Are these viewers stupid? So many bugs actually make them want to watch it again?
Why do so many fans who criticize "Youth 2" not have this reaction?
At this time, a movie review that was pinned to the top made Ping Xiaosi and Ou Bin understand why this happened!
The author of this film review is also very interesting.
The film critic known as the "King of Trouble Finders", Fang Long!
The title of his review is: "This is definitely not a comedy! Written after watching the movie for the second time"
"After the premiere, I wrote my first film review. I picked out many unreasonable aspects of the film. But after I finished writing, I couldn't understand why the film suddenly jumped from a highly realistic story.
What's the purpose of turning it into a dramatic story? Why do you want to set up the plot like this? So I couldn't help but watch it again, so I wrote this second movie review.
When I watched it for the first time, I felt that the ending was a bit abrupt and even bugs were everywhere.
At first I thought it was because Li Yi was not good at filming such a nonsensical style of film for the first time, so these exaggerated bugs appeared.
But when I read it for the second time, I realized that this was not the case!
Because "The King of Comedy" is actually a complete tragedy, a tragedy that makes me unable to laugh no matter what!
Because I understood the abrupt ending, it was just that Li Yi used a form that was inconsistent with the previous style, and contradicted the reality everywhere, and even torn it apart to tell you that the protagonist Yin Tianqiu died on the spot for 800 yuan.
In "The King of Comedy", Liu Piaopiao calls Yin Tianqiu "a sidekick", and Yin Tianqiu retorts with a hint of self-deprecation, "You can call me a sidekick, but can you not add the word "death" in front of it?"
I think the word "death" has two meanings: one is to never change; the other is to die miserably.
Yin Tianchou is an acting fanatic. Although he is just a walk-on, he is always thinking about being a walk-on with a sense of presence. He is very serious about acting, but he messes up things time and time again. The first time he acts as a walk-on, he will not die.
The priest who became a dead body for the second time was praised by Du Juan'er, but he touched a mechanism and sent Du Juan'er flying out of the window. Such a person will never be able to stand out in his life, but the design of the film made him a dog.
As luck would have it, Du Juaner promoted him to the leading role, and he had a promising future, but at the last moment, he chose Liu Piaopiao and missed the lead. If he had always cherished the dream of acting, he would definitely seize this opportunity. But
At his core, he is just a walk-on, acting just for a living.
After watching the ending of "Happy Reunion" and looking back at the whole movie, I believe everyone will feel that the ending of the movie is too abrupt. It suddenly switches from a movie about the lives of small people to a movie about cops and gangsters, and finally a group of people co-starring in "Thunderstorm"
》A happy reunion attended by many spectators. The insertion of these two plots seems to be abrupt and dramatic.
So we might as well imagine what the ending should be like according to the original story pattern of "The King of Comedy"?
To understand this problem, we must first find out where the dramatic plot begins.
In fact, the plot of the field boss becoming an undercover agent to find Yin Tianqiu as an informant is not dramatic, because although this kind of plot is very rare, it is more or less likely to happen in reality, and it makes sense logically. I
I think the really dramatic plot started after the field eldest brother was shot.
After being shot, Yin Tianchou picked up the gun and killed the three gang members.
There is no doubt that a temporary worker in a community welfare home or an extra on a movie set would never be able to kill three well-trained gangsters in a close-range shootout. Moreover, the pistol was used in the movie.
With the machine gun effect, this is actually very obvious. I believe that no director would really make such a mistake, so there is only one possibility. This is the director's deliberate intention!
So the real situation should be that Yin Tianchou, a bit actor who was always bad at acting, was shot and died after becoming the leading actor for the first time and giving a failed performance. You can imagine the final situation,
The undercover agent and Yin Tianchou were both shot. The police rushed in and had a shootout with the gangsters. When the undercover agent was dying, he saw that Yin Tianchou was bleeding all over his body but still stared at the gangsters fiercely, so he shouted weakly.
"Cut", Yin Tianqiu relaxed and closed his eyes. The steward looked at him and slowly closed his eyes. This was the first time a supporting actor played a leading role and he had been a police undercover agent all his life.
Died together because of an unsuccessful performance...
So, can everything be explained?
I think the reason for adopting this method of expression is because it would be too tragic to present the reality directly. We can imagine that Yin Tianqiu is dead, but what about Liu Piaopiao? She finally left the past place,
He placed all his future on Yin Tianchou.
She knitted a scarf for him at the place where he lived, but he did not come back after knitting the scarf. She waited day after day, but he would never come back, and no one would tell her that Yin Tianchou was dead.
She will think that he has been lying to her before, she will think that he has become a starring role, and will never think of her again, and will never pay attention to her again. What will happen to Liu Piaopiao in the future? The answer is also obvious.
Yes, the man she had high hopes for, the man who rekindled her enthusiasm for life, has disappeared. Her renewed enthusiasm for life will also disappear and she will become discouraged. Then there are only two options in front of her.
Road - commit suicide, or return to the original life.
Mr. Hong and his little brother will continue to wander around, scare children, collect protection money, and will never stage a thunderstorm on the stage with a happy face.
Du Juaner will continue to act in her movies and become her star. One day she may accidentally discover the death of Yin Tianchou in the police files. She may shed a few tears for this old friend. After that, she will tell everyone
A newcomer to the industry tells the story of Yin Tianchou and tells them what the "professionalism" of an actor is...
But such an ending is too desperate and sad. I believe it is difficult for any audience to accept it!
But this is the fate of the people at the bottom, which is sad and lamentable. The dawn is very beautiful, but Yin did not survive the dawn.
In real life, we may not even be able to get a box lunch with our efforts and struggles. But, at least in The King of Comedy, we hope that Yin Tianchou, who has the shadow of all of us, will get a share of his own.
own happiness.
The story about Liu Piaopiao knitting a sweater at the beach for a day, just waiting for Yin Tianchou to come back.
The story of finally realizing his dream and co-starring in Thunderstorm with big names.
Therefore, I still like the ending in the movie. Because such an ending allows us to see warmth under the dark background of the entire film, rather than complete despair.
No one likes "It's pitch black ahead and you can't see anything."
Everyone will prefer to hear that sentence: It will be beautiful after dawn."
After reading the comments on this interpretation, Ping Xiaosi was confused, and Ou Bin was also confused.