From university lecturer to chief academician Chapter 238: Seeing nothing is called professional! The paper is officially published and is hotly debated internationally!
Chapter 238: Seeing nothing is called professional! The paper is officially published and is hotly debated internationally!
Mason Mathematical Sciences Laboratory.
Second floor.
In the large workshop next to the central laboratory, a group of people gathered at Bill Carr's desk, staring closely at the mathematical work he had completed on the manuscript paper.
The black ink pen writes lines of clear characters, which makes people feel immersed in it. Through the connotation displayed by the characters, it seems that they can see the huge changes in the future technological era.
Everyone concentrated, everyone held their breath, and everyone suppressed their excitement.
There were two streaks of black and blue hanging from the corner of Birkar's eyes. He obviously didn't get enough rest, but he seemed very energetic. He was also very excited and suppressed his excitement to finish the last part of the content.
Comparative judgment.
Detailed calculations.
Substitute numbers, transform, then determine and transform equations.
When he finished writing the last symbol, Bill Carr immediately clenched his fists without even checking it, and everyone else cheered excitedly, "Yeah~~"
"It's done! It's finally done!"
"Kacher, your method of inversely transforming equations using geometry is wonderful!"
"Your graphics splicing logic is also excellent!"
“This is the best research ever!”
"We're done!"
Everyone is very excited, everyone is very excited.
Wang Hao and Birkar hugged each other, and Lin Bohan, Luo Dayong, He Yi, Yan Jing, Zhang Zhiqiang and others who were watching also came over to hug them.
This moment is indeed exciting.
Everyone knows how significant the research done is.
If history has records, they relied on theoretical research at this moment to officially open the "superconducting era" of human science and technology.
After getting excited, Wang Hao asked Zhang Zhiqiang to help organize the internal celebration, and then talked about the thesis issue, "We can start preparing the thesis. We will have a day off today and start writing the thesis tomorrow."
"Our main papers must be completed together, and your respective papers must also be prepared. It is best to publish them together. I will contact academic journals in advance."
"Everyone go back to rest first, recuperate your spirits, and then go out for dinner together in the evening."
"Let's talk about the thesis after we have a good rest!"
During this period, everyone is very busy. They devote themselves to their work. It is very good to sleep for six hours a day.
You can tell just by looking at Birkar's mental state. Everyone else is similar. Even Wang Hao is doing research except sleeping.
Now I can finally breathe a sigh of relief.
Wang Hao returned to his office. He did not take a break immediately. Instead, he wrote an email to Baker Campbell, the head of the physics department of Nature magazine, to make an appointment in advance to publish the content.
The content of the email is as follows--
"My team has made new progress in the follow-up research on the superconducting mechanism. It will probably be submitted next week. Can I publish it in the next issue of the newsletter?"
Wang Hao did not consider the issue of review. He had already submitted two manuscripts before, and published the contents of "Superconducting Laws" and "Yang-Mills Equation Prediction of Particle Collision Experiments".
He is the leader in new fields and the most authoritative figure in the world.
Publishing subsequent research results in the same field naturally does not require review.
In addition, the review process will be very complicated.
If they want to find professionals to review the content of their research, they must verify the conclusions. Even the verification of two elements requires a team of calculations for a long time, and experimental verification is also required.
That would be too complicated.
There is more than eight hours of time difference between China and Eagle Country. Campbell only saw the content of the email sent by Wang Hao when he came to work in the morning.
"New progress in superconducting related research? Wang Hao's team?"
Campbell immediately realized that it was a big study.
I saw Wang Hao talking about catching up with the next issue of content, and the next issue of "Nature" is in a week. Even the next issue of "Nature-Physics" is only two days apart.
Then there will definitely be no review time.
He hesitated for a moment, but decided to agree first, "Dr. Wang Hao, of course your research can be published. I will arrange the layout in advance and wait for submissions at any time."
After sending the email, Campbell was still hesitant. Both of Wang Hao's results were published in the journal Nature. The first was a study related to the "law of superconductivity", which was reviewed in detail.
The second time was the "Particle Collision Experiment Predicted by the Yang-Mills Equation". Because the prediction had already happened, it meant that the research had been confirmed, so the review was naturally different.
This time is different.
Based on the AC gravity experiment, the direction of studying the superconducting mechanism has attracted international attention. Some experimental groups at American have made progress related to the experiment, and some will submit articles to the magazine "Nature".
Wang Hao's research progress will definitely attract attention, but will it also require peer review if the results are produced?
"Nature" magazine must ensure the quality and correctness of papers.
Campbell is certainly not questioning the quality of the submission, but he still feels that professional review is necessary to eliminate extremely unlikely possibilities.
The internal rules of Nature magazine are that “as long as the paper is not sure to be correct, it requires peer review.”
He hesitated.
Campbell picked up the phone and wanted to ask the editor-in-chief Magdalena Skipper. Then he suddenly thought of his colleague Donald Konidy, whom he met at the banquet.
Donald Conidi is the editor-in-chief of Science magazine. Science, like Nature, is a comprehensive magazine and an academic journal. They have always had fierce competition.
If it were Donald Conady, what would he do if faced with this kind of thing?
Campbell simply sent an email to Donald Conady, briefly talking about what he had encountered, and asking for his opinion.
Donald Konidy is the editor-in-chief of Science magazine, and she is also a female editor-in-chief. The directors of Science and Nature are both women, which is probably what the two top academic magazines have in common.
Konidi received Campbell's email and immediately replied, "Reviewing is a necessary process."
"No matter how famous the scholar is, he still has to review the manuscript. Even if he is the winner of an international award, there may be errors in his new research."
Konidi said a few words of his own opinion, and also copied a rule from the magazine "Science" - all research articles need to be peer-reviewed before being published in the journal. If there are uncertain research contents, they can be classified under "Controversy"
Among the ranks of sexual articles.
There are historical reasons for this provision.
Twenty years ago, Science magazine retracted eight papers published by German physicist Hendrick because many of the data in the papers were fabricated by the authors.
Later, a Hanguo biologist, Hwang Woo-suk, published a paper on human stem cell embryo cloning research, which was found to be an obvious falsification by Seoul National University.
During this period, other incidents of fraud were discovered, and Science magazine fell into a whirlpool of public opinion.
Later, an investigation committee established by Science found that although some papers were reviewed according to normal procedures, they were unable to do anything about deliberate fraud.
Therefore, the investigation committee recommended that the manuscripts received should be classified into non-controversial and controversial articles, so that controversial articles can be reviewed more rigorously.
Campbell naturally knew this history. After receiving Konidi's reply, he thought the other party's suggestion was very reasonable, so he wrote an email to Wang Hao, "Dr. Wang Hao, regarding your latest research, we will quickly review it."
, don’t worry, it will be published in the next issue at the latest.”
Wang Hao saw Campbell's email the next day, and he felt a little baffled.
Review?
In the direction of studying the mechanism of superconductivity based on AC gravity experiments, does his research still need peer review?
Who are the colleagues?
Are there other scholars who are also studying semi-topological geometry and have achieved certain results?
Wang Hao was a little confused. He was very confident in his research, but he was unwilling to wait for the review process.
Reviewing manuscripts always feels like being "censored". Your research needs to be approved by others before it can be published, and you feel as if you are offended.
So he contacted Donald again -
Konidi.
"Science" magazine also pays great attention to him and always sends emails to him to request manuscripts, hoping that he can publish his research in "Science" magazine.
Wang Hao sent the same email.
Less than an hour later, he received a reply from Donald Conidi, "Dr. Wang Hao, your email makes me very excited."
"The moment I saw the email, I felt the blood in my whole body boil!"
"The latest research about you and your team certainly does not require review."
"In the field of science, you have stood at the highest peak. You have no peers. Even scholars in the same field, whether it is mathematics, physics, or other disciplines, they can only look up to you."
"I think peer review would be offensive to you."
"On behalf of Science magazine, I welcome your submission and look forward to your latest research!"
Looking at the content in the email, Wang Hao nodded with great satisfaction.
Do you see it?
This is called professionalism!
…
One week later.
The main thesis has been completed.
Wang Hao thought about the content of the paper for a long time, and also sent the paper to the confidentiality agency and made an explanation of the disclosure content.
After everything was completed, he uploaded the paper to arxiv, and then sent a brief summary of the results and the details of the paper to Donald Conidy's email.
Wang Hao has been studying the published content for a long time, because some technologies cannot be made public, but theories can be made public.
Even if it is just a theory, it must be published carefully. Their research includes direct calculation of the superconducting critical temperature of a combination of elements.
This part of the content is also the most important.
They also conducted detailed demonstrations and determined that just calculating a two-element combination would require a professional mathematical team a long time to complete.
If it is expanded to a three-element combination, the calculation will become extremely complicated. A top mathematics team may not be able to complete it even if it takes several months, or even more than a year. Even if it is completed, the error rate will be very high.
That requires a lot of work.
Therefore, the disclosure of the theory still has the support of superiors. Similar research also requires the participation of a large number of mathematicians, physicists and experimental groups to slowly improve the superconducting "dual element" combination system.
Only by perfecting the combination system of two elements can we progress to three elements for systematic research, instead of directly calculating the combination of three elements.
This will take a long time and involve many people, and it must be a large and systematic project.
Wang Hao already knows a three-element combination that is most consistent with the semi-topological system, which means he has a huge advantage and can directly enter the research of ultra-high temperature superconducting materials.
Other institutions in the same field, even if they rely on their public results for research, consume a lot of manpower and money, it will take at least five years or more to catch up to this step.
This is still a case of good luck. If you are unlucky, it may take longer. It may not be possible to catch up in ten or twenty years.
In fact, technological advantage is a matter of time difference.
When a technology involves the civilian field, it cannot be kept completely confidential. For example, foreign high-end materials will definitely be sold openly as long as they are involved in the civilian field. Some domestic institutions can obtain the materials and study the properties of the materials through reverse engineering.
Make up the elements and then study how to make them.
The same will be true for superconducting materials in the future. As long as it involves large-scale applications, there will definitely be institutions that carry out reverse engineering. Even if the speed is slower, it will take a few years or more than ten years to "reverse engineer it."
The so-called technological advantage does not mean that it is completely confidential, but that it is several years or more than ten years ahead of other institutions, so it will always have sufficient advantages.
Other institutions obtained higher-end products and slowly caught up over a few years, while institutions at the forefront of technology developed higher-end products.
Wang Hao completed the submission of the main paper and became a little excited.
In the next few days, he made continuous submissions, all of which were submitted to "New Advances in Mathematics"
", there are three papers in total, the main authors of which are Luo Dayong, Bill Carr and Lin Bohan.
The three papers are "Architectural Logic of Complex Geometry Splitting and Reduction", "Inverse Composition Method for Describing High-Dimensional Node Graphs" and "Trends in Definition from Topology to Semi-Topology".
In each of these papers, Wang Hao is a co-author, and he is also an author of the main paper.
…
The publication of the latest research results is the start of Science magazine's fast-forward.
"Science" magazine is very similar to "Nature" magazine. The main issue publishes some news, that is, an introduction to some of the latest results.
The introduction of the main journal is only one to two pages, just like reading a quick report, but for Wang Hao's latest achievements, "Science" gave a full five pages of content.
It can be said that a research result is introduced in five pages, which is unprecedented.
This is enough to show that Science attaches great importance to the results, and it also proves how influential the results will be. As soon as the new issue of the magazine came out, the semi-topological results attracted the attention of the world.
Just like the evaluation of the results in "Science", it was written by Donald Conidy himself, "This is research conducted by Wang Hao and his team, and it is an expansion of "the law of superconductivity and 'Wang's geometry.
"
"The "law of superconductivity" is not limited to calculating the superconducting critical temperature of a single element, but has been expanded to double elements, triple elements, and even more, including all substances."
"We can imagine that in the future we can even calculate the superconducting critical temperature of complex organic matter."
"Now we can announce that the problem of superconducting critical temperature has been completely solved, and the application of superconducting technology is about to usher in an era of explosion!"
This is definitely a major breakthrough in the theory of superconducting mechanisms, and it can even be said to have cracked the theoretical mechanism.
Wang Hao's research closely links elemental composition and superconducting critical temperature. He can directly calculate the superconducting temperature of a certain material without conducting experiments at all.
After the new issue of "Science" was released, the research immediately aroused international heated discussion.
"Previous research only focused on single elements, but now it has been extended to multiple elements, and calculations can be done directly..."
"This is so amazing. It is said that Stanford University has just established a project for this research. They have hired many mathematicians and physicists to conduct research together. As a result, Wang Hao's team has already achieved results."
"It seems they can disband directly..."
"But the calculation will definitely be complicated, right? I heard an expert say that the calculation for a single element is already very complicated. If it is two elements or three elements, the difficulty will definitely increase exponentially..."
"Anyway, with this research, it will definitely be easier to develop superconducting materials with higher critical temperatures that can be used in industry!"