Although the law and regulations have always been monogamy, and the two-child policy was later relaxed, this trend of thought has always existed. Didn't a certain news say that someone's method of bribing someone is very trendy, and the method of using surrogacy allows the woman to be pregnant?
Those who bribe have more children born.
The argument is that so-and-so's genes are so good that one or two are not enough. This simply delays the spread of good genes. It would be better to have more children. With more children born, good genes can be spread more widely. Anyway,
This method of bribery is still super weird, and I don’t know what the briber was thinking. But it is undeniable that this method was successful, and the bribe recipient had two more children.
This method is really a bit speechless. The briber and the briber are like kings looking at mung beans - they look at each other. This shows that there is still a certain market for this idea, which is why there is such a weird bribery method.
Appear.
Even a well-known writer meant this: He said that some people should have more children if their genes are good, which is conducive to genetic optimization. So how to determine whether their genes are good? Just because they are powerful, they have good genes?
But there is never a shortage of new upstarts in the world.
In fact, if you check the ancestors of everyone in Kyushu, maybe everyone will have a noble ancestor - there are so many princes and nobles, so this so-called argument that if you have good genes, you should have more children, it is really boring. In addition,
Why do you feel this argument is inexplicably familiar?
Ling Xiao was reminded of the propaganda of a certain Third Reich: the theory of racial superiority. It is said that people in the world are divided into eight grades (1). The first four are all white: Aryan, Germanic, peaceful, and Indian.
Aryan descendants, and the yellow race ranked fifth. It was on this argument that Germany and the two alliances started World War II, and eventually became a defeated country.
So Ling Xiao wants to ask: Does that so-called argument really have a scientific basis? Is this method really conducive to genetic optimization? In fact, everyone will find out why many genius parents are not geniuses?
Even the descendants of some geniuses are not all powerful. There are very good descendants who have inherited the skills of their ancestors, but most of them are lost in the crowd and are no better than children born from ordinary people.
The funniest thing is that in order to prevent people from saying that he belongs to that feudal school, the writer embellished the so-called stallion theory and said that this standard should be for both men and women, which means that men can find more women, and women will naturally
You can also find a few more men.
Listening to what he said, this excuse that is conducive to genetic optimization is simply the best excuse for a prodigal in the flower world to go out for a wander. Taking more boats is not a man's playfulness, it is for the purpose of optimizing genes. It's righteous! It's great! It's wonderful! These days
Even the excuses for cheating are so fresh and refined, and they are still hanging high.
In fact, don’t you just want to engage in polygamy? What about genetic improvement? It’s just selling dog meat over sheep’s heads. And real genetic improvement should be like in science fiction, where men and women marry not for love, but for the purpose of optimizing genes.
Carry out what is called matching.
Of course, Ling Xiao is not advocating this so-called genetic optimization behavior. Just imagining it like this makes Ling Xiao feel extremely cold. The education she has received has always been: marriage emphasizes love, not genetic matching. It is possible
Two men and women who are not very suitable after genetic combination will be shot by Cupid's arrow. So can they be together? Or will they be separated directly?
Only Ling Xiao can feel the cold. I hope society will not reach that point. After all, who is willing to admit that their genes are inferior? No! Even if most people know that there are some problems, they are not willing to admit that they are inferior. So will it happen?
Do you need to test your genes as soon as you are born? Set a frame at birth. As for inferior genes, you don’t need to pass them on. Probably all people will be furious when they hear this possibility.
In addition, the so-called inferior genes are inferior now, but it does not mean they will be inferior in the future. There is no way to determine superiority and inferiority. For example, genetic problems such as diabetes and high blood pressure are said to be the reason why ancient people were able to survive in ancient times.
, so are these genes superior or inferior?
And in the early years when aluminum first appeared, its charming metallic luster and very light and airy qualities made aluminum favored by many people. Because after its discovery, the initial quantity was so small that a crown was even specially made.
But later, after aluminum was discovered to be easy to manufacture, its value plummeted and it became the most common metal. It was so cheap that sometimes I really didn’t know how to tell the difference between good and bad.
But what Ling Xiao can be sure of is that the argument of insisting on optimizing genes is terrible. If society really develops to this point, wouldn't it mean that the children you want to have are not allowed to have children, and you have to have a child that meets the standard?
Will there not be more Liang Shanbo and Zhu Yingtai?
In addition, she also wanted to say, please don't bring female compatriots with you. This reminded Ling Xiao of a professor's argument that he once heard, saying that because men are born with more women than women at the same time, there will inevitably be some men.
Being unable to get married makes them unstable.
In order to reduce the number of singles, the marriage market should be liberalized and encourage one woman to marry n men. After seeing this statement, Ling Xiao had a creepy feeling. His first thought after seeing this was to give this guy who made the weird argument
A few slaps.
What is this? If this is really implemented, will it improve the status of women? Ling Xiao feels that it cannot be done, because a person's status should depend on how much money he can get. Only with an economic foundation can this be possible
Improve your social status. Books say: the economic base determines the superstructure.
Just imagining it, Ling Xiao understood that the only woman among a woman and a man was usually in a low-status situation. Now how many women with knowledge and ideals are willing to become co-wives? For example, a large financial group
Will the female heir be willing to become a co-wife?
As long as you use your brain, you will know that this is impossible. Sharing a wife is more like an inflatable baby. It is basically to relieve the desire of men. The biggest possibility is that she becomes a fertility machine, constantly
The earth gives birth to life.
Ling Xiao asked herself, she would never let herself end up in this situation, a woman and a man? She didn't have the consciousness to sacrifice herself to save the bachelor. She felt goosebumps all over her body when she thought of this possibility.
Horrifying. This is clearly the status of women being lowered once again. Anyone who wants to support this idea should get out!
So when I look at Ling Xiao, I feel that the argument that advocates female compatriots marrying n husbands is nonsense. Reality is not a novel. Reality is often crueler than novels, and you can't mess with it arbitrarily.
Maybe some people don't agree with Ling Xiao's idea, and think that the life of co-wives is like what is described in some novels. Several men love the female pig's feet miserably, and no one can leave her (this is purely prank, whoever leaves is the one who leaves her)
can live), accept the situation of sharing wives, each of the men has assigned their own situation, some are dedicated to accompany the heroine, and some are mainly responsible for making money. It seems that the heroine lives a happy life.
But Ling Xiao felt that what was written was too false. After giving out one's emotions, would one ask for something in return? They should. But how can a woman repay the love of n men by herself?
Love is not like a big pie that can be distributed arbitrarily and everyone can be guaranteed to get the same portion. Love is elusive and should not be measured. So women think they give equal love, but n men do not.
Moreover, people’s hearts are biased, and over time it becomes a problem.
There are also people who naturally think of themselves first. For example, if a female pig trotter gets pregnant and gives birth to one of the men's children, will other men ask the woman to have another child of their own?
Yes! I believe that most men have this idea. It is also natural. Once it cannot be achieved, will there be trouble? Maybe in the novel, men will not care, but in reality this will not be the case. N men will naturally ask their wives to have children.
A child of one's own. Someone can't have multiple children without having one. So this means that women are reduced to fertility machines.
And after years of education, there are a few female compatriots who are willing to endure all the discomforts, discomforts, and pains during pregnancy again and again. They are still unable to go to work, have no salary, and have to rely on the mercy of their husbands for everything.
, whatever you want to eat, you have to wait for your husband to give it to the family.
Just imagining it makes many women give up the so-called fantasy of one woman and n men, and after getting married, they will most likely feel that it is important to have a child of their own. So when a woman marries n men, men will inevitably let women
Give birth one by one. As for female compatriots who are sick and want to have endless births, the idea of one woman marrying n men can be put to rest.
In addition, even in modern society, giving birth to children again and again will greatly damage women's health. Some people die during childbirth. After giving birth to a child, they will be even more tired and have to breastfeed the child, which will inevitably affect the future of women.
work, and eventually had to give up my job completely.
You have to give up. Who wants to work with a woman who often takes time off to prepare for the birth of a child? There are many taboos during pregnancy. As a partner, you can only do many things by yourself. The credit must be divided equally. I believe no one will be willing.
As a result, female compatriots will have fewer opportunities to go out to work, and may even lead to some companies directly rejecting women's employment. It is strongly recommended that women just get married, have children and raise children. This will inevitably arouse the dissatisfaction of other female compatriots who want to work.
Anger has led to the division of the female camp. Once a woman in a one-woman-n-man group asks for help, will the women in other camps simply pretend not to see it? Do you think they are asking for it?
If she is unable to work in a company, is it possible for that female compatriot to create her own career? Impossible! Because the responsibilities she has to bear are too heavy. Having a child is not the end, but rather the beginning.
As a mother, you have to clean up the house and cook for the family. It seems that the housework does not have any technical content, but it has that endless quality. You may even be very tired from doing it, but you don’t feel that you have made any big progress.
, as if nothing was done.
For example, after giving birth to a child, it is impossible to completely throw it aside and grow up without caring about anything. This is impossible. The child must be fed and drank, given a place to sleep, and trained to grow up.
If you don't have time to take care of your children, it's actually the same as not having a child. It would be better not to have a child. Many children die in infancy. There is still some affection that needs to be cultivated for each other. Even the closest parents and children still need to cultivate their affection, otherwise the children will grow older.
I will never have any relationship with my parents in the future.
Of course, as soon as the argument put forward by a certain expert comes out, there are many people who think the same as Ling Xiao, many female compatriots have opposing opinions, some are vomiting sweet things, and many others send their regards to that person's family.
Ling Xiao will not greet his female family members, because they are them, and it is impossible for him to say such things. Why should his family members have to bear the consequences of his words? In her opinion, who did what happened?
Who should be held responsible for the consequences?
I believe that not only female compatriots do not want this idea, but also many male compatriots will not agree. This is because they see it from a long-term perspective. In Ling Xiao's view, the so-called one woman n men is somewhat anti-human. If you look at it from another gender, it is
One man and one woman.
Ling Xiao imagined for a moment that there was a woman who got pregnant and gave birth to her own child, but refused to let other women give birth to her child. She also kept saying that the child I gave birth to was your child. Let's see how many stupid women are willing. Can it be the same?
Of course it's different. The blood connection will put the mother and the child on the same side from the beginning (except for a few women, who don't even know their children are on the same side as themselves, and don't know how)
No matter how good other women are to the child, there is still some estrangement. If they do something wrong, if the mother beats and scolds the child and tells the child that he has done something wrong, the mother and the child will soon forgive each other.
But if it is not your own child, but a child born to someone else, and that child has done something wrong, then if it were a so-called aunt who beats, scolds, and scolds the child, the child will definitely write down in the notebook: a certain year
On a certain day of a certain month, I was beaten and scolded because of sex. I wrote it down.
It's okay to do it once or twice. Over time, you will gradually forget some minor problems. But if it continues like this, even if someone has a good intention but has a problem with the means, or there is no problem with the means but is too hasty when executing, it will cause
The big problem may be the relationship between enemies.
It can be seen from this that it is human nature to want a child of one's own. Who would be willing to ride around behind a horse if it is not his own child? He works like a cow or a horse to do things for his children, but he is rejected by his children because of his nagging and rebelliousness. Even his own children have them, let alone his own children.
The so-called mother-child relationship without blood relationship.
Most people are more concerned about blood relatives. Between their adoptive mother and their biological mother, most people will favor their biological mother. What's more, the kind of woman who competes with her biological mother for her father's favor should die!