1147 The lips are dead and the teeth are cold, fight back!
Pure text online reading domain name of this website
For synchronized reading on your mobile phone, please visit
At the Footballer of the Year award ceremony at the end of 2005, Blatter also presented another award created by himself: the President's Special Award.
It is awarded to those who have made special contributions to world football during the year.
This year, the award goes to a man who is no stranger to Chelsea.
Swedish referee Frisk.
This referee was the one who officiated the match between Chelsea and Barcelona in the Champions League last season and was criticized by Mourinho after the game for violating the rules by meeting with Barcelona coach Frank Rijkaard during halftime.
, accusations that may affect the fairness of the game!
This matter caused quite a stir last season, that is, in the first half of this year. Frisk even received death threats and was forced to announce his retirement from the refereeing world.
Not long after, Blatter awarded this special award to Frisk. The outside world seemed to express comfort, but it also meant that Frisk was a victim.
He also made remarks about Chelsea: "If a team is only allowed to have 5 foreigners among the 11 starters, then they will focus on the establishment of the youth training system. FIFA is considering such an issue and limiting the number of foreign players."
This is one way. If Chelsea are only allowed to have five foreign players, then Abramovich will not go all over the world to buy the best players and disrupt the market balance. What is currently happening at Chelsea should not happen at all.
This leads to chaos and disorder."
Although Blatter pointed his finger at Chelsea, the outside world still believed that Millwall, who carried the banner of the Premier League and established a dominant dynasty in Europe, was also criticized!
Why?
Take a look at Millwall's starting lineup and even their first team.
How many English players are there?
Almost invisible!
But Blatter would never dare to accuse Millwall openly!
Because the focus of his explanation is the cultivation of the youth training system.
Millwall is the most outstanding representative of youth training in Europe and even the world.
UEFA does not dare to make an issue against Millwall on this point.
According to UEFA's current rules, Millwall has the largest number of youth training applicants to participate in the Champions League every season among the giants!
Local training has nothing to do with the nationality of the players.
Just like starting from two seasons later, if Arsenal participates in the European war, Cesc Fabregas will be labeled as Arsenal's youth training and has nothing to do with Barcelona or Spain. This will be clearly marked in the records on UEFA's official website
.
Just like Millwall's Ronaldinho, Cristiano Ronaldo, Villa, Alonso, De Rossi and other players, they all clearly indicate on the UEFA official website: Millwall Youth Training!
Blatter dares to point out this point and criticize Millwall. It is tantamount to going against UEFA and even the European Union, which is setting himself up for trouble.
After Aldridge led the team back to London, he still made this topic clear.
In the eyes of outsiders, he was unusually standing up for his arch-rival Chelsea.
Millwall during their campaign in the Club World Cup.
The 17th round of the Premier League continues as usual. Arsenal's league performance this season is very poor. The performance in the strong dialogue is also disappointing, especially the home game was massacred by Millwall, which made Wenger sigh with regret when he returned from his dream at midnight, so in Heb.
When Chelsea welcomed Chelsea, Wenger didn't have any shame and played a conservative game against Chelsea. Now some fans have called for Wenger to be dismissed. In order to keep his position as coach, he had to bow his head for the sake of his record.
Although Chelsea temporarily returned to the top of the standings after scoring 1 point at Highbury, Millwall had a game less.
Before returning to England to prepare for the make-up match against Birmingham City, Aldridge attended a press conference.
In response to Blatter's comments criticizing the Premier League and specifically criticizing Chelsea, he expressed his own views.
"One of FIFA's responsibilities is to promote the development of football. Mr. President said that Chelsea is not doing well. I will not express my opinion. I just want to express my position. Take the players in the Millwall team as an example, Billy
Ya lived in a difficult environment when he was a child. Millwall brought him to London and asked him to accept
The best football training. Imagine if we didn't do this, Villa's growing environment would be different, and the quality of training he received would definitely not be up to the level in London. This is the reality. The material gap is very big.
Intuitively, there is a very obvious effect gap on players’ growth in a system.”
In fact, both UEFA and FIFA have introduced some policies to restrict the transfer of young players in recent years. One of the purposes is to prevent clubs like Millwall from prematurely poaching talent resources belonging to other clubs.
Walk.
Therefore, Millwall has followed the rules over the years and will not forcefully poach any young talents. If they can negotiate with the club, then everyone will talk according to the rules. If they cannot reach an agreement, the transaction will not be done in a righteous way, and there will be no dirty tricks behind the scenes.
A means of poaching people.
But from Aldridge's point of view, he does not particularly agree with FIFA and UEFA's approach.
Like in the future, Chelsea will be fined, and Barcelona will also be fined. The reasons for being fined are not the same. Chelsea is targeted because the reason for punishing Chelsea is illegal operations during the signing process.
This is worth debating, because agents in the football circle all know it tacitly: almost no club will make signings in accordance with the rules, and everyone will use some side tactics to promote player transfers!
Of course, a club that follows the rules like Millwall is really an endangered species nowadays.
This is naturally related to the fact that Millwall had a dispute with Ajax and almost went to court. Aldridge just didn't want to deal with such a troublesome matter. It was not cost-effective to lose a big deal in a small way and distract his energy.
But almost all other clubs have various violations in transfer operations.
But it happened that only Chelsea was fined, and this was targeted!
If Barcelona is fined in the future, it will be illegal recruitment and has little to do with the recruitment process.
They have introduced players who are prohibited from signing by FIFA. For example, U18 players cannot make international transfers.
From the club's perspective, of course, we will protect our own talent resources at all costs.
But what if you put yourself in the player’s shoes?
Is it better for South Korea's "Messi" or Japan's "Messi" to receive training from a young age in Asia, or is it more conducive to becoming a talent if he receives training at La Masia at a young age?
Players themselves should also have the right to choose!
This is about the players’ own future! Their own life!
Just like parents of young children will do everything possible to get their children to go to prestigious schools, if the government introduces a policy that a child can only choose schools within the local area, and is not allowed to go abroad, or even choose schools across provinces and cities, how much dissatisfaction will this cause?
It makes no sense that those who have no conditions or capital can choose local schools and those who have opportunities and capital cannot send their children to a better environment to cultivate talents.
When it comes to Millwall, Aldridge doesn't particularly care whether Millwall's lineup has players with English nationality. After all, the background of East London is a gathering place for immigrants. A considerable number of Millwall's fans are descendants of immigrants.
, coupled with the fact that they are now an international team and their marketing goals are global, foreign fans who care about how many English players there are in Millwall?
But FIFA really needs to push forward the implementation of the foreign aid system in the Premier League step by step, and may even cancel the nationality-unrestricted policy of locally trained players. In that case, it will be very detrimental to Millwall's future development.
Aldrich did not have absolute confidence in this matter.
Despite the history he has experienced, the development of the Premier League has not changed.
But in the life he is going through now, many changes have taken place in European football. Policy changes are one of them, and they even include changes in other continents. Perhaps this is the butterfly effect. For example, Brazil introduced the transfer age for domestic players earlier.
Restrictions, such as UEFA's earlier introduction of age limits for players' international transfers.
Although Millwall and Chelsea are mortal enemies.
But when it comes to his stance against UEFA and FIFA, Aldridge's attitude is very firm.
No matter how Millwall and Chelsea fight behind closed doors, it is a family matter in the Premier League.
It doesn't matter if you break up.
But when the door opens to external pressure, as the two most watched teams in the Premier League at this time, their relationship with each other can be described as bitter!
Now I sit back and watch the show, maybe in the future after Chelsea is punished, it will be Millwall's turn to be targeted, and Millwall may even be shot before Chelsea!
After making some remarks in defense of Chelsea, a reporter from the Guardian in Fleet Street brought the topic to the just-concluded Club World Cup.
"Sir Hall, in the questionnaire survey conducted by this newspaper, 49% of the fans chose the answer 'yes' to the question: Is the Club World Cup a waste of time? Do you think this shows that the Club World Cup is in the hearts of fans?
Low status?"
Aldridge smiled lightly and said: "I won't comment. Anyway, I think at least if you ask fans: Is the World Cup a waste of time, the number of fans who will choose the answer 'yes' will definitely not exceed 1%. If it does exceed, it means that
Most of the fans who responded to the survey said that the national team they supported did not enter the World Cup. Oh, if the World Cup was changed to every two years, it would be hard to say."
There was a burst of laughter.
Fleet Street reporters gave Aldridge a tacit look of admiration.
In a word, the news is here again.
Aldrich is hitting back at Blatter!
Blatter is not only keen on using the Club World Cup to make money, he is also pushing for ridiculous proposals such as "holding the World Cup every two years".
The "Guardian" reporter continued to ask: "The Club World Cup reflects the disparity between rich and poor in world football. Millwall's player value, player salary expenditure, player lineup composition, etc. are all different from those of participating teams in the same period."
Huge gap, even surpassing the opponent several times, dozens of times, hundreds of times, such a useless game,
Millwall traveled thousands of miles to compete, but the main players spent a lot of energy in the final. Now they have to return to the Premier League to participate in make-up games, and there is a difficult schedule ahead. Don't you consider these? Or, although,
Fans think the Club World Cup is a waste of time, but you care more about this championship trophy?"
