Chapter 1,583 The floating singing turns hell into heaven
As "Spring in the Cowherd Class" officially started to be released, the number of voices gradually increased.
Especially the role of Pierre in the movie can be said to be full of controversy.
Why do you say that?
"Although Matthew, as a teacher, nurtures "bad kids" into talents without seeking fame or fortune, it can be said that these two children, Pierre and Pepino, are the most special in Matthew's heart.
He preferred Pierre to Pepino, but what was the result?
But Pierre couldn't even remember Matthew's name. He really felt sad for Matthew and also sad for Pierre's indifference!"
"Yes, at the beginning of the movie, he couldn't remember Matthew's name. He didn't think it was a big deal at first, but after watching the movie, he suddenly felt that Pierre was too cold and too selfish!"
"Who says it's not? Can we say that without Matthew, Pierre would have achieved that kind of achievement? I think it's impossible! Matthew even wrote him a letter of recommendation, but after so many years, he didn't even go back to read it.
Matthew, or rather, didn't remember Matthew's name for once, which is really outrageous!
To put it harshly, does this constitute a certain degree of ingratitude?”
"The ungratefulness is a bit excessive, but it does make people uncomfortable!"
"Toto in "Cinema Paradiso" was because Alfred didn't want him to come back, so he didn't come back until he died.
But Pierre didn't even know that Matthew was dead. I have to say that this is really sad. As his enlightenment mentor, Matthew's kindness to him is self-evident, but he has forgotten that, together with
Matthew’s name! It’s so hard to like!”
"Can't you say that? Because Pierre didn't know that it was Matthew who had the idea for his mother to send him to the Lyon Music School. Matthew never told Pierre that he just wanted to help a son who was not being treated by him.
An understanding mother and a gifted but buried child. It wasn't until Pepino came to Pierre's house fifty years later with Matthew's diary and told him everything that Pierre suddenly realized that this enlightening teacher had his own life.
The passer-by was the mentor who changed his life, which led to this story."
"This highlights that Matthew's life was unknown, but it affected many people."
"Perhaps in these 50 years, Pierre also met many people who changed him.
But actually I don’t quite understand. After all, Matthew is his first teacher and the first person to make him appreciate!
How could you not remember?"
"Facing the reality, Pierre has become a famous conductor, which is in huge contrast to an ordinary little person. He has become famous and experienced countless wonderful things. It is unusual for him to be unable to remember people's names!"
"It's enough for the person upstairs to describe ungratefulness in such a fresh and refined way!"
"Okay, the core narrative of this movie is: "No one knows about this great teacher."
Even his most proud students barely remember him, which is the most important part of this core statement. I think this may be because Director Gou is afraid that this movie is not touching enough."
Some film critics also raised this question in their lengthy film reviews.
"Actually, I feel quite sad.
Reading other comments, it is said that this is a movie that evolves the soul and triggers thinking about human nature education.
But overall, I felt that it was quite sad. That’s not to say that sadness is bad. In fact, I think it was precisely because of this sadness that the movie reached a certain height.
The biggest source of sadness should be Matthew's subsequent mediocre life.
The ending I predict or expect should focus on an important competition. The choir got a chance to participate in a major competition, but the principal came forward to obstruct it. Matthew escaped from the principal's blockade with the help of other teachers.
, stepped onto the stage at the last second and led the choir to great success. The choir received glory, Matthew also received applause, and the film came to an end.
I didn't expect that the singing for the Countess would be the most important occasion. And this scene focused on Matthew's understanding of the little boy, rather than the choir's success in overcoming difficulties. There were no tear points, which was a touching moment.
I was surprised and happy.
But I am still sad, because Matthew was still that ordinary person until the end. His patience and hard work did not bring him success recognized by the world. His life was like the life of a dedicated ordinary teacher.
, and such teachers can only stay in their posts for the rest of their lives, without flowers or applause. I feel very unfair, maybe I am too superficial, but I am just sad, sad for Matthew.
There is another sad point - Pierre's forgetfulness.
For Matthew, Pierre is Matthew's pride. For Pierre, Matthew is the person who changed his life. Matthew led Pierre on the road of professional music and convinced her
His mother sent him to the Conservatory of Music. It can be said that without Matthew, Pierre would not be as successful as he is now.
But Pierre forgot Matthew's name.
Pierre's success certainly does not come from Matthew. He should be grateful for his musical talent and for having a great mother.
But what I feel sad about is that he should not forget Matthew's name. He should have met many, many teachers in his life. To reach his height, there must be well-known musicians among his teachers. He studied with so-and-so
The artist's experience may be followed and reported by magazines. But no one will know that there is a great unknown educator in the dark place at the bottom of Zengtang. Without him, Pierre would not be as successful as he is today.
Some people might say that it was because he didn't know that Matthew went to his mother and made her decide to take him to Lyon, but this doesn't make sense at all. Could Matthew's mother not tell him?
After all, why did he get the opportunity? It was Matthew's recommendation letter! In this case, it is impossible for him not to know how much Matthew helped him, but he still forgot this extremely important person in his life.
This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content! I discussed this issue with my friend, and he said that in fact, many teachers are like this in reality. From the perspective of "success" in the current society, they are all very ordinary.
, stick to your job, and what you can’t see behind your back is the world of peaches and plums.
He said that when he saw this paragraph, he was also surprised. Why couldn't the "mentor" be called by his name? He felt very unfair and disappointed to Matthew. But suddenly he said that when he thought about himself now, he was deeply impressed by the teacher who helped him.
, he couldn’t name them either, but he knew the subjects they taught.
Sometimes calling "teacher" is enough!
But I cannot agree with the view that "just calling you a teacher is enough". First of all, other teachers may just give you more knowledge in the subject. But Matthew changed the trajectory of his life. He was the turning point, so to speak.
, without Matthew, there would be no him later.
To say the least, I think it is sad that a teacher has spent so much effort for his students. When the students grew up and became famous, they did not try to contact this life-changing teacher. At least from my own experience, several classmates returned home after graduation.
It is normal to visit teachers in school. Every year, I mail special products to the head teacher who helped me at that time.
Maybe he doesn't lack these things, but I just want to tell him that I still remember him and will always remember him!
I don’t know if this is some kind of moral kidnapping. It’s not that he wants to provide any material support for Matthew. I just hope that in the end, the news of Matthew leaving school was at least found out by him, rather than relying on his classmates to travel thousands of miles away.
, brought this news from a distance after Matthew's death. This shows that he never tried to find out about Matthew. This is what saddens me the most."
In fact, many people are also discussing this topic.
Without him, it can be said that Chinese people have always paid attention to respecting teachers and teachings since ancient times.
"Maybe it's because we are Chinese, because we pay more attention to respecting teachers. You know, in ancient times, becoming a teacher was a very, very important thing, and the teacher could even be half of the student's father.
Even in modern times, we always give more respect to teachers. At least, I believe that every parent has absolute respect for a good teacher.
But Pierre in the movie, to be honest, no matter how many reasons he has, he can't cover it up, even for fifty years!
In fifty years, it can be seen that he has never even visited or even heard anyone talk about this teacher. How is he now? Is he okay?
He didn't!
He didn't even remember that he had such a mentor until Pepino took out the photo!
What I want to say is that Matthew can be called the mentor who changed Pierre's destiny the most, right? In other words, is it not an exaggeration to call him Pierre's mentor?
If Pierre doesn't do well, then maybe everyone won't care so much, but the problem is that he is already the world's top conductor and he is making music. Could it be that when he is making music, he just...
Have you never thought of the teacher who once inspired him in music?
What kind of cold-blooded person would be like this, so I really feel worthless for Matthew. I believe that Matthew must be paying attention to this proud disciple, and maybe he has also thought about whether this proud disciple will one day
Come to visit him?
But no! Even after Matthew passed away, he never saw his former proud disciple again.
Maybe it was the director's arrangement. Do you still remember the first time when the teacher said that Pierre had the face of an angel but the heart of a devil?
Maybe the ending of this story just confirms this sentence.
Matthew may not regret having discovered a protégé like Pierre, but as bystanders, it is difficult for us to understand what Pierre did!"
In addition to the controversy over the character of Pierre, many people also have controversy over Matthew's education methods.
Nothing else, because in the movie, it can be said that the rebellion and problems of the students at the bottom of the pond also made many people think that Matthew was a bit of a "holy mother"!
Of course, this interpretation is not unreasonable.
After all, the roles of Meng Dan and Corban given in the movie, it can be said that what they did has indeed exceeded everyone's imagination.
"Mengdan set the fire and Corban stole the money. It was not a small sum of money. Matthew even forgave such behavior. I can't understand it!"
"Yes, I'm also thinking, why did Matthew protect Corban? Just because he was a child? But stealing so much money and causing Meng Dan to be wrongly accused doesn't make any sense, right?"
"Yes, although it is said that one size does not fit all, it is true that the problems of these two children, Meng Dan and Korban, are really serious!"
"Meng Dan set the fire? Isn't it? Isn't it? The movie tells you that he set the fire? Isn't this just as prejudiced as the principal? If you have made a mistake before, you will inevitably make another mistake? Who said he set the fire?
As for Corban, what I want to say is that his concept of money is not that profound, right? In fact, in some schools, children steal things from their classmates, but do they have to call the police and send them to a juvenile detention center?
Note, they are children!"
"I don't think one size fits all, right? Not all the children here are bad. There are orphans like Pepino, rebellious children like Pierre who are not bad in nature, and of course there are children like Mengdan!
"
"The "mistake-punishment" faction represented by the principal and Matthew's reform faction are two opposing camps. There is no saying which one is definitely better. The principal faction can quickly correct, which is equivalent to using people's conditioned reflexes to use violence to associate mistakes.
, thereby reducing crime; and Matthew feels that it should be influenced and slowly taught. Both education methods are used in reality. It is best to use different education methods according to local conditions. There is no need to rise to the level of conscious contempt.
Bar!"
"The movie itself raises a question for many people: when you face a group of young but naughty and evil children, how do you treat them?
This chapter is not over yet, please click on the next page to continue reading! Is it better to be coaxing, or is it to be solved simply and violently?
I believe most people will definitely answer the former!
But the discrepancy between words and actions, the distance between reality and ideals, we always see the second kind!
Our protagonist Matthew seems to have some honest feelings. He is simple and ideal. When he entered the prison-like school and witnessed the scenes that happened in front of him, I think he was shocked.
He can walk away if he lives an unacceptable life, or he can just go with the flow!
But he didn't. He chose to stay and change everything. Although it was not as easy as it seemed, his love for the children was a powerful motivation for him to stay. Most of the bad people in the world are not
The real bad guys just choose silence and obedience when they should stand up!
And Matthew is indeed a simple and good person, too simple to survive in this society, but it is often those simple people who change the world. Composing music is his dream. When he came here, he started composing music to entertain children.
Sing, we always believe that music is the greatest power and the most beautiful thing in human history. It can infect all the evil and filth in the world and purify our hearts and the world.
In the end, he changed the people and the world around him with his actions, and those songs will become the purifier of the soul forever.
When he came to this school, I was confused. When he was teased and bullied by the students, I was angry. When he selflessly protected the students, I was happy. When he led the children to sing in that dark world, I was happy.
It was shocking. When he had to leave, paper planes flew down all over the sky. I was sad and moved. We watched such a film and didn’t know what was so good about him, but it really moved us and shocked us. I
I think that's enough.
We ask ourselves, if we were once one of such children, would you rather meet a person like the principal or a person like Matthew? The answer is self-evident. From the perspective of bystanders, we can make comments.
But what if it’s us? Who wouldn’t want to meet a teacher like Matthew?”