From university lecturer to chief academician Chapter 258: The theory of annexation and annihilation? Wang Hao: The paper fundamentally denies string theory!
Chapter 258: The theory of annexation and annihilation? Wang Hao: The paper fundamentally denies string theory!
Edward Witten is one of the most influential theoretical physicists in the world today.
He created the M theory that unifies superstring theory and single-handedly put string theory on the throne of 'grand unification'. He was named the sixth most influential figure in contemporary times after World War II by Amerikan's "Life" weekly. The one with the highest index among physicists.
As such a heavyweight, Edward Witten is naturally very authoritative in the professional field. He also belongs to the kind of top academic journals that do not require review at all when publishing results.
When Edward Witten decided to participate in the review work, the editorial department of the journal Science immediately sent the entire paper.
"Analysis of the Big Bang Theory based on annihilation theory and string theory..."
Edward Witten was very interested after reading the title. When he got into the initial content, he frowned slightly. After he continued reading, his eyes became brighter and brighter, and he even became a little excited. .
This paper is based on the ‘high-dimensional definition of annihilation force.
Because of this, Edward Witten frowned when he saw the first part. He didn't like the content about annihilation theory because the relevant content seemed to deny string theory.
As a scholar, he tries to maintain a neutral attitude when it comes to reviewing papers.
Research on annihilation theory has twice predicted particle collision experiments, directly predicted new mesons, and even calculated the energy range.
This result is very amazing.
Of course, Edward Witten is also aware of how important the research of Wang Hao and Paul Phil Jones is, and the annihilation theory can no longer be directly denied after its development.
He can deny theories, but he cannot deny mathematics or experimental results.
Therefore, even though there were some contradictory research contents, he still read on patiently.
As he continued to read, Edward Witten gradually understood the content and suddenly became a little excited. The subsequent content was completely different from what he imagined.
The research in the paper is to analyze the annihilation force as "high-dimensional chaos. Chaos is naturally disordered. I don't know what it is specifically, or it is a force, or it is some kind of incomprehensible high-dimensional matter."
In short, I can't understand it.
This definition is completely different from the basis of annihilation theory, because the basis of annihilation theory is to define the annihilation force as the space squeeze effect.
The paper believes that all existing manifestations of the annihilation force are only manifestations of high-dimensional mapping in the three-dimensional universe, and are manifestations of the influence of high dimensions on the three-dimensional universe.
"Under the influence of the high-dimensional annihilation force, the Big Bang occurred."
"The initial singularity of the universe's explosion was just the initial manifestation of higher dimensions on the three-dimensional universe, and then the influence slowly spread, forming the Big Bang state."
"Mathematically speaking, it is a matter that creates a progressive diffusion effect. If the annihilation force is understood as high-dimensional matter, all the mass in the universe comes from higher dimensions..."
"The subsequent corollary is that gravity may occur because the mass originates from higher dimensions and is therefore repelled by lower dimensions..."
"This is an interesting statement!"
Edward Witten read the entire paper and found that some of the mathematical derivation and subsequent inferences were very interesting.
This research is definitely very novel, and its description of the Big Bang is also very novel.
More importantly, the mathematical system constructed based on the content of the paper utilizes a large part of the content of string theory. After defining the annihilation force as a high-dimensional product, the annihilation system is included in the dimensional framework of string theory.
String theory believes that the universe in which human beings live is a D3 brane in 9+1-dimensional space-time.
Then the annihilation force can be understood as chaos in the middle of 9+1 dimensional space and time.
"A novel and perfect explanation!"
This theory includes the annihilation system within the scope of string theory, and the mathematical structure is very rigorous!"
"What a genius..."
Edward Witten watched until the end, and was a little regretful that the names of the contributors would not be included in the review, but he had already defined the author of the paper as a genius in the field of string theory.
Seeing such top-notch research results, he couldn't help but feel very excited.
However, after carefully studying the mathematical structure of the paper, I felt that something was wrong. After thinking about it carefully, I couldn't find out what was wrong.
The surprise that the annihilation system was unified within the framework of string theory quickly covered up the trace of 'something wrong', and the excitement took over my heart again.
After confirming that the mathematical argument was correct, he gave the paper a pass and wrote a sentence of evaluation, "This is a major breakthrough in theoretical physics research...,
One week later.
The journal "Science-Physics" has released a new issue, including a paper of more than ten pages, which has attracted the attention of many physicists.
"Analysis of the Big Bang Theory based on Annihilation Theory and String Theory"
Author, Ledley Parsons.
After the paper was officially released, the response from the international physics community was very strong. The new research incorporated the annihilation system into the framework of string theory. The mathematical content of the argument was extremely rigorous and no problems could be found at all.
More importantly, new research combines annihilation theory and string theory to provide a new explanation of the Big Bang, which is equivalent to combining the two.
At the same time, the annihilation system is classified into the eleven-dimensional space system of string theory.
To a certain extent, the research included the annihilation system within the research scope of string theory, which naturally aroused a lot of heated public discussion.
Naturally, some physicists can't stand it. They are not fans of string theory. Many people are very disgusted with string theory. However, annihilation theory can deduce experiments and analyze and calculate new particles in advance, and the results are incorporated
into the string theory system?
"This is bastard logic."
The famous astronomer, Professor Rawlison Peron of Stanford University, said bluntly, "I admit that its explanation of the Big Bang is indeed very novel, and the mathematical argument is very rigorous, but it forcibly pulls the annihilation system into the string theory.
system, but in fact, it just uses some mathematical content of string theory, and it can be said to be completely new research."
"The eleven-dimensional framework of string theory is too broad, and whether the 9+1-dimensional space they say exists may not be confirmed for another 10,000 years."
"Because of the high-dimensional nature of the annihilation force, it makes no sense to forcefully say that the annihilation force is in a 9+1-dimensional space."
"The research is good, but the extension is terrible!"
Many physicists have the same idea as Rawlison-Peron.
They appreciate the content of the research, but scorn some irrelevant explanations.
If we only take the main content of the paper, it is just a reconstruction of the mathematical system of the Big Bang based on the high-dimensional behavior of the annihilation force. The parts related to string theory only use some mathematical content.
Of course, string theory scholars don't see it that way.
The main body of the paper uses the mathematical framework related to string theory to combine annihilation theory and string theory, which is equivalent to bundling the two.
Annihilation theory is correct, and string theory is naturally correct.
Then it is natural for the annihilation system to be incorporated into the string theory system. After all, string theory has been developed for decades, and annihilation theory is only a theory that has just emerged.
Many physicists have been arguing about this in their respective platforms.
This is what is happening in the international physics community.
.........
Saikai University.
Wang Hao didn't know about the new research yet, but he received good news. The Academy of Sciences announced the final list of candidates for the co-optation of academicians, and his name was clearly on it.
The interesting data is that a total of 16 people from the Department of Mathematical Physics have made the final list of candidates, of which only three are studying pure mathematics.
One of them is someone I know--
Professor Zhong Mingchu of Donggang University.
When Zhong Mingchu and Wang Hao won the Chen Shengshen Mathematics Award together, Wang Hao plagiarized Zhong Mingchu's acceptance speech on the spot, so the memory is naturally quite profound.
Now that both of them have entered the final candidate list, there is a high probability that they will also be elected as academicians together.
That's almost no suspense.
There are only three academician candidates left in the mathematics category, and not surprisingly, all three of them can be selected.
Pan Weiguo called and congratulated Wang Hao in advance for being elected as an academician. Because it was already the final candidate stage and there was only one month until the academic conference was held, so it was only a matter of time before he was elected.
Pan Weiguo also talked about Zhong Mingchu and said with a smile, "Zhong Mingchu was ready to give up at first, but later he decided to continue participating after being persuaded by the old academician."
"His question is overlapping with your field. Number theory, it doesn't matter if you change the field."
"Academician Ying advised him that you have too many fields, differential equations, number theory, and even geometry, all of which have results that can win the Nobel Prize, and the opportunities to be evaluated as academicians are limited. If you give up participating next time, you may not be able to be evaluated.
Professor Zhong then decided to continue participating."
"But when the time comes, it might be a little embarrassing. Wang Hao just smiled after hearing this. He really didn't expect that his influence would be so great, and that he would actually influence many mathematics students.
Select people give up the selection.
I just listen to things like this.
For any domestic scholar, the selection of academicians is very important. Some people will definitely be elected as academicians in the future, so it doesn't matter if they give up.
Some of them may not be rated, so you must strive for opportunities.
Becoming an academician is a matter for the rest of your life.
For many scholars, the title of academician is much greater than face and some public opinion controversies.
Wang Hao has some expectations for being elected as an academician.
This year he has been exceptionally promoted to a first-level professor, and with the title of academician, he can be said to have reached the pinnacle personally, and there is no way he can be promoted.
Of course, now he no longer cares about professional titles and titles.
Just as Wang Hao put down the phone, the office door was pushed open.
Paul Phil-Jones walked in with a little anger, "Wang Hao, do you know?"
"What?"
"In the latest issue of "Science" magazine, Ridley, his new achievement, the annihilation system, has been incorporated into the framework of string theory. It is simply unreasonable to draw a conclusion just by listing a nine-plus-one-dimensional framework!"
Paul Phil-Jones said angrily and put the printed paper on the table.
Wang Hao frowned, took the paper and read it, "Based on the higher dimensions of the annihilation force, reshape the mathematical system of the Big Bang theory?"
"Yes, part of the framework content of string theory is used." Paul Phil-Jones said angrily, "It's unreasonable! Just using part of the mathematical content, you directly want to annex annihilation theory? What kind of logic is this?"
He felt really angry.
Now when talking about the annihilation theory, the first thing that scholars around the world think of is Wang Hao, and the second thing that comes to mind is him, Paul Phil-Jones.
Annihilation theory has become the most popular physical theory. Because it can directly predict particle collision experiments, it has received even more attention than string theory.
That stupid Ridley actually made a new study and wanted to incorporate the annihilation system into string theory?
Absolutely unacceptable!
Wang Hao shook his head lightly and said, "This is impossible."
He proposed the annihilation theory. Naturally, he was very aware of the conflict between annihilation theory and string theory. It was simply impossible to incorporate the annihilation system into string theory.
"There must be something wrong with this study."
Wang Haodao, "Let's study it together and see what's wrong with it."
"good!"
Paul Phil-Jones nodded seriously.
Next, the two of them did research together. They soon discovered that there was no problem with the overall structure of mathematics, but there was no problem with the details.
No need to pursue it.
This paper was reviewed by Edward Witten and was published in the journal Science Physics. Detailed errors have long been found.
In the overall mathematical structure, there are many framework contents that are defined out of imagination.
This isn't a problem either.
Research in theoretical physics is like this. The purpose of research is to provide a way to explain physical phenomena, not to prove anything.
What is theoretical physics?
For example, if you see an apple falling on the ground, theoretical physics can provide an explanation. The explanation can be 'the earth has special magnetism and can attract organic matter,' or 'the earth has an attraction and can attract all things, etc.'
Regarding the problem of the apple falling on the ground, each of the above explanations can be justified. As long as it makes sense, it is correct research.
It is the job of experimental physicists to verify which explanation is correct.
They studied it carefully together for more than two hours and found no problems."
Wang Hao frowned and said firmly, "No, there must be something wrong."
Paul Field-Jones said, "There is no logical problem with this part of the mathematical argument. His analysis is very reasonable and this application is correct. But what is the problem?"
"Maybe it's the very beginning? Let's take a look at it together..."
While the two were discussing continuously, Zhang Zhiqiang walked in quietly. He came to talk to Wang Hao about the cooperation project of Shencheng Aeroengine Research Institute. Just seeing that the two of them were seriously involved in the research, he could only
Wait quietly aside.
As a result, I heard the two people talking continuously, "Annihilation theory and string theory are in conflict at the bottom level, so there must be problems in the research."
"I think so too. The key is where is the problem?"
"The mathematical argument in the middle part is logically clear..."
"Several definitions are okay..."
Zhang Zhiqiang waited for a long time, but the two of them were still studying. He couldn't wait any longer, so he simply said, "If you can't find the problem, maybe there will be no problem?"
"Ugh!"
Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones looked up at Zhang Zhiqiang at the same time.
Paul Phil-Jones glanced at Zhang Zhiqiang and immediately lowered his head indifferently.
Wang Hao was stunned and suddenly said, "Yeah, maybe it's no problem!"
"How is it possible?" Paul Field-Jones said, "The underlying definitions of the two theories are in conflict."
Wang Hao shook his head and said, "Maybe the research is correct?"
Paul Phil-Jones wondered, "Do you think the research is correct? Doesn't it mean that string theory and annihilation theory can be combined..."
"of course not......."
Wang Hao smiled and said, "I mean, for annihilation theory, the research is correct, but for string theory, it is not necessarily true."
He thought for a moment and then explained, "I've figured it out."
"There is indeed nothing wrong with the content of this paper. It is a standard theoretical physics result of the 'annihilation theory'. It just uses part of the mathematical content of string theory."
"At the same time, it basically denies string theory!"
"String theory's explanation for the differences in particles is that the strings vibrate in different ways and shapes. This paper is based on the annihilation theory. The initial mathematical structure uses the concept of mass units in the annihilation system."
"In other words, it directly denies the explanation of the composition of particles in string theory and affirms the concept of perfect mass units making up particles."
"So, it directly denies string theory on a fundamental basis!"