typeface
large
in
Small
Turn off the lights
Previous bookshelf directory Bookmark Next

Talk about crowd tactics

I was reading book reviews recently because I opened a copy of "Resist U.S. Aggression and Aid Korea" and a lot of people were talking about the Volunteer Army. When I was collecting information, I also saw a lot of comments about the war decades ago. My thoughts after reading it were -

How many rumors have been circulating during these years when we have been so poor?

Many people think that the Volunteer Army is a tenacious team, a brave but poorly equipped army, but they also believe that the Volunteer Army relies on the "human sea tactics" to win the war. Some people even listed the number of volunteers participating in the battle and

The ratio of the number of U.S. troops participating in the war was N to one, so victory was definitely achieved by relying on more people to defeat fewer people and relying on human lives.

I don’t deny that the Volunteer Army endured great sacrifices in the war, but it can be said that the Volunteer Army can only play the "human sea tactic", and even Koreans don't agree to it. They all jump out and scold you, "You damn don't take me seriously."

People?'

In addition to Koreans, British, Canadians, Australians, French, people from a lot of countries would jump out and scold me, "Don't you fucking treat me as a human being?"

The volunteers are fighting against the United Nations forces led by the United States, not some unknown cats and dogs.

Let's talk about the "Human Sea Tactics". Many people don't understand it and don't think about it. They just follow what others say and listen to the wind. When others say that the Volunteer Army uses "Human Sea Tactics", they just follow suit.

In fact, ever since muskets entered the battlefield, the army's formations have become more and more dispersed. When machine guns and artillery appeared, those who crowded together to charge were all idiots. Otherwise, why would the British develop "water tanks"?

If the Volunteer Army really uses the "Human Sea Tactics", the happiest thing would be to touch Yingjiang. The most indispensable thing is firepower. The overwhelming number of aircraft in the sky, hundreds of artillery on the ground, and the bullets in the machine guns are all as if they are free.

If you spray outwards and kill anyone who dares to attack you, can the volunteers push back from the Yalu River back to the 38th parallel?

The country bumpkin was bullied so hard by the Japanese back then, and he had long understood that intensive charging was suicide. Vice Chairman Lin, who is always healthy, summed up the three-three system. He did not come up with it out of thin air, but summed it up through practice.

When it comes to the "Human Sea Tactics", the one with the most say is actually Japan. Their "Military God" Nogi Nogi Nogi invented the "Pig Rush" tactic, which was truly about using the bodies of soldiers to fight against Tsarist Russia's machine guns.

Mao Zi from Lushun likes this kind of brainless "pig burp" the most. The machine gun shoots sideways and he won't be afraid no matter how many pigs come.

When Japan conquered Port Arthur, they used large-caliber howitzers. In any other country, Nogi Nozomi would have been sued in a military court. However, the Japanese themselves boasted about it and actually promoted the "pig burst" as a perfect tactic that is difficult to defeat in the world. They blew the idiots away.

Became a military god.

The Japanese also had good lives. Before World War II, they encountered the even weaker Chang Gong, and the "Pig Burst" was actually still useful. However, when they encountered the even more powerful Eagle Sauce in World War II, they immediately fell to their knees.

Does anyone criticize Nogi Nogi? Does anyone criticize the "pig attack" tactic? Does anyone ridicule the Japanese red deer for their rigid brains and are all idiots? No!

There are a lot of people who imagine that the volunteers are playing "human sea tactics".

Our own current movie directors are not up to par, and the movies they produce are rubbish. But if you look at the war movies of the last century, there is no director who made such bad scenes. After all, the war was not long over at that time, and people's

The memory is still there.

Today's directors only waste money playing with women.

Just thinking about it makes me angry... (Why don’t I get to play? I’m so angry!)


This chapter has been completed!
Previous Bookshelf directory Bookmark Next