"It's just a very preliminary study." Shi Xu told everyone on behalf of Teacher Tan that there is no need to be surprised or overly behaved about this matter. Teacher Tan's disciples do not engage in exaggerated academics and practice medicine step by step with the spirit of seeking truth from facts.
"We just want to know if there are any results?" Gao Zhaocheng wanted to scold you teachers and students not to perform Versailles again at this critical moment.
Asked if there was any result? Shi Xuyu gave the other party a roll of his eyes. You can tell this by looking at the expressions of the medical journal editors at the scene.
The group of journal editors sitting in the front row continued their heated discussion, talking about the fact that a manuscript signed by Dr.
,Journal of the Non-M Medical Society Human Nature and Health..
It is really 100% impossible to submit one draft to multiple submissions.
The two manuscripts are completely different even in the type of specialty!
Didn’t you say there is no more?
The editor of Human Nature and Health directly gave the answer: Didn't you hear what those people in the back row were talking about? It must be a general surgeon.
Sulima made a very angry voice and asked the editor of Human Nature and Health: Do you think her article is credible?
This is another major feature of scientific journals. The larger the platform, the more it strives to pursue the latest things. In this way, it can show that its technical information channels are the world's leading and win the title of leading human science and technology.
Whether your manuscript passes the test or not, the first important factor is not how well your experimental project is done, but whether the idea of your laboratory project is the latest technology. No matter how good your experimental project is, it belongs to many people.
The editors of major journals will disdain such shabby projects for technical research. On the contrary, if the project topic is something that the editor has never seen before, the editor will be overjoyed and open his extraordinary eyes to the most innovative manuscripts.
Tolerance.
It was as if the two of them were continuing to question whether the other had submitted more than one draft.
Wilson's eyes were only glazed with the aftermath of shock, and this fact made him feel a little dizzy.
Sulima's expression suddenly changed.
Wilson grabbed his colleague and asked vigorously: What is the major of the manuscript she submitted to you?
Trying to block Dr. Xie by prohibiting multiple submissions per draft is obviously overestimating his own capabilities and shooting himself in the foot.
It can be seen that Xie’s manuscript was quickly approved in domestic journals, definitely not because the journal leaders sold her the face of a big boss mentor, but more because of her unprecedented innovation.
Every year, there are many scholars who try to publish papers in the name of her mentor Cao Yudong, but not all of them may pass smoothly.
Foreign editors and reviewers who are fair-minded will do the same thing. The reason why she passed the three trials quickly is also based on this principle. After understanding this, Sulima’s doubts became very weak among her peers.
.
First of all, everyone will first consider your identity as a reviewer. You are in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and not General Surgery. How can you question a manuscript written by an author from a different specialty?
Furthermore, the first author of this manuscript is two people, one of whom is general surgery guru Tan Kelin himself. Experts like Tan Kelin enjoy a certain reputation both at home and abroad, and they have many papers and scientific research achievements. He
There is absolutely no need to risk your own reputation by doing anything academically dishonest just to see if a paper can be published internationally.