"Then let's talk about Madeleine." Schiller said again: "I think you should also see that Madeleine is not a normal person. In fact, I highly doubt that this seemingly pitiful woman is
The real murderer of their family’s massacre.”
Batman finally came to his senses because Schiller began to speculate, so he asked: "Why are you so suspicious?"
"Because of that research notebook."
It's finally here, Batman thought. Sure enough, every Schiller can directly guess the truth through a little bit of fragmentary clues.
When Schiller mentioned the research notes, Batman thought that he could only use psychoanalysis to reach the conclusion that Madeleine was the murderer.
Because there is actually nothing wrong with that notebook and it is not enough evidence to judge a person's personality, but Schiller still said this, indicating that he may have empathized with something.
Unexpectedly, Schiller said: "According to my experience, Madeleine acted too coldly when she mentioned what happened to her family. She may be a narcissistic psychopath."
"Experience? What experience?"
"Some... experience in dealing with criminals." Schiller paused and then continued: "I have seen many similar criminals, and they all gave me this feeling."
"So it's also a feeling?"
Schiller shook his head and said: "I'm just making a general statement. If you must pursue details, I can say that Madeleine's wording has an obvious God's perspective, macroscopic and objective."
Schiller leaned back in his chair and said while recalling: "Everyone lives in the first person, so when they describe what they see, they must be subjective."
"For example, when murderers confess the facts of their crimes, they will conceal something. Some of them are to deliberately reduce their guilt, but some of them are unintentional."
"And some of these inadvertent concealments are because their brains beautify themselves, while others are due to information gaps caused by subjective perspectives."
"They often say 'I saw' or 'I think', which is an obvious subjective narrative, such as 'I saw him lying in the corner with blood on his face, and I wondered if he was
dead'."
"These are some confessions that I often hear, and I think you should also hear them often, because although many murderers are brutal, they are mentally normal and are not madmen or perverts. This kind of narrative method is what normal people should have."
"And Madeleine is not. Her perspective when describing such an incident is 'someone fell in a corner somewhere, and he was killed.' This is not a subjective narrative at all, but more like an objective judgment.
.”
"If what she is talking about has nothing to do with her at all, it may still be explained, but what she is describing is the death of her relatives. Once the identities of her relatives are put into it, you will find that this sentence is terrifyingly indifferent."
"Who on earth, when describing the death of a loved one, would directly say, 'My mother fell in the corner of the kitchen, she was killed', 'My sister was lying on the dining table, there was a triangular hole in her chest', or
'The father was lying face down on the stairs with two blood stains on the top of his arm'?"
"Perhaps Madeleine later was very good, and she learned how to summarize one thing in the most concise words, but she was not very old when she experienced all this, and her subjective consciousness is more easily affected by emotions, so what remains in her memory is
The picture shouldn't be as clear and objective as an autopsy report. Even if she talks about a bunch of monsters, I think it's more normal."
"This proves that when Madeleine went through all this, she did not break down because of fear. She did not even feel fear. She accepted it all calmly, remembered it all, and remained calm after many years.
Can retell it clearly."
"This is actually a very scary thing. If this whole thing is not a disaster for her, then what is the possibility that she became a survivor because of luck?"
"To sum up, I think Madeleine has a mental disorder and is more likely to be a born psychopath. Of course, there is no substantive evidence to speculate that she caused this tragedy, but it is absolutely impossible for her to
As she described herself, she was a completely innocent victim."
After listening to all this, Batman discovered that Schiller has a very keen insight and is also a very good detective regardless of analytical methods.
But Batman couldn't put aside the analysis method, because he already had an idea of these conclusions after reading Madeleine's diary, and what he wanted was something deeper behind it.
"Psychopath?" Batman asked. This kind of thing involving professional psychological knowledge may lead to Schiller's analysis of Madeleine's personality.
But what I didn't expect was that Schiller began to analyze the clown.
He used the difference between Madeline and the Joker as an introduction to profoundly demonstrate to Batman the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath.
Many people say that the Joker is a lunatic, but to be more specific, he is a person with antisocial personality disorder. He is mentally ill in a broad sense, but he is not a lunatic in the public perception.
The reason has been mentioned before. The clown is rational and all his actions are profit-oriented. But because the interests he pursues are inherently evil, it makes him look crazy.
The biggest difference between psychopaths and psychopaths is that psychopaths are not profit-oriented, but desire-oriented.
Let’s put it this way, throughout the ages, many upper-class celebrities have suffered from antisocial personality disorder, and even in modern times, many people have admitted this.
The reason why this problem occurs is because antisocial personality disorder is highly profit-oriented, even excessively profit-oriented, which means that in order to achieve their own interests, they will do anything to achieve their own interests, ignore all social rules, ignore morality, and even be able to
Ignore instinct and destroy human nature.
Although it is a bit cruel, we have to admit that this kind of character that does not recognize any relatives is more likely to achieve success in the sociological sense.
It's not that upper-class people are more likely to suffer from antisocial personality disorder, but that people with antisocial personality disorder are more likely to become upper-class people.
But people more often see psychopaths in the lower classes.
Don't think that psychopaths are crazy and go out on the streets to kill people with knives. There are only a handful of people who are serious enough to do this, but mild psychopaths are widely present among the public.
One of their typical characteristics is that they harm others without benefiting themselves.
This is exactly opposite to the high interest orientation of antisocial personality disorder. Psychopaths do not pursue interests and can even give up interests in order to satisfy their own desires.
For example, a game is almost won, teammates are sent off, group assignments are almost completed, someone makes trouble, the project is going smoothly, the troublemaker comes, the job the child is looking for is good, they must
It's turned yellow.
What's more important is that these spoilers are actually members of the team themselves, also known as insiders.
Many people will find this kind of person unreasonable, because it is obvious that this matter will develop for the better and it will be beneficial to them.
If they win the game, they can get points, and if their group work is praised by the teacher, they will also benefit from it, but they insist on making trouble, they are like crazy, and they can't figure out their logic no matter what.
But in fact, this is a manifestation of psychopathy.
After winning the game, they want to send it off. It’s not that they don’t want to get higher points, but that they simply feel that they can’t make their teammates happy. To be more precise, they can’t make their teammates feel more happy than me.
The group homework is almost finished, and they want to cause trouble. It's not that they are not afraid of the teacher's reprimand, but rather than being reprimanded by the teacher together, they don't want other students to be more important in the teacher's heart than they are.
Other things follow the same analogy, so this kind of psychopathy has a prefix called narcissism.
To be more specific, in order to prevent anyone from surpassing themselves in any aspect, they can sacrifice any interests to satisfy their perverted desires.
It is conceivable that it is impossible for such a person to get along well.
Giving away some people in the game or ruining a group assignment is indeed not considered a failure, but the key point is that this kind of psychopathic symptoms cannot be controlled freely. When they make key choices in life, they will also
Give in to perverted desires and give up easy-to-get benefits.
If you lose a city today and a pond tomorrow, sooner or later you will give up your entire life.
If you observe these people carefully, you will find that most of their real lives are failures.
Some of them may be able to pretend for a while, but they will definitely make a few key mistakes like crazy, make their ugly face known to everyone, and then mess up their lives.
Many people may wonder why some people are neither incompetent nor stupid, but lose their minds at critical moments in life, and continue to decline until they hit rock bottom, unable to turn over no matter how hard they struggle.
Most people will think that they are unlucky, but in fact, they may be psychopaths who succumb to their perverted desires and ignore their own interests.
In Schiller's view, Madeleine's life trajectory was very consistent with this standard. It was probably full of ups and downs, and until her death, the goals she set for herself were not achieved.
If this character was made up by someone else, there is still a possibility of coincidence, but the person who made up this character is Greedy. He is a psychiatrist and is very familiar with similar cases.
Another piece of evidence that convinced Schiller that Madeleine had a mental problem was that Greed was a very greedy person, and he would not only want profit when he could gain both fame and fortune.
He set himself up as a rich second generation, which is not unexpected, but he set himself up as an unscrupulous capitalist who bullies the lower class, which actually goes against his logic.
When the background story can be set as he likes, he can completely set himself up as a wealthy and righteous person. Money is not completely linked to evil. If you can have them all, why only have the same one?
Therefore, Schiller firmly believes that there must be a reversal of the background story that greed has set for himself, and the most difficult thing to clean up is simply not paying compensation to Madeleine's family.
If this case itself does not meet the compensation standards and is an insurance fraud case deliberately designed by someone, then there will be no problem with what Siltec Medical Insurance Company did, and greed will naturally be washed away.
The life experience written in Madeleine's research notebook is naturally a foreshadowing laid by greed, which will then become strong evidence that Madeleine is the villain.
Schiller believed that as long as he sent this note to a professional psychiatric appraisal agency, he would be able to conclude that Madeleine was mentally ill. This was done deliberately by greed.
It can only be said that fortunately it was Bruce who played the role of a psychiatrist in this story. Because of his amazing academic level, he was not able to discover the error in the notes at the first time.
Others couldn't speak out when they found out because of their professional incompatibility, which allowed Greed to maintain the image of this villain.
At this time, Schiller suddenly realized that if Greed actually wanted to play a decent role, then just reversing the matter of refusing to pay would not work. In addition to whitewashing the human body experiment, he also had to invite everyone to the experiment.
Provide a reasonable explanation, otherwise wouldn’t he still be a kidnapper?
If this is the case, then when Batman knew all this and still allowed others to be invited to the laboratory, did he guess that greed was actually not prepared to do anything to them?
Schiller couldn't help but look at Batman again, thinking that he really deserves to be Batman.