After being refuted to the point, the overseas expert's face turned red, and he hurriedly defended himself and emphasized: "these are two points." These are two points of view. What they actually want to express is the latter point, and the question is not noble.
The concept of medical service to patients is not met by colleagues' technical skills. Asking colleagues on site to stop is to say: If you can't do it,
Now all this action is done on the spot to fool the uninitiated.
If you can't do it, you won't wait and see the situation before saying, why are you anxious? What makes people anxious is that the other party is actually going to take action when they can't even imagine what is going on. How can people not feel a little anxious? This
I'm afraid that by refreshing their new understanding of technology, they will infringe on their original technical domain.
Priority status.
After understanding the other party's mentality, Dr. Tong and the others stopped arguing with the other party and directly answered: "No points!"
Just watch it and then talk about it after you finish it. There is no need to randomly raise opinions. We don’t have any opinions yet.
Whether it's a mule or a horse coming out for a walk, no one has to worry about it, the facts will prevail.
Dr. Tong was very cool when he was supposed to be cool. He didn't talk too much nonsense with foreigners, no matter whether he was a great person or not. The musicians at the scene were not as active as their foreign counterparts. They all gathered around the doctor and asked how to help their sick colleagues.
The concept of ordinary people is very simple, only the word kindness. If you don’t understand professional skills, you only need to think about medicine.
When students say they can help, they should do so quickly.
"What are you going to do?" everyone asked. Xie Xie, a classmate at the scene, arranged the work for the musicians who were eager to help: "The specific method is what our doctors have planned. We have selected a few pieces of music in advance. These
We think the song may be harmful to the patient’s brain swelling
The nerve cells near the tumor are affected. When the patient plays, we can take the opportunity to further observe and study the maximum range of the tumor-affected area in her brain." This is how the brain participates in music. It is not just about listening to Doremy.
, can analyze the notes, timbre, melody and rhythm of the music, etc. The brain of a musician is undoubtedly more refined in the analysis of music than the brain of ordinary people.
Different music, different note timbres, melody rhythms and other combinations may stimulate the human brain to respond differently, and the performance will be more significant in musicians. When it comes to the patient, after the patient receives specific music signal input
, may produce different physiological and pathological reactions in the brain, and then input wrong signals to the body and manifest themselves. Doctors can make further adjustments based on these.
The ward where the patient's brain is diseased is carefully outlined. It sounds quite magical. The musicians can't quite understand it but they are very excited. It is not too fun for laymen to watch and join in the fun. In sharp contrast, overseas colleagues began to chirp again.
Wow, I almost scolded you across the line
With those two words: "Go crazy!" How can the human brain be so simple? The entire brain circuit network is extremely complex. For this reason, doctors usually can only use awake surgery to stimulate directly with electrodes. Music stimulation is used to do this.
Presumably, maybe in some hands
A similar approach will be used during surgery.
The difference is that doctors can directly observe brain activity during the operation, and then conduct comprehensive analysis using stimulation methods such as electrodes. Simply using music stimulation to make deductions before surgery? I have never heard of it. If you insist on pushing, at least add magnetic resonance.
and CT allow doctors to observe real-time brain activity as evidence.
