Chapter 127 European and American styles are very different
Seeing Ronaldo excitedly asking the referee to argue, Deng Kai immediately stepped forward and stopped Ronaldo.
In fact, Ronaldo's fall in the penalty area can be awarded a penalty kick.
But again, if you want to say that it is not a big problem to award a flop, the probability of both is equal.
Because Ronaldo is in a state of "passive confrontation".
This is also the biggest difference between football and basketball.
Every once in a while, some epoch-making players appear in the NBA.
Four major centers.
Jordan.
Four major points.
James.
After them, two players changed basketball.
One is Curry.
He brought basketball into the three-point era.
One is Harden.
He brought basketball into the porcelain era.
Before Harden, fouls in basketball and football were actually the same, that is, head-on confrontation.
Those who cause others to commit fouls will also have to bear a certain cost of confrontation.
In that era, drawing fouls was a double-edged sword. It was one of the ways to prove a hero and had a high gold content. But until the end, few stars would choose to use this self-harming style of play.
But the King of Ten Thousand Porcelain style of play pioneered by Harden, with all kinds of proactive collisions, has made fouling a derogatory term.
This style of play seems to comply with the rules, and even takes advantage of the rules.
At one time, people were afraid to come within one meter of him.
Those shooting movements that are not shooting at all have repeatedly won him free throw opportunities and created space for holding the ball.
This style of play is essentially anti-basketball.
It overdrafts fans’ passion and love for the sport of basketball.
This is also a super booster for basketball, which was originally highly competitive, to enter the "glass basketball" era.
Since then, whenever there is a breakthrough, there must be a foul. This is a change of degree.
In the past, most pitching fouls were only committed by hitters, but now, if you dare to defend against the opponent, you can almost get a foul. This is a change in purpose and nature.
The style of play that seemed obviously problematic was actually in compliance with the rules, so much so that the NBA was unable to think of a way to contain Harden for a while.
Only through the introduction of regulations such as "concerning the invalidation of foul-making actions that tilt towards the defender at an abnormal angle when shooting" has the trend of porcelain gradually changed.
This can't help but make people think about a question, that is, are we playing the rules or playing basketball.
This is actually related to a problem that many people did not understand when they were young... Everyone including the police knows that the other party is a bad person, but why can't they catch the other party and the other party can still get away with it?
This is a classic argument, and it's very difficult to say whether it's right or wrong.
As far as sports are concerned, some things are not written in the rules, not because there are omissions in the rules, but because those things are not in line with the sport. Everyone understands it without mentioning it, but I didn't expect that some people would be so shameless later.
For various reasons, Americans have become metaphysical in this regard and in many aspects, and have made many jokes.
But Europeans have never forgotten the original intention of football.
No one is allowed to take advantage of loopholes in the rules to benefit from them.
Therefore, for many football fouls, some are penalized and some are not, excluding the influence of black whistle match-fixing. The reason lies in the referee's judgment of the motivations of both parties.
According to the American view, when entering the penalty area, there is contact between the legs of the opponent and the ball holder, and the ball holder falls, it is an absolute penalty kick.
Even if the ball carrier intentionally hooks the defender's foot with his own foot, it is a penalty kick.
But in Europe and in football, the referee believes that the ball carrier did not completely control the football after entering the penalty area. At this time, the scale of the confrontation between the two sides will be much larger than the scale of the confrontation between the other side after you have the ball.
If you fall down easily at this time, it is due to your own lack of resistance.
Or you entered the penalty area without any offensive intention, or you took the initiative to fall to the ground within the normal range of confrontation, etc.
None of these will result in penalty kicks.
Therefore, what Ronaldo just did in the penalty area was a "penalty kick under American ideology" and a "dive under European ideology."
He didn't deserve this yellow card unjustly.
Many people debate which of these two attitudes towards rules is better and which is worse.
These two kinds of confrontation actually exist in every country and in every field.
"Absolutely follow the rules" seems fair at first glance and very deceptive.
But in fact, if you study carefully, you will find that it is too idealistic, too easy to be exploited, and it is just a pie painted by capitalists.
If normal people can exploit any loophole in the rules, then capitalists can exploit it. But normal people can only exploit it once in a certain period of time, while capitalists can exploit it countless times in a certain period of time through employment, copying, etc.
Who do you think has the most profit?
This seemingly fair situation immediately turned into an absolute unfairness.
Therefore, for any public social platform, as time goes by and the influx of capital-based troll accounts, the voice of real users will be almost gone.
This is the absolute crushing of individuals by capital.
"Subjective regulation" seems unfair and full of trust crises.
But just by being able to block the interference of capital to a certain extent and allowing individuals to compete with individuals, this has already given ordinary people great opportunities.
Even if the subjective regulator is corrupted by capital and commits fraud, in large-scale data, this is still a small probability event.
It is far better than 10,000 times that capital can openly crush ordinary people by changing the rules.
This is why there are many impressive black whistle games in European football, and there seem to be fewer black whistle games in American basketball. But in fact, everyone knows that the intensity of the NBA's control of the game is far better than that of the five major leagues.
So many people like to watch basketball when they are young, and they like to watch football when they are older.
…
During halftime, Violante was brainstorming with the coaching staff.
They tried to plan better ground coordination and penetrate Poland.
But Deng Kai thinks this is not feasible.
The Polish copper and iron walls are really strong, and ground penetration is extremely difficult.
What's more...the Portuguese actually have a better way.
"Actually...Almeida's header ability is very strong." Deng Kai expressed his opinion from the side.
The coaches looked at Deng Kai with some confusion, as if they were saying, you shouldn't be here, you should be under the car.
You're just a player and this is a discussion for coaches.
However, head coach Violante remained silent. Instead, he looked at Deng Kai, meaning to let him speak.
Deng Kai continued: "There were several times in the first half that Almeida fought for the top. Although the quality of the goal is not high, as long as the ball can be touched, the quality is just a matter of angle adjustment and luck."
"Almeida is very tall. Even if he can't jump, he can definitely reach the top of the football."
"Cristiano Ronaldo has good bounce and his header ability is also very good."
"If the two of them can always compete for the same point, it will be difficult for the other party to defend. If you can target one, it will be difficult to target two at the same time!"
"And in our team, there are more than one or two players who are good at crossing."