Thanks to the book friends for their support, I will say something here.
I'm just commenting briefly on the shortcomings of this book, such as poor writing, common sense errors, typos, etc., which are all understandable. Thank you for your comments. As for those who are malicious and malicious, I am speechless.
I took a look and found that most of those black books do not subscribe or reward, and they do not even give recommendation votes.
In fact, there are many novels in Qidian. If you like it, you can read it. If you don’t, you can take it off the shelf. It’s difficult to adjust one’s family, and everyone has their own preferences. Many of them are recommended by book friends and are excellent novels. I don’t like to read them either, so they are taken off the shelf.
There are quite a few.
No need to be black!
For those who are black for the sake of being black, I am speechless!
Some people said that I was blaming the First Emperor of Qin, and I was speechless. There was also a book friend who wanted to report me, saying that I was blaming the First Emperor of Qin, and I was also speechless.
I have three attitudes toward book friends. Most book friends will respond to their comments; but those who are ignorant will be too lazy to respond; if they go too far, they will be banned directly.
In my eyes, Qin Shihuang is the only emperor of all time and a peerless emperor. He is very capable and has many shortcomings, but he is definitely not a wise emperor, and many of his actions cannot be called wise.
The greatness of Qin Shihuang is that he is the terminator of the old era, ending an old era. As the king of the old era, he also ended himself at the end of this era.
Among this book, there is a volume called Xian Qin, which tells the story of Qin Shihuang.
In order to write this volume, I investigated a lot of information and came to the conclusion that if an outsider evaluates Qin Shihuang, he must be an emperor, a reformer, a politician, and a military strategist throughout the ages; but insiders hate Qin Shihuang and hate Qin Shihuang.
The closer one is to the era of Qin Shihuang, the lower the evaluation of Qin Shihuang; the further away from the era of Qin Shihuang, the higher the evaluation of Qin Shihuang.
The lower the sense of belonging to the Qin Dynasty, the higher the evaluation of Qin Shihuang; the higher the sense of belonging to the Qin Dynasty, the lower the evaluation of Qin Shihuang.
A sense of involvement is important.
It's like reading a history book and seeing the Battle of Changping, where 400,000 Zhao troops were killed. What I saw were just numbers, not sadness. After all, they were far away from us. But I was born in that era, in the Kingdom of Zhao.
When I heard that 400,000 Zhao soldiers had been killed, including my father and brother, I was extremely angry.
In history, the moment when Qin Shi Huang had the lowest evaluation, he was once tied with Wang Mang and was called Qin Mang!
In fact, there are many realities between Qin Shihuang's Qin Dynasty and Wang Mang's New Dynasty.
When every dynasty falls, there will be many loyal ministers and filial sons, as well as many restorers. The Qing Dynasty perished, leaving many old and young people behind; the Ming Dynasty perished, and Prince Zhu San continued to rebel against the Qing Dynasty and restore the Ming Dynasty; the Tang Dynasty and the Han Dynasty
is also like this.
However, after Wang Mang's new dynasty was defeated in Kunyang, someone immediately raised troops and killed Wang Mang. The new dynasty was destroyed, and there were no restorers. Similarly, after Liu Bang conquered Xianyang, the Qin Dynasty was destroyed, and no one wanted to restore Qin.
He did not die for his country.
Among the novels I have read, "Qin Officials" praises Qin Shihuang, while "Jingchu Empire" criticizes Qin Shihuang. But in both books, there is a cold side of Qin Shihuang, which is unavoidable for both critics and praisers.
of.
Suppose Qin Shihuang dies unexpectedly when he is a hostage in Zhao State, will Qin State rule the world?
Qin will definitely unify the world. This is a historical necessity. Because after the reforms of Qin Xiaogong and the efforts of King Qin Zhao and the efforts of the six generations, the general trend has laid the foundation for unification. No one can stop it. The difference is only a few years earlier.
, or just a few years later.
They over-expand the role of Qin Shihuang and say that without Qin Shihuang, there would be no unification. I am speechless!
There is no doubt that Qin Shihuang was very capable, but he also had many shortcomings.
The strategy he formulated to found the country was based on the illusion that it would last for eternity, but in the end, it collapsed.
It has to be said that the strategy of founding the country formulated by Qin Shihuang was a great failure.
The founding emperors of the past dynasties were all born among common people. Even those born into nobles understood the sufferings of the people. However, Qin Shihuang spent his childhood in the State of Zhao, returned to the country at the age of eight, and ascended the throne at the age of thirteen. His experience was similar to that of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, both of whom were born in the palace.
Among them, women grow up in the hands of women. They don’t understand the sufferings of the people. Many of their policies are aggressive and have many mistakes. Their policies lack flexibility.
But they all inherited huge family fortunes. When Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty came to the throne, the Han Dynasty had gone through three generations of recuperation and its national power had reached its peak. When Qin Shihuang came to the throne, the remaining six generations of Fen also had rich families.
Then, both of them entered the stage of prodigality, which led to the exhaustion of national power, the decline of people's livelihood, and the near-annihilation of the country.
Of course, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was not wrong in his Northern Expedition against the Huns. What was wrong was that he lacked flexibility and was too rigid. Comparing the Eastern Han Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty of the Han Dynasty, when the Han army and the allied forces of the Western Regions attacked the Huns, we feel that Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was very military.
fail.
Similarly, Qin Shihuang made no mistakes when he sent out to conquer the Xiongnu and attacked Nanling. However, he made mistakes in not preparing enough before the war and not grasping the overall situation.
Looking at the experiences of the two people, I thought of the rich second generation - they are not afraid of the rich second generation losing their fortune, but they are afraid of the rich second generation starting their own business.