typeface
large
in
Small
Turn off the lights
Previous bookshelf directory Bookmark Next

Post a single chapter to complain.

This book has reached 1.5 million words. Along the way, many book friends have put forward various opinions and opinions. Some of them I think are very pertinent, and some of them I really think are unreasonable.

Some book friends complain about Shuwen, complaining about the use of words such as "extreme" and "self-made" too frequently. These are real problems, and I will never deny them. I have said it before, part-time codewriter

Under the circumstances, it is difficult for me to simplify the text, and there are many unnecessary explanations. Sometimes I can’t bear the ancient power in my body and always want to write it out. Sometimes I really ignore it and write some explanations repeatedly. Of course,

This is not to excuse yourself, but to truly admit your mistakes.

There are too many explanations and some words are used too frequently. I don’t dare to promise that I will definitely change them, but I will try my best to make corrections so as not to bore readers too much. This is the limit of a part-time code writer.

.

In my opinion, the above views and opinions are still correct and reasonable.

The following part can even be said to be outrageous to me based on the opinions of more than a dozen book friends.

The first is the issue of address. I don’t know whether you are 100% seeking our Chinese style of dialogue, or whether you simply don’t understand the address etiquette in Japanese culture.

I have already explained it before, Jun, San, Jiang and the like are commonly used suffixes in Japanese culture.

Jiang basically translates to "little", such as "black soil sauce", which translates to "little black soil" and is often used as a suffix for elders to address younger generations.

"Jun" is a common title. Friends who often watch Japanese comics and dramas should understand that among classmates and colleagues, it is very common to call them "Jun" in Japan. They are called by their first names in Japan.

Either the relationship is very close, or the relationship is very distant or even bad.

Otherwise, the word "Jun" will usually be used.

And "Sang" is a pure honorific. In school, juniors and juniors should use "Sang" to address their seniors and seniors. In the company, those with junior qualifications and lower positions should use "Sang" to address those with more seniority and higher positions.

'Sang', if you call me by your first name, it will be regarded as provocative by others, which is an impolite behavior!

So those book friends complained and even criticized me for using the word "mulberry" just to deliberately reduce the word count. I didn't know what to say. Isn't this a normal term? Take Jiang Si and Huang Tu as examples.

Although there is an age difference of ten years, Shoji calls Huang Tu by his first name. Are you sure this is not an arrogant and provocative act?

Hydrology, I definitely have problems with improper wording, or using words too frequently, which can cause aesthetic fatigue. If you want to criticize and complain, it is also a problem mentioned by the book friends above. Take these

To make an article about "suffixed title", I can really only say that you, book friend, know too little about Japanese comic culture.

Of course, some book friends may say, you are writing a Chinese online novel, and it is aimed at Chinese readers. Why do you have to use some Japanese titles? Isn’t it better to directly Chineseize it?

To be honest, if I were to include some Chinese conversational terms in the article, I would be criticized by another group of readers.

The second question is actually the question of combat effectiveness that is most often mentioned in this book, or even in all Naruto fan fiction!

I think some book friends have a very strange view. In their view, as long as the protagonist is stronger than his opponent, he will never lose. Yes, this is the view of these book friends.

They will not consider any rationality. In their view, the stronger should win. Why should they lose?

But I really want to ask these book friends, when you are playing a game and your level and equipment are behind, do you just choose to surrender? Have you never played a comeback game?

Shouldn't it?

Of course, I will definitely not write that the protagonist really loses to an opponent weaker than him, but what I don’t understand is that as long as it is mentioned in the article that XX has a certain probability of defeating the protagonist, or even killing the protagonist, at least one or

Two book friends jumped out and said, 'You are unreasonable!' 'You are not good at this!'

'The protagonist is so strong, how can he lose?'

I haven't even written about the protagonist's defeat. If I did, wouldn't it mean that I would be trolled all over the screen?

Just like a question raised by a book friend I replied to in this chapter today, do you think it is possible for a child to kill an adult while holding a sword?

Note that I didn't say it would definitely kill him, I asked if there was a probability.

The answer is obvious, even if the probability is as low as one percent, or even one thousandth, if there is a probability, it is a probability, right?

For another example, if you are playing LOL, if someone says that level 1 Dolan Sword or Straw Sandals can defeat a level 18 opponent with full divine equipment, that is definitely a joke. If you stand on the opposite side and let you fight, you may not be able to defeat it.

Defend.

But if you have a level 10 two-piece set and beat someone else's level 11 three-piece set, even if the equipment and level are obviously behind, they still have a level two ultimate move. If you only have a level one ultimate move, there is still room for maneuver.

?

Let me tell you, you have a probability of winning. Isn’t that an exaggeration?

not to mention.

If book friends ask me to write the book strictly according to the original settings, I'm sorry, the collapse of combat power is the standard feature of the original work. For example, the famous Hatake is 50-50, and he will be half dead no matter how hard he fights, and then unexpectedly

Can I fight against Kaguya Otsutsuki?

And then Sakura, who may not be a Kage-level person, can actually participate in the final battle.

Isn't this the biggest combat effectiveness BUG problem?

In terms of combat power, to be honest, I have tried my best to allocate it reasonably so that the logic is not so exaggerated. For example, Sakura and Kakashi can participate in the decisive battle instead of being slaughtered by Kaguya with one hand.

I tried my best to come up with a reason why I could take advantage of Kaguya because she had 0 combat experience.

Really, book lovers, in Naruto fandom, if you are obsessed with the issue of combat effectiveness, you are really going too far. Among the major migrant manga in Japan, Naruto is the hot-blooded manga with the most bugs.

Not just this book, but also other novels written by Naruto fans.

My personal opinion is true, as long as the author doesn't write that the protagonist's Kage level strength is 50-50 equal to that of an ordinary Chuunin, and that at Super Kage level, it would still take a lot of effort to defeat an ordinary Jounin.

Come on, it’s actually reasonable!

The above is my review of the book in Code Words, and I made a small complaint after talking about the chapters. I also express my gratitude to the book friends who can understand it. If you can't understand it, there is nothing you can do about it. I won't do anything about similar problems in the future.

Will continue to reply.

I can’t waste my lunch break. I haven’t even slept yet. I have to write more words. Some book friends have been asking for more updates before. I also expressed my sincerity. On Children’s Day, I will write more words to show my sincerity.

!

Thank you all book friends for your continued support!


This chapter has been completed!
Previous Bookshelf directory Bookmark Next