Some book friends said that the combat power has collapsed, but there is no such thing.
Because this is a system text, I didn’t mention some default bugs. I thought everyone knew about it, but it turned out that there were some book friends who didn’t understand.
For a normal person, his strength fluctuates with his state.
When he has a cold or diarrhea, he is definitely a little weaker than normal.
For example, King Ma, after he is infected, it is not certain whether he can beat a strong adult man.
But the protagonist is different.
The properties of the system panel are fixed.
In other words, in theory, the protagonist is at the peak of his strength at all times.
This is where the problem arises.
If the battle lasts for a long time, will the protagonist's strength decrease as his physical strength is exhausted?
After the protagonist is injured, will his strength decrease?
After the decline, will the system's attributes still count?
After many systematic writers have practiced it many times, they have come to a conclusion.
It means that the protagonist's strength will not decrease, otherwise it will be very toxic and unpleasant.
In other words, it defaults to a plug-in with unlimited physical strength.
This way there will be no logic bugs.
For example, when you are playing horseback and slashing, if you don't lose health, you can ride a horse and sneak away a large group of soldiers, and then kill them one by one. This is the principle.
Being injured means that a minor injury locks health by default.
As for serious injuries, under normal circumstances, the protagonist is unlikely to be seriously injured.
Because he is the protagonist, Bigger is here.
But if the plot requires it and the protagonist is seriously injured, then the attributes of the panel will be ignored.
Infinite physical strength and limited health due to minor injuries. Under these two conditions, the protagonist is a humanoid robot powered by a nuclear reactor.
A normal person would be exhausted after killing a few people, but the protagonist can keep killing them.
What's more, the opponents are all ordinary soldiers. If there are no masters, they will naturally hit one by one.
Moreover, the fact that three hundred people were beaten down did not mean that three hundred people died, but two hundred were seriously injured. Because the weather in the River Land was hot and hot, no doctor could save them.
When the Wolf family's army in the north went south, the long summer was over and it was almost autumn. The time in the book was still two or three months away from this point, and the temperatures were incomparable.
What's more, in Quanyou's world, there is a serious shortage of doctors, and bachelors from various castles also serve as doctors.
The level of poisoning is high, and most of the cures are done with poppy milk.
There's no way to save it, it can't be cured, just drink flower milk and wait to die!
And there is another question, whether the Sword of Dawn is strong or not, but it is a knight who uses a sword.
The soldiers of Westeros, who are called men in iron clothes by the horse king, are all soldiers in full iron armor.
In the series, there are many mistakes in armor. Robb, the King in the North, doesn't even have shin armor or iron boots. Is it possible?
Swords and armor-piercing effects are far inferior to hammers.
In the wrong spring of 281, at the tournament at Harrenhal, Prince Rhaegar defeated the fearless Gossip Stan and became the number one.
But two years later, he was hammered to death by Robert Baratheon with a sledgehammer on the Ruby Ford.
Why?
On the battlefield, the one who can break armor is the God of War.
As for bows and arrows, their armor-breaking effect is not very good.
As for crossbows, I have only seen the joystick type crossbows that Joffrey played, but I have never seen them deployed in large-scale armies.
Bed crossbows and other things only appear when shooting dragons in the later stage, and they don't seem to be used in the early stage.
After all, in the manual era, large crossbow arrows were expensive, and it was not cost-effective to kill several people with one arrow.
It's better to just let the soldiers go up and attack the enemy.
What are the advantages of low human rights?
So I feel that the combat power has not collapsed. If there is any doubt, let you take the lead.
