Wang Hao’s meager number of fans is very small, but some people still see it when he publishes it.
After reading it carefully, many people immediately liked, forwarded and commented.
Determined by the algorithm of the website, the ultra-high like rate, forwarding rate, and meager comment rate will bring more traffic, and it will grow exponentially.
Five minutes, dozens of reads, a dozen likes, a few retweets, and two comments.
Later it increased rapidly.
Ten minutes, thousands of reads, dozens of likes, a dozen retweets, and a dozen comments.
Twenty minutes, tens of thousands of reads, hundreds of likes, hundreds of retweets, and hundreds of comments.
Just one hour later, the number of views on Weibo exceeded 500,000, the number of retweets exceeded 1,000, and the number of comments also exceeded 1,000.
Many people who saw the news, paid attention to the account information that posted the message on Weibo, and contacted the content of the forwarded article were immediately surprised.
When similar exposure incidents occur on the Internet, universities usually hide them. Even in public relations, they only say that they will conduct an investigation, and it often takes a long time before they release information on the investigation and processing results.
The parties involved are rarely seen and can only wait for reporters to conduct subsequent interviews.
It's better now.
In the Xihai University special appointment incident, the person who published seven papers came forward directly. Instead of clarifying or explaining the papers or appointment, he said, 'It's not seven, it's ten?'
The parties concerned have come forward to add fuel to the fire!
Seven articles, not enough?
Ten articles?
Many netizens who paid attention to the incident were shocked. They imagined that the follow-up was that Xihai University would investigate the incident, then quickly dismiss the party involved in the "paper fraud", and respond to the media that there were problems in the school's recruitment process.
Inadequate supervision and so on.
In short, the person involved will definitely not dare to come forward and will definitely be dismissed from the university.
Now the person involved has not only come forward, but also added fuel to the fire by saying, 'It's not seven articles, it's ten articles?'
Some Internet celebrities who followed the trend and commented felt like they were being slapped directly in the face, and they didn’t know what to say for a while.
How do you say this?
How to comment?
It seems that the person involved stood up and spoke. Not only did he speak, but he also acted indifferently and confidently, adding fuel to the fire, "You said there were less, it was ten articles!"
"Come on? Continue?"
How can there be such an arrogant academic brush? He doesn't play by the rules at all!
Some people immediately responded, "The background is real, right? You're not afraid of checking, right? Ten more articles? That's even more problematic!"
"This matter must be investigated to the end!"
Some media news accounts didn’t have so many ideas. They immediately forwarded it and added, “#西海paperincidentsuspected party’s response# is not seven articles, but ten!”
Some netizens who had just seen the news, after paying attention to the whole process, suspected that they had seen fake news, and also suspected that the so-called parties involved were not parties at all.
How could any of the parties involved respond in this way?
really!
This is not a response, it is completely arrogant, adding fuel to the fire, and it is too arrogant, right?
…
There are some dark study rooms with only the computer screen shining.
Liao Zhenyu is sitting at the computer desk, with excitement in his eyes. He is the author of "In the context of eradicating theoreticalism, some top leaders in universities commit crimes".
As the author who initiated the news, he will of course keep an eye on the progress.
When other people saw the reply that "the suspected party is adding fuel to the fire", they either scolded them back without thinking, or they suspected that the party was fake, or they thought about it carefully, did they make a mistake?
Why is the other party so confident?
Liao Zhenyu is different.
The first thing he thought of was traffic. The parties' "return"-style responses would definitely bring greater traffic.
Liao Zhenyu suddenly became energetic, thought about it carefully, and immediately posted on Weibo, "#西海paperincidentsuspected party responds# Faced with the exciting public opinion, the party involved was emboldened and added fuel to the fire.
‘Seven articles? No, ten!’
It was such a ridiculous thing to write ten papers in one and a half months. Maybe he believed it himself and felt proud of it.
We cannot understand what this kind of person is thinking, but we must stand from the standpoint of the majority of scientific researchers and resolutely resist this kind of "academic brush", this kind of academic cancer that relies on "paper brushing" to rise to the top.
If such a person can rise to the top, it will be the greatest insult to the majority of scientific researchers!"
There is also a picture below, which shows an ancient official standing in front of the ragged poor people and shouting with arrogance, "You untouchables still dare to resist?"
Pictures add fuel to the fire.
Liao Zhenyu suddenly felt great again. He was standing on the side of the majority of scientific researchers and speaking out for them.
Then, he paid attention to the data.
With the newly posted meager data, the data has skyrocketed exponentially in a short period of time, and a large number of likes, comments, and reposts have brought even greater traffic.
He happily made calculations, "With this traffic, maybe it can reach the top ten hot searches?"
"In this wave, the income can exceed two million! The minimum is two million, and there will be more income in the future!"
"Get rich!"
Liao Zhenyu's eyes were shining with gold. In fact, he just used the excuse to publish an article at first. At that time, he was really emotional and felt that he was on the side of justice.
Unexpectedly, the article would become so popular and the topic would become a hot search topic.
Then, he received a call from his old superior, saying that the person he mentioned was capable, that every paper was a real achievement, and that there was no plagiarism or plagiarism, and asked him to delete the article directly.
Delete?
How can it be!
Liao Zhenyu was indeed surprised at the time, but after the article became popular, right or wrong became unimportant. What mattered was traffic and advertising revenue.
Traffic is king!
Traffic is money!
In the end, Liao Zhenyu still couldn't resist the favor. More importantly, he was worried that Donggang University would be too powerful, so he deleted the last sentence, leaving only Xihai University in question. What else was he afraid of?
…
#西海paperincidentsuspected party’s response#, the topic’s hot searches soared rapidly, and even reached the top three in the early morning.
A lot of attention, a lot of discussion, some people stayed up until 12 o'clock and continued to browse.
Liao Zhenyu thinks he is on the side of scientific researchers?
Actually, no.
Huang Kai is a standard scientific researcher. He is a chemical engineer who has been waiting in the laboratory for a long time. He only completed the experiment in the early morning and simply slept in the laboratory.
Then, he can enjoy his own leisure before going to bed, habitually turn on his mobile phone, and browse the hot news on the Internet.
He immediately saw #西海paperincidentsuspected party’s response#.
Huang Kai carefully read the article "In the era of eradicating thesis-onlyism, some top universities committed crimes", and he was also amused that someone could write seven papers in a month.
Seven articles?
impossible!
Then he continued digging and discovered that seven articles was really too little. The 'suspected party' added fuel to the fire and said it was 'ten articles.' Only then did he finally understand why it was so popular.
The parties concerned came forward not to clarify or explain, but to add fuel to the fire and say it was "ten articles"?
Feel confident?
Why?
Huang Kai will not vent his emotions on the Internet and follow the trend of abuse for no reason. When faced with any problem, he will think carefully and investigate the reason.
He immediately studied the three pictures of the 'participant's response'.
Most people on the Internet don't study it because they simply can't understand it. The three pictures are all emails in English, and there are a lot of professional terms in them. It's impossible to translate them with software. Most people just know the text they sent.
The pictures are related to the paper.
Huang Kai has a PhD in chemistry and has written several SCI articles, but he can still understand most of them.
Three papers are all mathematics papers.
Two of the emails were receipt confirmation letters from unfamiliar foreign magazines.
Another email seems to be from "Acta Mathematica"?
No way?
Huang Kai opened his mouth in surprise. He suddenly became very energetic. He simply stopped lying down and turned on the computer to check carefully. Only then did he confirm that the email was indeed from "Journal of Mathematics", not the domestic "Journal of Mathematics", but
"Acta-Mathematicas".
"Acta-Mathematicas", what is the concept?
There are more than 1,500 influential mathematics journals in the world. "Acta-Mathematica" is recognized as one of the most difficult mathematics journals to publish. It is published by the Mittag-Leffler Institute of the Royal Academy of Sciences and is one of the four top mathematics comprehensive journals.
One of the journals.
The point is that the number of papers published in "Acta-Mathematica" is very rare.
Two volumes and four issues are published a year, with a total of only a dozen papers.
From its establishment in 1882 to the present, "Acta-Mathematica" has published 2,097 papers, with an average of about 17 papers published every year. The difficulty of publishing is far higher than that of the three well-known top journals "Nature", "Science" and "Cell".
In the past few decades, domestic scholars have only published eight papers in "Acta-Mathematica". It is also recognized that if you can publish a paper in "Acta-Mathematica", your ability has reached or even far exceeded the level of outstanding young people.
.
The email screenshot taken by the party concerned is not a confirmation receipt of the review, but a notification of a change in the review status, but just a change in the review status is also remarkable.
This shows that the paper has passed the first review of the journal, has exceeded more than 95% of the submissions, and has been sent to the review expert group.
Huang Kai is very aware of the review rules of top foreign journals. The first review is often the most difficult to pass. Passing the first review means that the content of the paper meets the publication standards.
The expert team of "Acta-Mathematica" are all top mathematicians, and there are several Fields and Wolf winners, which is very common.
The expert group reviews the paper process.
As long as a paper can pass the first review, the probability of passing the second review is at least over 30%.
When the research reached this point, Huang Kai had already concluded, "This so-called client is definitely a big deal!"
Then he couldn't help but send a meager note--
"I've been studying for a long time and I don't quite understand. Who gave you the courage to question a math master whose paper passed the first review of "Acta-Mathematica"?
Liang Jingru?
Such a big boss, let alone a temporary teaching and research fellow, comes to our school and pays directly to the associate professor, and also gives another million in housing allowance!"