"20 rebounds? 5678910 blocks? Do you dare to be louder? You Oriental guy!!!" DeAndre Jordan heard Tang Qian's contempt and couldn't help but cursed. He is not Duncan,
Garnett, a veteran, has always been terrible at talking. When Tang Qian provoked him, his brain immediately exploded.
Tang Qian wanted this effect. When people are angry, it is easy to go to extremes, either to explode or to fight randomly. And looking at the course of history, the vast majority of people are the latter.
DeAndre Jordan? 13+ rebounds leader this season? Oh? So what?
To be honest, since Tang Qian came out of the tower, he has no feeling at all for rebounders of this level.
Rodman, Chamberlain, which one is not a super rebounder, super rebounder? 13+ rebounds leader? You can't even touch them if you compete with them.
This is no joke. Ever since Tang Qian couldn't guarantee rebounds in the tower with 17+ rebounds, he has no feeling for the 13+14+15+ rebounds leader and has become numb. What's more, he himself is probably already
Reaching the super level of 20+ rebounds, what kind of concept is this? This is a palace that even Dennis Rodman, the rebounding champion for 7 consecutive years, has not entered.
Today, I just want to try it out.
After Kobe scored consecutive goals, the Clippers began to focus on him. Otherwise, if the power of No. 24 is still there, who knows whether he will do something crazy? But since Kobe now has the most peak version of his body,
Then he won't just focus on himself like he did in the years of 05-06 and 06-07. In fact, starting from the 2007-08 season, Kobe began to become fully mature, and he began to master the skills in a real sense.
, what is his own key to victory.
Otherwise, with the same lineup the Lakers had in those years, there would be no chance of winning consecutive championships.
The famous American freelance commentator Bill Simmons once said that the Lakers in that lineup, without Kobe Bryant, would be a first- and second-round team. Without the encouragement of No. 24, it would be impossible to win consecutive championships. Van Gundy was a guest at the time.
He also expressed his agreement. So it is definitely not the subjective will of the Chinese people. The United States also sees it this way.
Otherwise, if you try that lineup without Kobe, just Gasol, Odom, Fisher, Ariza, and Bynum who is not as good as Thompson of the current Cavaliers? Do you think it can break through the Devils in the Western Conference? Or three times in a row?
? Nonsense is unconvincing, and it is best to go directly to the data. Throughout the entire history of the NBA, the only teams that can continuously enter the finals are the Heat, Pistons, Celtics, Knicks, Bulls, Lakers, and Cavaliers.
Spurs, Warriors. In the entire Western Conference, only the Lakers, Spurs and Warriors can do it. It can be seen that it is very difficult for the Western Conference to enter the finals. If you upgrade it again and turn this consecutive finals into three consecutive finals, you will find that the team
Even rarer. If you only count the data after the 1990s, there are only the Lakers and Warriors in the Western Conference. And if you analyze it more carefully, you can see that Kobe has entered the finals three times this time. The strength and difficulty of the lineup are better than those of OK Combination and the Super Warriors.
, too many difficulties.
Even now it seems that being able to enter three times in a row is almost a miracle.
If Bynum could have averaged 16+11 per game in the 2011-2012 playoffs during that period, that would be about the same. Unfortunately, during the three finals, Bynum has not grown up, and it can even be said that he has not grown up.
One year better than Tristan Thompson. This is just a matter of fact, and after Bynum increased his shooting power, his shooting rate was very low. The 47.7% shooting rate at the 5th position was almost equal to 40% from the outside.
During this period, if it weren't for Kobe, do you really think the Lakers could have entered the finals three times and won the championship twice?
It was indeed impossible for Kobe to lead the team in the early stage, mainly because he had no experience in leading a team alone before. In fact, before Gasol came to the Lakers and Bynum was not injured, Kobe once led the Lakers to the Western Conference.
No. 1. After Bynum was injured, his record dropped to third or fourth in the Western Conference. Then, it took off.
To use an analogy, it’s just an analogy. In the first two years that James led the team, he never made it to the playoffs. But without these two years of leadership experience, do you think he can get stronger as time goes by? His leadership ability is among the best in history.
?If this is the case, James immediately puts the Cavaliers into the playoffs as soon as he enters the NBA. He only needs the playoffs. That is indeed a godsend. But if he is as strong as James, he does not need a 2-year buffer period and
Is it a training period? How many years has Kobe led the team alone? He was injured for half the season at the end. As soon as Gasol came, he led the team to the finals in one breath. It was still continuous. I dare not say that he is better than
A monster like James is strong when leading a team, but he is definitely not as weak as everyone thinks. Tang Qian has always felt that if Kobe had led the team alone from the beginning and practiced alone, his achievements and historical status would be far higher than what he is now.
Don’t believe it? In fact, to put it bluntly, it doesn’t matter if Kobe Bryant wins the first three championships or not, because the bonus for him is too small. For example, if he averages 35+ or more games per game from the beginning
Time, unlimited shooting rights, averaging 20+ points per game in the first season is not a problem, nor is being the Rookie of the Year. In the second season, he will definitely break through 20+, because Kobe only needed 11.6 times in his second season with the Lakers.
He can score 15.4 points with just one shot. What do you think of giving him 20+ shots?
We should also consider that leading a team and leveling alone will definitely increase personal ability growth, which will inevitably lead to faster and more rapid improvement.
If he can average 25+ points per game in the second year, it is already very low. After all, he scored 15+ points on 11+ shots. It is not an exaggeration to score 25+ points on more than 20+ shots. And there are a lot of calculations.
A large number of shots and a rapid increase in leveling time. In this way, the All-Star and All-NBA lineups 2~3 are basically stable. In the third year, with the training mad personality of a person like Kobe, you give him an average of 35 per game in three years.
+ With the above time to level up, the offensive ability is very likely to reach close to the 30+ average per game or reach the 30+ average per game mark. Because in the third grade of the original time and space, he only spent 15+ shots to get 19.9 points. If you
Give him 23 to 25 shots, 30+ is not a dream. Moreover, he has a natural desire to attack. In this way, the league may enter Kobe's crazy scoring period ahead of time. Calculated this way, basically a few more scoring champions will win it a few years earlier.
It is inevitable to have one defense in a row, and with a little reinforcement, maybe you can get an MVP because of your good record. In that case, the early stage will definitely be a scene where Kobe and Iverson are competing for scoring supremacy, and Iverson is not a combination of offense and defense.
, the overall upper limit is not as good as Kobe, and it is certain that he cannot beat Kobe. After all, this Kobe has been practicing in singles since his rookie season, and his growth rate is much faster than that of the original time and space.
In this way, Kobe will lose 3 championships, and he should be able to win a few more scoring titles, win a few more teams, and if he is lucky, he can get an MVP. The following major honors remain unchanged, 2 MVPs, 2 FMVPs, 5 or more
The scoring champion, plus more first-defense numbers than now, the total score reaches 40,000 points (if you score points from the beginning, this is for sure). After retirement, you will see if the historical status will be much higher. Many people will
O'Neal is said to be Kobe's luck. In fact, this is Kobe's biggest misfortune. Because O'Neal, his three championships are almost ignored. No matter what data he produces, facing the weak insiders in the Eastern Conference, O'Neal must be O'Neal.
Won the FMVP. Moreover, he was delayed in leveling and leading the team, and his honor was lost. What do you mean by luck? Where is the luck? Luck is the 3 championships before you, and you will always be the second in charge? You will always be ridiculed as a veteran.
two?
If Kobe didn't have the honor of leading the team later, his status in history would be terrible.
Therefore, three championships are not necessarily a good thing for Kobe in the early stage.
After receiving the highest honor, you can lose countless personal honors and opportunities for personal advancement. Is this lucky or sad?
Besides, that period lasted for 7 to 8 years. It was impossible for the team to continue to strengthen. If it entered the realm of 2007 to 2010 earlier, wouldn't it be possible to win the championship earlier?
So after going through so much and reaching three finals and winning two championships, do you doubt his ability to lead the team? Isn’t that ridiculous? Just ask, who led the team in those years when Kobe was not the leader? Can you tell?
Will anyone else come? Furthermore, as for the issue of PER and WS, this is originally a data model that is not officially recognized by the NBA, and countless players and coaches don’t care about it. You said that Gasol’s WS in the 2010 playoffs was higher than Kobe’s? Hmm
, I’m afraid many people don’t know that Kobe Bryant actually had a higher winning percentage contribution than O’Neal in one of his three consecutive championships. That was when he won the second championship. It can be said that Kobe Bryant was better than O’Neal that year.
The boss of the team? Moreover, Gasol's playoff PER in those three years has never surpassed Kobe's, and has been lower than Kobe's every year. It's really stupid to just talk about a tiebreaker, because FMVP is a
A round of data, not a game.
Let's talk about that game, Kobe's statistics will not be worse than Gasol's.
In a super hand-to-hand battle, again, scoring is the highest level statistic, because basketball is a scoring game.
It is impossible that the average data of 28.6+8+3.9+2.1 per game cannot be compared to 18.6+11.6+3.7+2.6.
As for Curry that year, although he did not play well (compared to his regular season), I personally think that he is definitely more worthy of the FMVP honor than Iguodala. This one is much more "unjust" than Bird.
. But basketball is a competitive sport. If you win, you win. If you don’t win, you won’t win. Regardless of luck or injuries, these are all part of the strength. James has won 4 MVPs, and you say he doesn’t deserve it? That’s not true.
possible!
Don't overly reject a historical giant. It's unimaginable for ordinary people that they can reach this stage.
As for Kobe being ranked twelfth, I want to say that CBS re-ranked the historical status in 2017, and Kobe returned to tenth. Does this count? It’s not like CBS ranked him in 2016 and then again the next year.
Forget it, right? Sports Illustrated, FOX Sports, these are the four major sports media in the United States in 2016. And after Westbrook proves the myth of "Big O" averaging a triple-double per game, the status of "Big O" will only decline in the future.
, will not rise, otherwise what do you want Westbrook to do?
Kobe Bryant was detracted from a lot of impression points in the last three years, but as time goes by, the evaluation will gradually become more fair.
This experience of Kobe Bryant gave Tang Qian a lot of inspiration, so he also needs a lot of time to practice and a lot of team leadership experience. In the past, he focused on improving the defense, but now the defense is almost reaching its limit, and he must turn to improve in the next step.
On the offensive end, Kobe doesn't need the ball, but he needs the right to take shots. This will definitely conflict with Tang Qian's offensive growth.
So like Kobe, who waited 7 to 8 years before starting to lead the team on his own, Tang Qian asked himself, he couldn't do it.
If the "different space" hadn't helped him, he really didn't know what the future would be like.
There are people who don't think about themselves at all and only focus on being Lei Feng. There are not many such people, but there are too few. Tang Qian understands that he cannot be so noble. But for only one year, he can accept that this psychological balance point is equal to
Reached.
Kobe and him are a win-win situation.
As for Jordan? Tang Qian doesn’t think he will be on the same level as him in the future.
This is not pride, this is just fact.
At the end of the half, Jordan was about to cry. He couldn't help but wonder if he didn't train in the summer and was just dreaming. Why? Because his rebounding in the first half was so bad. How bad was it?
There are 9 opponents, but he has only 2.
Not as exaggerated as the ability card, but it still drives Jordan crazy.
Is this still the rebounding game I have worked so hard on all summer? In front of him, I am like a high school student? Being ravaged? Being beaten?
Shi.t! What a joke!!!
When Tang Qian came back in the second half, he found that Jordan had... exploded!
Let me go, this guy really can’t be underestimated!
but……
Do you think you can beat me just by exploding your seed?
Tang Qian grinned and said: Sorry, that was just a dream.
He finally experienced the feeling of Rodman back then. He doesn't care who the top four centers are, and he doesn't care what level of insiders you have. In short...rebounds belong to me! It's that simple!
So rough!
When DeAndre Jordan was substituted, his eyes were straight. He looked at No. 29 on the court, feeling ashamed, annoyed and surprised.
He exploded, but he was still suppressed by his opponent? Is this still a human being? Did he also explode? Or has he entered "The.Zone"?
Tang Qian's physical strength has improved by half a block in the tower. Currently, he can sustain 35 minutes in the regular season. Let's talk about the playoffs. In this game, he scored 11 points, 17 rebounds, 5 blocks and 3 assists.
The solution was that it entered garbage time too early and he was taken off the court early. He only played 31 minutes in the game. What about Kobe? He also "broken his promise" and scored 38 points in 34 minutes, still missing 2 points.
Points 40.
The Lakers defeated their opponents 100-91, 9 points.
If the substitutes weren't too weak and they were caught up a lot in garbage time, the score difference would have been at least 15 points.
The Lakers won the derby in the same city and got a good start.
Charles Barkley said after the game: This was a Black Mamba-style scoring performance, I hope it wasn't an explosion.
An explosion?
Hehe, I'm just afraid that everyone behind me will be frightened.
Tang Qian looked at No. 24, and he also had a preliminary understanding of his defensive strength after leaving the tower.
It's not that Jordan is too weak, it's that his defense is too strong.
But now, this is not the limit.
PS: I often hear people talk about the theory of wealthy families. In fact, if you have really studied the data, you will know that it has no basis at all. Los Angeles is the second largest city in the United States, which is good, but what about the Knicks? Isn’t it more important?
Attracting players? In fact? Look at Chicago, the third largest city in the United States. If it hadn't produced Jordan, what status would it have? How many stars have flocked to it in recent years? Houston is the fourth largest city, do they also have it?
Big city bonus? Philadelphia is the fifth largest city. Does it have a big city bonus? What about Phoenix, which is sixth? What about San Antonio, which is seventh? What about Dallas, which is ninth?
After Kobe retired, everyone saw it, right? Logically speaking, if Kobe is no longer around, big cities should encourage stars to gather together to develop. Or as I said, in fact? The so-called big city effect does not exist in the NBA at all.
Unless you are in some very small cities, it is almost the same. For example, Salt Lake City, Toronto or the largest city in Canada, how many people know? What really compares in basketball is whether you can win the championship, whether you can make a lot of money, and how much exposure you will get in the future.
and development prospects. For example, assuming the Warriors win several championships in the future, they will also become a mecca for players who want to win championships, and have nothing to do with the city. Well, it is not too absolute to say that there is no relationship at all.
, but it is definitely not as exaggerated as some people say. Because when a player goes to a team, the first priority is to make money, and the second is whether the team can meet his vision and whether he can perform. This is extremely important for players who have already won championships. Finally,
In fact, it is the city that is good or not.
To give another example, the Clippers are also in Los Angeles. Their new owner is super rich. Ten of the Bibus family are rich together. Isn't there the factor of a big city? You can say it's a matter of the team's heritage.
This is okay, but using the guise of a big city to deceive people actually only means that your data statistics are too little and not detailed enough.