In fact, regarding the issue of giving up seats, the situation in "Search" is actually somewhat disconnected from reality.
Because nowadays it can be said that when it comes to news about not giving up your seat, most of the time, the target of people's condemnation is no longer the person who refuses to give up his seat. Instead, many similar news are because some people think that young people should give up their seats, and they are even beaten if they don't give up their seats.
news.
So most people condemn this kind of people.
Of course, Ye Lanqiu's refusal to give up his seat in "Search" was actually just an inducement, and this was not actually the target of the online violence.
This is why many people say that the story of "Search" is "a big deal"!
But more people commented instead: "The great thing about Director Dog is that even though the things in "Search" are really big things, the result is still very exciting!"
""Search" is indeed a movie about a series of subsequent events caused by "big shit", but it is also a movie that sees the big from the small and makes people think after watching it. It has a smooth narrative.
, a modern-themed movie with a strong sense of rhythm, where cyber violence is fully exaggerated and displayed. The so-called consensus wins, nothing better than this.
Although the performance of each character is somewhat symbolic, the overall character performance is still remarkable. There is the love between Yang Shoucheng and Ye Lanqiu, the authoritarian Shen Liushu, the female awakening Mo Xiaoyu, and the fear that the world will not be chaotic.
The reporter Chen Ruoxi, the scheming Tang Xiaohua and Yang Jiaqi in the workplace, the eccentric newspaper director, the roaring aunt on the bus, the many netizens who fanned the flames, etc., all these living beings with their own characteristics all witnessed this impetuous life together.
The hustle and bustle of social development more or less reflects the life of real society.
"Search" examines the butterfly effect caused by a "big shit" from a contemporary perspective. Internet verbal violence is a topic worthy of attention, and the protection of personal privacy is also a very real issue. Although this work has some such and such
There are some dissatisfactions, such as the love between the two is not exaggerated enough, the incident on the bus is not realistic enough, etc., but we have to admit that what happened in the movie is really that exaggerated and unreal?"
Film critic Du Xianghai wrote:
"You can't just look at the surface of anything. Although "Search" was triggered by a small incident, in reality, look at the things on the hot search list. How many big incidents are there?
For example, if a certain celebrity can be trending even while sleeping, isn't this a big deal?
Looking at the essence through the phenomenon, the entire film "Search" is simply a few keywords: mainly public opinion orientation, media literacy, and of course, the professional ethics of journalists.
Let’s talk about the orientation of public opinion first.
It is obvious in the film that reporter Chen Ruoxi led the audience in an extreme direction right from the start, that is, Ye Lanqiu's refusal to give up his seat is a moral corruption, a loss of humanity, a crime worthy of death, and must be criticized by public opinion and condemned by society.
condemn.
Chen Ruoxi is a very ambitious reporter. Although she knew clearly that reporters were only reporting news facts, she was lost under the temptation of utilitarianism. She first removed Yang Jiaqi from the news and then took over the job herself.
With all his achievements, he instantly became a celebrity in the industry and dominated the public opinion. Then he ignored Ye Lanqiu's apology video, and also led the interviewees to make unfavorable remarks about Ye Lanqiu. He also used a pen to avenge Ye Lanqiu's robbery.
Leave your boyfriend alone!
Are there many reporters like Chen Ruoxi in reality? I don’t know, but I know there must be!
Especially in the era of self-media, authority has long been lost, and what is mostly pursued is no longer authority, but traffic and eyeballs.
Often as long as they can gain attention, they can break through any bottom line.
I remember a media person said: Maybe we can’t know the truth, and reporters don’t know either. Reporters can only and must present the entire incident in front of the audience completely. What happened is a fact; only the judge can
Sentencing a person, not the reporter, let alone the audience.
However, "Search" has revealed the darkest side of current public opinion. We all know that whether Ye Lanqiu is right or wrong is definitely not a matter that Chen Ruoxi has the final say on, but the role of Chen Ruoxi is very interesting.
It truly reflects the current situation of a journalistic community.
Faced with quantifiable numbers such as ratings, audience attention, retweets, comments, etc., reporters continue to dig out some so-called newsworthy news. To put it bluntly, any relevant social conflicts will cause great repercussions and make reporters
After becoming successful and famous, amplifying these contradictions and constantly intensifying them through words and cameras has become a passion of many journalists.
Sometimes people can't help but reflect. Every day when you turn on the TV and open the newspaper, you are filled with negative news. Do the public really need to be fed so much negative information to make them believe that our society is on the verge of collapse?
If this continues, will it be possible to return to the era of pornographic news?
Especially now that short videos are popular, it can be said to be particularly scary. I remember a friend complained to me that my wife at home watched short videos every day, and big data pushed her some negative news every day, such as her concern about food.
Safety, so big data began to brainwash her by repeatedly pushing related food safety incidents that occurred across the country. As a result, his wife is now almost unwilling to eat out, and checks the ingredients when buying things, which makes him suffer.
It was unspeakable, and they even complained that if this continued, their whole family would starve to death.
Many of us understand that news reports often focus on "special events," but survivorship bias is everywhere these days.
Back to the topic, let’s imagine that if Chen Ruoxi was not responsible for the Ye Lanqiu incident, but instead it was Yang Jiaqi. At the beginning of the incident, what we saw was that Ye Lanqiu acted wildly on the bus and refused to give up his seat. The report came out.
Everyone was talking about it, and there was no problem with this. Next, Ye Lanqiu reflected on himself, made a video to apologize to the whole society, and continued to report it, so that everyone could see that Ye Lanqiu was regretful. At this time, maybe everyone would start
I will relax a little and dig deeper. Ye Lanqiu was a good student with excellent academic performance during middle school. The whole school was proud of her. Why would such a person do such a thing on the bus? What is the hidden secret?
?Follow this and continue to dig deeper, and the path ahead will be completely different.
In fact, many times when we receive a message, we will not make a judgment on whether the message is right or wrong. Once the public opinion orientation is added, we can easily make a judgment, whether we follow the public opinion or not.
Whether to make judgment A or to go the other way and make judgment B, such a result may have been processed and transformed by the media. So why is it repeatedly emphasized that reporting facts is not the truth, let alone judging right or wrong.
However, "Search" very straightforwardly exposed how the current media is doing. They are no longer satisfied with just reporting the facts. Instead, they prefer to use invisible hands to finalize and conclude something.
definition.
Let’s talk about media literacy. To put it simply, in today’s society with developed media, there are no longer simple audiences and communicators. Everyone is both an audience and a communicator, just like Weibo. In the process of forwarding, everyone
It has completed the process of transforming the identity of the audience into the communicator, and at the same time completed a secondary communication. In this way, everyone is required to have good media literacy and be able to judge the meaning and value of media information.
There was a scene in the film that impressed me deeply, that is, Ye Lanqiu went to the housekeeping company to find a nanny, but was criticized verbally and verbally. Before leaving, he was photographed by onlookers and posted on the Internet. The relationship between Yang Shoucheng and Ye Lanqiu was also instantly described.
The blackmail caused Chen Ruoxi to retaliate.
After reading it, many people may think that it is a bit exaggerated?
But in fact, it is really not an exaggeration at all!
Because many times, the information received by the public is very one-sided. If it only reports facts and makes objective evaluations, then maybe people who receive this information will think about it. But when the media reports an event in the name of authority,
After characterization, they don't need to think about it at all.
Everyone seems to be blinded and cannot tell right from wrong. When a person's shortcomings are infinitely magnified under the camera, no one will explore the person's advantages. But in fact, this person is not without advantages, but everyone
Ignore was chosen.
When the high-achieving student's murder case caused an uproar at that time, all public opinions initially portrayed the top student from a prestigious university as a murderous demon without blinking an eye, a murderer with an extremely dark heart. Everyone was saying something wrong about him.
He is as bad as he is, but in fact, there is a lot of sadness behind the other person committing such a crime, and he has always been a very kind and filial person.
Only after the media corrected the report later did everyone suddenly realize that they began to express their pity for him, saying that he was a good boy and those who were killed were the bad boys. The result of low media literacy is that everyone can only be criticized by the media.
People are led by the nose, and since the media is not sure about the direction of public opinion, people are worried about whether the path they are led by is the right path or a narrow path.
Finally, I have to say that Shen Liushu is an expert in public relations. In order to do a good job in crisis public relations, he can ignore his wife's feelings, years of marriage, and the life and death of Ye Lanqiu, an old employee, and randomly set wedding anniversaries to expose fake news.
, shed tears in front of the scene, framed Chen Ruoxi, and other tricks that made the fight between him and Chen Ruoxi very interesting."
When a movie becomes popular, the characters in it will naturally be criticized by many people.
Ye Lanqiu and Yang Shoucheng will not say more.
The most controversial person is not Chen Ruoxi, Tang Xiaohua, or Mo Xiaoyu, but the character Yang Jiaqi.
Some people think that the Ye Lanqiu incident in "Search" would have had a completely different result if Yang Jiaqi had reported it, saying that Yang Jiaqi pays more attention to the truth.
But some people also think that Yang Jiaqi is the most disgusting character in the whole movie.
On the other hand, it is Chen Ruoxi. Although this role is a little controversial, one thing is unquestionable. That is, this is the most straightforward "evil" character in the entire movie.
Comments on the Internet: "If you have to find a bad guy in the film, then it must be Chen Ruoxi. She is not wrong in reporting social news, and it does not mean she is wrong to attribute other people's films to her own name. Her moral corruption is at best as despicable as that of the second secretary. But when she learned that her boyfriend had eloped with someone else, she resolutely used the official media to avenge her personal vendetta, fabricating the fact that Ye Lanqiu was the mistress without any evidence, and exposing it On the Internet, she has been the rumor maker and spreader of the entire incident from beginning to end, and can also be said to be the biggest external inducement for Ye Lanqiu's death. This also led to Shen Liushu's final murder."
As for Yang Jiaqi's controversy, the official view is somewhat similar to that of Du Xianghai. They both believe that Yang Jiaqi just did what a reporter should do. She has a very keen sense of smell for media people, so she photographed Ye Lanqiu without giving up her seat. event.
But Yang Jiaqi did not do evil in this incident, but she also filmed Ye Lanqiu's apology video, so some people think that Yang Jiaqi may not be a good person, but at least she is not a perpetrator.
But the other party felt that Chen Ruoxi's badness could be directly seen, while Yang Jiaqi was hypocritical.
They also presented evidence to support their views.
The most convincing point is: "When everyone was criticizing Ye Lanqiu, Yang Jiaqi was one of the few who knew the truth and held Ye Lanqiu's apology video. But what did she do? ?She didn’t do anything. This is a greater evil. Why didn’t she do anything?
She was a reporter, even a trainee reporter, but she didn't do that. The first reason was because she was afraid of offending Chen Ruoxi, and the second reason? It seemed that doing so would not do her any good!
We have no way to ask someone, even if the other person is a reporter, to defend Ye Lanqiu, but Yang Jiaqi is different. She is the instigator of the whole incident. She shot the first video, and she was also the one who interviewed Ye Lanqiu. Then she chose to turn a blind eye and let Chen Ruoxi and the Internet mobs conduct cyber violence against Ye Lanqiu. This behavior is even more hateful!
Not only that, but also remember that after Chen Ruoxi learned that Ye Lanqiu and her boyfriend Yang Shoucheng were together, wasn't the last article reported by insiders the product of Chen Ruoxi's dictation of Yang Jiaqi's code words? And Yang Jia at that time How excited Qi is...
And you have to know that Yang Shoucheng is Yang Jiaqi's cousin. It's really righteous to kill a relative! So, some people actually think that Yang Jiaqi is better than Chen Ruoxi? That's incredible!
So if Chen Ruoxi is a "bad person", then Yang Jiaqi is a hypocritical villain!
Chen Ruoxi can ignore the truth for the sake of fame and fortune, but Yang Jiaqi is even more awesome. For the sake of fame and fortune, she can choose to use the long-lost apology video to make profits for herself after Ye Lanqiu's death! Isn't such a person even more terrifying? "
