it, it will still waste my energy and time.
It's like after we have determined our basic attitude towards doing things and started work in the most rigorous manner, someone keeps jumping out and saying, "How are you sure you are right?" That is a waste of time.
I hope that after this article, no one will talk to me about the foundation of traditional literature. After writing it, we can judge its merits and demerits.
…
One more thing, I have never thought about reaching the high point of traditional literature. I admire traditional literature because the expression of anything in traditional literature has been studied to the extreme. I am afraid that the Internet literature with economic support will be like
Just like the invasion of the Eight-Power Allied Forces, traditional literature suffered a complete defeat and all these good techniques were lost.
However, the literature of the future cannot be lofty. It is not a divine object hanging on the top of a tower for people to worship. It should be a ladder in itself for human society to step on and go to the top of the tower to see the scenery.
The essence of human beings creating culture is to explore and improve their own spiritual realm. Any culture that does not aim to improve human society, whether it exists or not, is indifferent.
My mind is racing and I have written too much - originally these were things to be written in the postscript. Well, I'm going to catch up on some sleep. By the way, in the last half day, I'll just ask for votes for a single chapter, okay ^_^