Xie Wanying wanted to first listen to what the foreign editor-in-chief teacher opposite said.
It is impossible for the editor-in-chief to say that just to make a phone call to compliment her on how well the surgery went.
For such a busy person, a congratulatory phone call must have interests in mind.
When Wilson spoke to the other side, he could clearly feel that her intelligence and transparency seemed to have seen through him. He was secretly shocked and deeply regretted for this.
Her calm and outstanding temperament is enough to make people look at her. She should not be treated as an ordinary young doctor. If he had known this, Wilson thought, he should have written an email to communicate with her personally or like
In this way, if you call and communicate in advance, you will not be fooled by others and fall into traps.
If you do something wrong and regret it, correct it quickly. If you don’t correct it, others will steal the manuscript. Wilson made a decision immediately.
So Xie Wanying heard the editor-in-chief personally promise her that her paper would be included in the latest issue of the academic journal and then published.
Xie Wanying must ask: Has the fourth trial passed?
It had not been reviewed before, so she was asked to revise it.
Wilson conveyed Sulima's words to her: As long as she logs into the electronic account of the submission system (this account is usually owned by the corresponding author and is the mentor), she will find that after the surgery demonstration just now, Sulima will review her manuscript immediately.
After passing the paper, a notification will be sent to her in the system that the paper has been officially approved. This is equivalent to saying that she does not need to revise the paper anymore.
And Sulima planned to invite her to visit his university laboratory.
Wilson conveyed the sincerity of the invitation to her on behalf of the other party.
It was obvious that Mr. Sulima felt guilty and embarrassed after being slapped in the face, and did not dare to extend the invitation to her face to face.
Which university laboratory did Mr. Sulima come from? The person who could make Editor-in-Chief Wilson respect him with three degrees of courtesy and respect must not be an ordinary professional boss.
First let’s talk about the review process of academic journals. As mentioned before, the peer review after the initial review can be said to be a review by the big guys in the industry. There are usually three mainstream methods of peer review: one is public review,
The author's name and the reviewer are disclosed to each other. This corresponds to single-blind and double-blind review. Double-blind is easy to understand. It means that the identity information of the reviewer and the author is concealed from each other. Single-blind review can be as it is now.
People can know the author's information, but she does not know the reviewer's identity information.
Apart from the editor-in-chief, the only people who can know the reviewer’s information are the corresponding authors who are responsible for external liaison (now I finally understand what the corresponding author means). The corresponding authors of her paper are Mr. Zhang and Mr. Cao Yudong. So Mr. Zhang knows the reviewer.
The writer was able to invite people to watch her surgery performance.
Now that the review is complete, the single-blind person can reveal the answer.
Wilson formally introduced to her which university laboratory Professor Sulima came from.
After Xie Wanying heard the other party's identity, she immediately understood why the other party could "trip up" her hard.
What is the predecessor of surgical robot? It is CAS, which is called computer-assisted surgery.
As can be seen from the name, the focus of the research at the beginning was computers rather than robots. The research technology area focused on was the concept and method of using computer technology to assist preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation surgical treatment.
Later, with the integration and progress of industrial design, the application scenarios of surgical robots showed that robots took the main role in surgery instead of computers. Therefore, the status of computers declined relatively, until later computers were simply removed from the technical name.
