Jiang Mingzhu and Yu Xuexian were discussing this matter after leaving. Jiang Mingzhu had the same idea as Teacher Lu, thinking that the junior sister might be discriminated against by a foreign reviewer.
The reason why she asked immediately when they met was because He Xiangyu had said that he would pass quickly, but the result had not come out yet, which made people puzzled.
Jiang Mingzhu advocated: "She should have given her opinion to the editor-in-chief and complained that the reviewer had a problem."
Internationally renowned journals carry a reputation, and the editor-in-chief is a relatively fair academic person.
Yu Xuexian lifted his glasses with his fingers, looking much calmer than his younger wife.
Things are not that simple. If a complaint can solve the problem, why should Director Fang emphasize the need to build a good domestic platform?
What is academic publishing called?
Seize intellectual patent rights.
Think about it, if the research topic of the article you published happened to be similar or similar to someone else's, that person happened to be the reviewer. You said that the reviewer saw that his research results had not yet been published and was first reviewed by you.
If you take one step and don't lose your mentality, can you pass the test smoothly?
Student Xie’s thesis questions mainly focused on the fact that he successfully passed the test without any doubts from the big boss in China. Don’t say here that everyone in the country has to look at the face of Cao Yudong, the big boss. This is impossible. Cao Yudong himself has competitors. Don’t blame Teacher Lu for doubting
Some people abroad wear colored glasses with ulterior motives.
Of course, you can never say that all the reviewers who ask you to revise your manuscript are bad reviewers. How can you tell whether the reviewers have good intentions or evil intentions?
International academic competition has more talents and is undoubtedly far more intense and cruel than within a single country.
I don’t reject you directly. Rejecting you directly may make you submit elsewhere. It is best to let you revise your manuscript frequently once, twice or three times. This is why the review time of some manuscripts is incredibly long.
The most common way is: drag you to death.
As long as there is a conflict of interests, it is impossible for peer reviewers not to secretly plot against you. People with high IQs are much more insidious about how to plot against you. For reference, Zhou Ruomei is extremely insidious about plotting against her own relatives. She is just a shrimp with low IQ.
If you can't study it yourself, you can get a chance to learn from other people's shared results.
This is what happened to classmate Xie.
It can be said that the world of scholars with high IQs is never pure. On the contrary, there is a mystery of "killing" hidden in it. The academic world requires money, and it cannot develop without money, so it must be linked to commercial interests. Business wars are like battlefields, how can academia
Will it be a battlefield?
The good news leaked by Dr. Li Xiaoshen is correct. The first three times she reviewed the manuscript for the international platform, it was passed as quickly as the domestic one, which makes people speculate that her manuscript can be published soon. In the end, she was stuck in the hands of the fourth reviewer.
It can be seen that once you are unlucky enough to encounter this kind of problem during the submission process, the situation will be far more complicated than you think.
Don't say stupid things like scholars have no national boundaries. That's just to fool young people who don't understand society. There are many scheming people in the world who are eager to use such nonsense to let some stupid scholars who dream of academic purity share their results.
This fourth reviewer kept catching grammatical errors in her paper.
It is once again confirmed that Director Fang’s words are reasonable. When the domestic platform becomes stronger, it can take another needed advantage: the language system.
The academic barriers and academic pitfalls of different language systems are also difficult for laypeople to imagine.
If the reviewer really catches her for grammatical errors, forget it. No, they are trying to make her change the key academic information of the paper and the logical structure of her own paper by picking on the grammatical errors.
