Liu Zheng has also been thinking about this issue.
Because if the feudal kings redistribute their territories, this will be the first problem they will face.
This is also the biggest problem that Long Yan will face after the restructuring.
In this era, Liu Zheng has never positioned himself as a ruler. He wants to be a leader, an all-round leader. Whether it is economic, military, political, or social. The role he hopes to play,
He is such a person. So in the beginning, he liked to do many things by himself. Gradually, he was only responsible for giving guidance, so that the development of Liangzhou could enter an advanced track.
At this time, he also had the same thoughts about Long Yan.
It is not easy to govern such a large country. Policies in all fields must be kept up.
Social, economic, legal construction, moral construction, institutional construction, military construction, etc., there are too many.
The first thing to bear the brunt is the serious contradiction between social production relations and productivity.
At least for the current Long Yan, this is the case.
Why did he emphasize the redistribution of territory to Xie Tianyao before? Because the enfeoffment system of Long Yan at this time is too backward compared to the current economic development of Long Yan. It is so backward that Liu Zheng would almost think that it is primitive.
This is the system that society should have.
Britain is also in the midst of the Industrial Revolution, but their cavalry system has begun to change. The emergence of the squire is a compromise of the entire British society to capital.
What about Dragon Flame?
Under this full contradiction, some compromises must also be made.
This is the compromise he needs from the old nobleman.
The way to balance.
The new aristocrats have to make compromises, Zhu Zhen has to make compromises, and he himself has to make compromises, and similarly, the old aristocrats should also make compromises.
and.
The compromise of the old aristocrats is even more crucial, because it is the reform of the entire society and production relations.
certainly.
Liu Zheng also has his own thoughts on public ownership or private ownership.
The history of many countries in the past has also proved that these two systems should complement each other. It is not advisable to pursue one of them to the extreme. In his personal opinion, public ownership has its own merits for a period of time.
It is advanced. Because the means of production in the public ownership system are shared, exploitation can be greatly reduced. The equal distribution of production tools will allow everyone to work together, use their energy together, and produce their strength together.
but.
With the emergence of new production tools, the development of productivity has been promoted and individual labor has become possible, thus causing this primitive public ownership to give way to private ownership.
Then look back at private ownership. Private ownership is one of the basic signs of an efficient economic society.
The development of productive forces is the reason for the emergence of private ownership.
If you analyze it carefully, public ownership is essentially one entity with the country. This is the biggest advantage of public ownership and also the biggest problem. Stable guarantee and profit are not the primary goals, so it is naturally conservative and lacks vitality. The advantage of private ownership is that it is responsible for its own profits and losses.
Therefore, there is always motivation, but the attribute of pursuing advantages and avoiding disadvantages makes them use every means to escape when they assume social responsibilities. It is common for wealthy families to freeze to death on the road of drunkenness and meat.
so.
At this time, theory is no longer a matter of one person, or a few people, a noble, or a group of nobles.
Even simply taking one country as an example is no longer enough.
This is a social problem. This is a social axiom problem. Society is an ordered structure, and this orderliness relies on the exchange of matter and energy. Society tends to become more and more orderly, which means,
The capture of material and energy is bound to become larger and larger. And this accumulation and circulation of wealth and energy constitute positive and negative feedback in society.
Liu Zheng thinks so.
First, positive feedback is higher than negative feedback, that is, the speed of wealth accumulation is greater than the speed of circulation, which will lead to a widening gap between the rich and the poor in society, with a small number of people occupying a large amount of capital, while the majority of people do not occupy capital.
Second, positive feedback equals negative feedback, and only then will society tend to a stable state.