As soon as these three policy questions came out, Bai Gui glanced around the field and found that many candidates were secretly complaining, but there were still some candidates who showed confidence and answered as soon as they picked up their pens.
Looking around, he found that among the candidates who he felt were in good condition, five or six of them were classmates he had met in the Normal School. It seemed that they had the same connections as him and had entered the Normal School.
Others are studying in other institutions of higher learning.
As for those who complain, naturally they have no way out and can only study hard in the countryside.
It looks like the same test paper, but as soon as you enter the venue, people are divided into different grades.
These test questions are somewhat related to the questions in the normal school exams a few days ago. They are not in depth, but by drawing parallels and reading a few more current articles, I can probably get a rough idea of how to answer them.
This exam question is considered reasonable. I heard that there are also people writing policy questions on the opening of the Suez Canal and so on...
"Of these three policy questions, the first two are not very difficult. The first question can be answered by just reading more foreign historical materials, and the second question analyzes agriculture, which was discussed in Shiwu Zhai's Agricultural Science, and I also
I have studied it carefully, and as for the third question..."
"Those who have recorded demerits have no difficulty in taking the exam, but those who have not recorded demerits are left to their own devices and will inevitably fall behind..."
Bai Gui briefly analyzed the three policy issues. After all, it is a government examination. The second difficulty in testing a scholar is not a major examination such as the provincial examination, the general examination, or the palace examination. It cannot be compared to the level of solving problems for the country. They are not yet children.
Only those who have passed the government examination are considered a child, and they are not qualified to provide advice and suggestions for the country. These three policy questions are actually the test of erudition and memorization ability.
Of course, if you have not practiced eight-legged essay and are not familiar with some rhyme and rhyme techniques, even if you can answer the three policy questions, the essay will be dry and boring to read. The examiner will not admit such a candidate.
After pondering for a while, he had an idea in his mind. He raised his pen and wrote on the scroll, "There is a saying from Western Confucianism: 'When two equals meet, public law is power; when two equals meet, power is public law.' I recite his words every time.
Sadly, the sincerity of public law cannot be relied upon, and relying on public law is just an excuse for the powerful."
He first determined the nature of a policy question, which is the argumentative argument of the policy question.
The best policy papers are those where the arguments come from the mouths of sages. In previous generations of college entrance examination education, Chinese teachers had already taught them.
In fact, the Western Confucian view of this sentence is derived from Rousseau's theory of equality and Spencer's theory of evolution. At this time, there were two theories in the academic world, one was the egalitarian school, which respected Rousseau's "On the Civil Covenant".
”, and the other is called the powerful school, which is Spencer’s “Evolution”.
And who is the person who refined this point of view?
It was Liang Rengong who wrote in "On Similarities and Differences in the Changes of National Thoughts" in 1901, seven years ago: "When two equals meet, there is no need for power, and reason is power; when two equals meet, there is no need for reason, and power is reason."
The Reform Movement is a reform movement, and it is not a sullen thing to say. Now that Emperor Guangxu and the Queen Mother of the West have passed away, this sentence has nothing to do with the current situation.
Besides, he also changed his original words.
Can plagiarism by scholars be called plagiarism? This is called borrowing Liang Rengong’s views!
There are countless references like this, and the streets are full of theoretical expositions of Rousseau and Spencer.
The meaning of this sentence is also very simple. When two equal countries meet, international law is the greatest power. But when two unequal countries meet, strength is power!
The following is an explanation of this argument: "In the past hundred years, all the countries in Europe and the West have been evenly matched, and there is no one who can enrich himself by barren people. However, in the name of preserving the land, when he suddenly heard about it, he may have had no choice but to pay for it.
No matter what... after all, it doesn't start with righteousness and end with benefit. He is a human being who does what he wants. This is how clever foreign policy is."
Taixi means big and extreme, so Taixi generally refers to Western countries.
The meaning of this sentence is that on Europa, all countries are evenly matched and cannot kill any country, but it consumes too much money and food, so other countries can only make compensation. Over time, this foreign policy practice has been formed...
After writing this paragraph, it is time to cite historical materials.
When it comes to policy questions, the most important thing is to cite evidence to prove that your point of view is correct.
"In the past, when Napoleon wanted to attack the British, the British seized the Danish navy in self-defense, and in order to protect Spain and Portugal, they stationed troops to interfere in their internal affairs. At that time, it was nothing wrong, and it was in compliance with public law. In the end, the British controlled the sea
It is a matter of having full power without resistance."
"The Congress of Vienna was to preserve the situation in Europe. It took what Napoleon destroyed and built it one by one. The name is not unfair, but it is what it is. Russia and Austria divided Poland, Sousson ceded territory to Prussia, and the Netherlands got the Rhine River
Upstream, the general trend of British specialization in the Mediterranean is another thing."
"The Battle of Crimea..."
Soon, historical materials were listed one by one, and the arguments were rigorous.
Bai Gui ended this first policy question with the last sentence: "Oh, protecting the land is based on the fine principles of public law, but it is just a means of extracting profits for others, and it is not expected by public law."
As for the example of the Qing court ceding territory and paying compensation, he would not be taboo.
Adults also need to be proud.
The second policy statement talks about the system of the Zhou Dynasty, which is the most detailed in terms of agricultural management. In recent years of research on agriculture in various countries, most people believe that human management is more important than climate, and the key points are land, capital, and labor.
The correct use of these three resources really requires CNKI knowledge. Now a new academic system has been set up, and agriculture is listed as an independent subject. It is hoped that the academic achievements of agricultural research can be retained. Please describe the methods of agricultural education.
For this kind of policy problem, what effective methods can ordinary scholars come up with?
Just like the answer to the question of later generations, you only need to list the recent agricultural policies. It is best to use other countries' methods and make suggestions, but this should not be too much. It is best to mention one or two points, and don't mention more.
If you write too much, do you think the adults in the court are stupid pigs?
Although the imperial examination was changed to focus on policy questions, it was the same as the previous practice. The first test was the most important. As long as you passed the first test and entered the group case, you could pass the next few exams on your own.
The first question also focuses on the first question. As the name suggests, it is the first question.
Whether you will be dismissed or not depends on how well you write the first question. There are nearly 1,500 people in the government examination. How can the examiner have the time and mood to read each one carefully? They only look at one question and have a general impression.
You can keep it. If you don’t write the first question well, you’ll just drop it.
Bai Gui had already drafted the next two questions, and he had considered and revised them word for word. He would never make any taboos. He was the head of the case and had basically made the admission decision, so he shouldn't make any small mistakes.