Rational discussion and exchange of issues about sending money
Regarding the recent chapter, I read the comments and found that there is a lot of controversy.
Before these comments came out, the male protagonist's speech at the press conference at the end of Chapter 755: unrealistic, too ideal, etc., was also expected.
In fact, the content of Chapter 757 has already been described in detail on this kind of issue. Some people may just read the title, or skim the lines, or jump to a chapter without seeing it, and jump to the conclusion directly.
In fact, in reality, cities such as Shenzhen and Hangzhou have various ways to directly distribute money. When discussing this topic in the group, some group members specifically said that for example, college students who pay social security in Hangzhou can directly receive 20,000 yuan.
Money is almost the essence of attracting inflows to this city. Because it gives a foreign college student a guarantee to come to Hangzhou, local students who have just found a job are also very happy to get here.
Let’s not talk about the actual situation, let’s just talk about the plot in the article.
In fact, many times it is necessary to make changes in ideological concepts, and the ancestral methods cannot remain unchanged, because the world is changing, and the change is accelerating.
Giving money to young people is to give them three relatively equal opportunities to participate in competition in their lives (see Chapter 756 for details). Young people receiving money can better lay a better financial foundation for the rest of their lives. When they are old, they can do something better.
There are things that you can't do. Being able to get money when you are young is a guarantee for young people to make a breakthrough in life and realize their ideals. They dare to think and do.
In reality, today's young people don't even think about it, just lie down, let alone do it.
Then there is a classic complaint. Directly giving money will make people get something for nothing and make them lazy. In the main text of Chapter 757, this problem has been deconstructed by a reporter's question.
For an individual, frankly speaking, three opportunities were of no avail. A total of 1.56 million investments were made on him from birth to the age of 35 but could not support him. What followed was a cruel natural elimination, because there is no money to receive after the age of 35. Personally
If his ability does not improve, life will inevitably become more and more difficult. Natural elimination is reflected in the inability to get married, which means that the genes branched into his lineage cannot be continued, and he will naturally be eliminated. Only those young people who seize three opportunities to advance.
People can continue.
For society, eating well and being lazy can also stimulate consumption and stimulate the economy. It can bring markets and expand demand. No one should refute this, so even eating well and being lazy has corresponding value.
Directly giving money to young people can also be regarded as an investment behavior. It is the same as the logic of the current investment industry track by capital tycoons. I don’t know which company can become the next Microsoft or Amazon. Then the entire industry will have a wide track.
If you cast a net, if one of the 100 companies you invest in succeeds, it can offset the losses of the other 99 companies that failed, and you can still make a lot of money.
The principle of distributing money to young people is the same. Geniuses are randomly distributed among groups, and it is impossible to pinpoint which young people are geniuses. Therefore, precise investment cannot be achieved. All we can do is cast a wide net and invest in all young people.
This genius may be from a poor family. The plight of the original family has greatly suppressed him. He may have to make a living by drilling screws, or he may not be able to receive better education, grow up, etc.
It must be admitted that breakthroughs in various ceilings are achieved by a few geniuses.
Giving money to young people can free potential geniuses from the difficulties of making a living. They can turn into dragons when encountering difficulties. To say the least, a real genius can get out of difficulties on his own, but at a huge cost of time.
To the entire society, it is equivalent to slowing down the development speed of society.
The value of one genius may be worth a hundred thousand mediocrities.
When geniuses get out of trouble and are able to flex their muscles and create the next Huawei or the next Microsoft, the combined value of dozens or millions of people who can only drive screws may not be worth it. But when a genius creates
When Microsoft comes next, it will benefit thousands of people.
This is an incremental game, and the absolute majority benefit.
The cruel stock game is involution. Returning to reality, many people must know the feeling of being involved. Unfortunately, they can't involve those geniuses.
The answer is self-evident, which one is better: following the genius to enjoy the world or being swept away by the genius?
Distributing money to young people in the article is actually about discovering potential geniuses in all walks of life. Because I don’t know which one specifically, so if I give money to them all, then there is a certain amount of money that will go to the hands of a certain genius. Just giving money to ordinary people is already enough.
Benefit, when the geniuses get up, you can benefit by following them.
In an incremental environment, all levels of society can benefit.
In the positive cycle of the incremental world, all contradictions will disappear. No matter how great the gap between rich and poor is, no one will think there is a problem, because everyone's wealth is growing.
It is cruel only in the negative feedback of the stock world. His wealth growth is the result of your wealth being exploited. Just like the game of the stock market, every profit he makes is the flesh cut off from your body. That is very
It hurts, how much it hurts, the investors who have lost money or even been cut in half in Big A must have the most say.
Finally, some readers think that the money is too much, and it will be more than 10,000 per month in the future. If you think about it carefully, it is really not much. The time period is as long as 35 years. Not only is it not more, but it is less. Chapter 759: How to send money? You can
Looking back, from the first year of birth, you will receive 500 yuan every month, and then increase by 10% every year.
And this 10% is not set arbitrarily, but refers to the actual growth rate of basic credit currency expansion, which is about 10%. In other words, your average annual salary growth does not exceed 10%, and is actually shrinking. If
A salary cut will result in an even greater reduction.
According to the plot description in the article, you can calculate it here. Assume that you are born on the full moon of 2O22 this year, and you will receive a minimum of 500 yuan/month. For every year you grow older, the monthly amount you receive will increase by 10% compared to the previous year. Until you
When you are 2 years old, you will receive 550 yuan per month, and when you are 3 years old, you will receive 605 yuan per month... By analogy, by the time you are 35 years old, that is, in 2O57, you will receive approximately 12,200 yuan per month this year.
In other words, the 12,000 yuan you received this year has the same purchasing power as the 500 yuan you received 35 years ago. If this is your salary increase in the past 35 years, and your salary has not actually increased, you
Just stay put.
More than 30 years ago, there was a saying that households with 10,000 yuan could not afford the latest fruit phone...
Ignoring inflation, monetary expansion, etc. and just looking at absolute numbers is a hooliganism.
So, after understanding this and understanding it, let’s look at the article that distributed money to young people for 35 years, totaling 1.56 million yuan. The absolute number seems to be a lot, but in fact it is not only not much, but also quite conservative. It has only been maintained for 35 years.
The rate of expansion of basic credit money has not yet exceeded. We are still writing novels, and novels can be appropriately exaggerated.
Monetary inflation, economic growth, and technological progress after thirty-five years are all huge variables in the incremental game. Ignoring these is equivalent to blinding one's vision.
Not to mention that there is a "nuclear-powered harvester" like the male protagonist in the novel that exists like a bug to protect him. This is equivalent to a golden finger, which is another matter. After all, it is an online novel.
In reality, there is currently no social experiment to prove its feasibility. It is more about logically deducing the pros and cons. Because no one has done it at all, it is necessary to experiment first and control the cost. Doing nothing is the real "
"Ideal monster", if you want to change, you have to take the first step, isn't it?
Novels and stories allow you to freely imagine the future and a possibility.
