Everyone was stunned by the scene in front of them. They racked their brains and couldn't figure out how to make a hole here and water could continuously spurt out from it.
"Commander Yang, is it possible that... you know magic?"
Black Eagle asked in surprise. Apart from this explanation, he really couldn't think of any other reason.
"Well, you're smart. You're right. My true identity is actually a professional mage!"
Yang Xuan narrowed his eyes and smiled.
The red bird on the side stamped his feet and said, "Yang Xuan, it's now this time, stop being so pretentious and tell everyone what's going on."
Cardinal grew up in the Cardinal Church, but what makes her different from others is that she is good at independent thinking and dares to question the values that have been instilled in her environment since she was a child.
She believes that there may really be gods and the like in this world, and she firmly believes that there are many strange things in this world that are beyond the knowledge of human beings.
But she has always been disapproving of spells and the like.
Local people have been taught many stories about gods since childhood, saying that as long as they believe in their gods, their gods will protect them.
For this reason, there are many legends about gods. For example, a long time ago, the gods scattered beans and formed soldiers, summoned the invincible King Kong, and with the light of a luminous pearl in the palm of his hand, he blew away the incoming enemies like dust.
Cardinal believes that there may really be gods, but she has her own opinions on these so-called "real cases" about gods.
She believes that these so-called "real cases" do not exist at all.
If the people here really had such powerful gods to protect them, how could so many disasters happen?
Every time they faced the enemy, they fought on their own and never saw the shadow of the gods.
Cardinal believes that there are two kinds of gods in the world. One kind of gods is real. They have transcended everything in the world and coordinate the operation of the laws of the world.
In its eyes, everyone in this world is equal, and it will never help anyone because of who believes in it. The real god will not care whether mortals believe in it, nor will it interfere in mortal affairs, because everything
In its view, these are just the basic laws of the universe.
The other type of gods was created by humans themselves.
In fact, this god does not exist at all, it is just a non-existent thing created by human beings in order to achieve certain goals of their own.
Many people live miserable lives and cannot see any hope for the future, so they can only invent a god to bless them.
This kind of thinking is used by some people with ulterior motives. Those people with ulterior motives make up a god and claim to be the incarnation of the god or the messenger of the god.
The idea is spread that if you believe in gods and fear gods, you can get protection from gods.
In order to hide these thoughts, they also made up a set of theories about past and present lives. The reason why they did not live well in this life is because they did evil in the previous life. If they want to live a good life in the next life, they must believe in the gods and follow the instructions of the gods in this life.
and thoughts.
The logical relationship of "cause and effect" has been replaced by a concept. Anyway, these things about past and future lives are illusory, and no one dares to prove whether there is real reincarnation, so they just take whatever they say.
In order to deal with some people's doubts about the authenticity of past and present lives, they fabricated many "real cases" about reincarnation in some of their own documents.
These "real cases" are very richly described, and the time, place and characters are all vivid and vivid.
But these different "real cases" all have one thing in common: they are all in the past.
Moreover, no one has ever performed it live, or come up with a piece of ironclad evidence that exists at the moment, all based on just one mouth.
Cardinal had attended a Dharma conference held by the Red Sect before. That Dharma conference was aimed at non-religious people, and most people believed in the teachings of the Dharma conference.
But one of them raised a question, saying that no one had experienced it in the past and present lives, and no one knew whether it existed or not. He asked the person who preached the teachings of the Dharma Conference to come up with actual evidence.
The person who preached the teachings of the Dharma Conference did not panic and did not answer the question directly. Instead, he smiled and asked the person who raised the question a question.
He asked the other person what he had for lunch on a Monday three years ago. The person shook his head and said how could he still remember it after so long.
So the person who preached the teachings of the Dharma Conference said that just because he could not remember what happened on a certain day three years ago, it did not mean that that day three years ago did not exist.
By the same token, if people don't remember things from their previous lives, it doesn't prove that past lives don't exist. There are yesterday, today, and tomorrow in this world, so why can't there be distinctions between past lives, present lives, and future lives?
At that time, these words won the applause of the whole house, convincing those who had doubts, and firmly believed in the theory of past and present lives.
But the Cardinals at the time found a huge loophole in this seemingly watertight rhetoric.
It is impossible for people to remember what happened every day in the past, but it does not mean that they remember nothing. Certain days where special events occurred, such as festivals, celebrations, or some very special things happened that day, can be remembered.
Clearly.
But why can’t I remember anything about my past life?
Therefore, using yesterday, today, and tomorrow to explain past, present, and future lives simply does not work. It is just a stolen concept.
After having more exposure to similar teachings, Cardinal discovered an even more unexplainable huge loophole.
These teachings may seem reasonable, logically rigorous, and well-argued, but if you think deeply, you will find that all the logic and arguments of these teachings are based on imagination and do not have any real evidence.
For example, the various gods in these teachings have happened in various places, various magic weapons and various places. When someone raises questions, they will never answer directly, but will ask the other party why they say these things do not exist.
.
If you answer, you have already lost.
Because proving that something does not exist is itself a false proposition and can never be proven.
For example, the paradise most frequently mentioned in the teachings. If someone questions why they have never seen it before, the teachings will explain that it is because you have not looked far enough.
Then you answered that the Hubble Telescope, the most advanced telescope in the world, can observe scenes 13 billion light-years away, but it still has not seen the Paradise.
So the teachings explained that the world of bliss is further away.
This leads to an unbreakable endless loop. Even if you give an example of being able to observe every corner of the entire universe, the doctrine will explain that the Paradise is in another time and space, which of course cannot be seen in this time and space.
However, these simple logics still elude those believers.
The reason is actually very simple. The more people who believe in these doctrines from the bottom of their hearts, almost all live a poor life. They lack knowledge and culture, so they lack the ability to think independently, and they are easily tricked into it, and eventually their spirits are firmly controlled.
Hongque actually figured out these truths a long time ago, but because of the surrounding environment, these remarks were absolutely treasonous, so she could only bury them in her heart.
So at this time, she didn't believe it at all when it came to "spells". She knew there must be a reasonable explanation behind it.