Evolution Beyond the Stars Volume 1 The Beginning of Eden o1227RTs——Speech content——
First of all, thank you very much for your affirmation, and then I want to explain.
Mrs. Mills is an insurance company claims department employee with more than 20 years of work experience. She has worked in the grassroots claims department for fifteen years, and has only been promoted to management in the past few years.
But what Mrs. Mills may not have expected is that she thought that being promoted to management would allow her to drink coffee every day and enjoy life like her previous boss, but in fact, her private life time was further compressed.
This makes Mrs. Mills miserable, and the high housing prices and tax burden make it difficult for Mrs. Mills to feel the warmth of society, let alone happiness.
Therefore, Mrs. Mills must be eager to have her personal will absolutely respected.
She hopes that the justice can bring justice to her, and she hopes that her company can pay her high compensation and a satisfactory vacation. At the same time, she hopes that she can get off work on time.
Because just like the purpose of many job seekers when they first enter the workplace, our purpose of entering society, participating in work and producing output is for ourselves and our families, rather than, or in other words, not having such a noble desire to improve society.
Overall, make some social contributions.
Especially middle class people like Mrs. Mills, who play a very important role in society.
Imagine that if Mrs. Mills gets off work on time every day, it will be almost impossible to complete the day's work, monthly performance will not improve, the company's interests will be damaged, and in turn, she and her staff may face unemployment.
Therefore, this inhumane oppression seems to have its "humane" purpose and necessity related to "humanity".
Is it difficult for everyone to understand what I am saying?
Okay, I'll be more simple and specific, and let's ask Mrs. Mills again.
If possible, if the chief judge is willing to stand up and uphold justice for you and allow you to enjoy full rights of personal will, would you be willing to accept this right?
Is my question a bit too straightforward, or too difficult to understand?
No, kid, it’s not difficult to understand. I understand what you mean. If you really ask me to answer, I don’t want to assert my personal rights at this time, because that is also my obligation in society...
It’s just... what I want to say is that I am in pain, I am really in pain... you will not understand...
No, Mrs. Mills, your family will understand, people who really care about you, people who have shared your experience, will understand.
Of course, I also hope to understand.
But you see, I am a guy who makes money by talking on the stage, and I am more hateful than a speculator.
Okay, we are not here today to discuss heavy social topics, but we hope that everyone can jointly recognize and understand the problems, and deepen mutual respect and understanding.
Just like Mrs. Mills, perhaps in the eyes of painter Charlie, she used to be a woman with a gloomy face all day long. She lived in a big house, but she was fussy with him because of the paint problem.
But now, I think Charlie should feel very lucky.
I am glad that I am a carefree and happy painter. At least the money he earns is spent on his favorite oil paintings instead of on drugs to treat depression.
Of course, Mrs. Mills, I didn't mean to offend you, I just hope to resolve this little conflict between you.
No, kid, after listening to your words, I suddenly feel much better.
So... let's continue.
After talking about the examples of the middle class, let’s look at the elite class.
In this class, whether absolute respect for personal will is linked to happiness no longer seems to be a question that needs to be discussed.
Don’t ask why first, let’s randomly select a few of the guests and let them tell us the answers.
So...let's start with Ms. Stina Koch.
Please, Stina.
Hello.
Hello, hoo! I didn’t expect that you, the first female astronaut to complete a spacewalk, are so beautiful.
Stina: Surprised?
No, no, okay, I admit, I didn’t expect it. You know, in the common impression we all have, girls like top academics are generally... Well, fellow feminists, please don’t get me wrong, I didn’t offend.
Meaning.
Then it seems you really should apologize.
Okay, we have to hurry up.
Grab something?
Forehead……
Okay, okay, my face is almost red, just like when I went on a blind date for the first time, uh... boys must remember to protect themselves when going out now.
Ha ha
That is the question I just mentioned. In your opinion, does it mean happiness when one's will is absolutely respected?
Hmm... I think the question you repeated may be different from what I just heard.
Oh, is it so?
So maybe I was a fish in my previous life? So, please give me a name? Do you need to see my real estate certificate first?
Haha, okay, let me just briefly explain my point of view... Actually, how should I put it, the absolute respect of personal will is something that exists on a theoretical level and cannot be fully implemented in practice.
things, so I personally think that whether people’s subjective will should be respected
It should not be understood from an objective level, uh... can you understand what I mean?
Well, it's really a wonderful statement. I roughly understand what you mean, but maybe the audience friends here are still a little confused, so I will simply explain it to you and see if that's what you mean.
Okay, please
You're welcome.
Am I a little too anxious?
Hey, no, please continue.
Well, okay... I think what Miss Stina just said is actually Mrs. Mills' last answer just now.
She believes that the absolute respect of an individual's self-will is too theoretical, and that it is too one-sided to simply evaluate whether a person's will should be respected from an objective perspective.
Just like Mrs. Mills, she personally hopes that she can go to get off work normally and have her own life.
But if a justice really requires her to go to and from get off work on time, but denies other objective and concrete realities, this will most likely lead to the explosion of more social problems.
Mrs. Mills's personal will may not have been well reflected in the end, but became worse.
Therefore, when we mention that personal will is absolutely respected, it requires both objective identification and respect for subjective understanding. In other words, we cannot say "absolutely."
The concept of "absolute" itself can easily lead to misunderstandings and problems.
The above is my personal understanding of Miss Stina’s words.
Miss Stina, do you think my understanding is correct?
Well, your understanding is very good, even beyond my opinions, and I have benefited a lot.
Haha, Miss Stina, you are so humble.
Well, thank you for coming on stage.
You're welcome.
——Three more guests came on stage later. They were the captain of a civil aviation airliner, the president of an oil company and a singer——
As you can see, as well as the results of my survey before starting my speech, in the eyes of most elites, the absolute respect of personal will is unrealistic, and it cannot be compared with happiness.
causal connections between.
The few remaining elites did not express their objections. They just felt that the issue itself was meaningless, so they chose to remain silent.
However, in my opinion, today’s speech, with RTs as the title and starting point to explore our social structure and individuals’ understanding and definition of happiness, cannot regard such an issue as meaningless.
I can even say clearly that it is very meaningful! It is even an issue that should be discussed and understood by the world between all individuals and the whole.
This painting, its name is "The Hangover", is a masterpiece by the famous painter Owen De.
It is said that he was traveling by car in the countryside. On the way to his destination, his vehicle broke down and he encountered heavy fog. So he drank on the roadside and waited for the fog to clear before calling for help.
In the process, he saw a white sky and some strange lights, so he drew it.
This work is now in a private villa.
The purchase price at that time was US$37.55 million!
friends!
Thirty-seven million five hundred and fifty thousand dollars!
It's really hard for me to imagine that anyone would be willing to pay the price of an island for a painting with only a few dots of oil paint.
Can you imagine?
So if I told you that I actually made up the above story, and that this painting was a masterpiece created by my youngest son Charles who accidentally knocked over the drawing board, would you think this family is a complete idiot?
Yes, this family may really be too rich, otherwise who would pay for such a... um... "art work" by a master?
But the truth of the matter is.
There is indeed such a work, or in other words, there are many similar works of art that have been auctioned at high prices around the world, either with museums or private households and bought them as collections at high prices.
And the work I am showing you now is not the masterpiece of Charles’s youngest son.
It really exists, and the price is as high as $37.55 million!
The person behind it is none other than my grandfather, Chu Guanming.
It's a bit embarrassing.
But I don’t want to use everyone’s words to mock my grandfather’s taste here.
Rather, I want to discuss with you my personal understanding of art.
In other words, our personal understanding of value.
So, since we are talking about personal understanding of art, or in other words, personal understanding of value.
My grandfather spent nearly 40 million US dollars to buy such a painting. Is it an absolute manifestation of personal will?
It seems that everyone's opinions are different, so let me put it another way.
In other words, if all of us here spend a sum of money to buy something that we think is worth it.
Regardless of what others say, after the purchase is over, are our personal wills absolutely respected?
This gentleman has a good question.
What on earth do I want to say.
yes.
in our country
In some remote mountainous areas, it only takes one to two million yuan to build a well-equipped primary school for them.
But my grandfather spent nearly 40 million U.S. dollars and more than 200 million yuan to buy an art masterpiece that was probably just a child's unintentional creation.
Whether an individual's will is absolutely respected, I think there is no longer any debate.
But the problem is, I am not here to explain the value orientation today.
But to illustrate, in fact, each of us has completely different feelings about value.
We may be influenced by various opinions and thoughts, but certain behaviors can reflect ourselves.
And this kind of self, that is, humanism, is the most fundamental guarantee that supports the harmony and stability of our entire contemporary society and that everyone can achieve happiness.
To put it more generally, each of us is an RTs.
In other words, they are all a collection of biological algorithms based on RTs mode.
I saw that some viewers chose to leave. I expressed some regret for this, but I respect your personal will. I hope that after this speech, if you have learned something in your daily life, you can return to the scene through video playback.
Continue this journey of thought with me.
grateful.
Algorithms are the title of my speech tomorrow, and today our main content is still centered around the concept of RTs.
After going in such a big circle, it's like after talking about a lot of hobbies and interests on a blind date with a girl, we still have to return to the most basic appearance.
Right?
We have to make sure we want to sleep with this person across from us, right?
Um, sorry, I may have been a bit blunt.
But that’s true, isn’t it?
I said a lot, which may have confused many people instead of gaining anything.
So I bring the topic back to the beginning.
Back to RTs.
But RTs also have a lot to talk about. What should we mainly talk about?
Before, I briefly explained the concept of RTs and some of its basic gameplay.
But I did not completely separate out the abstract core of RTs.
More specifically, how do RTs determine winning or losing?
In fact, this is not complicated at all.
As long as your force survives to the end and you destroy all the enemy's buildings, you are the winner.
The core of the game revolves around combat.
In RTs games, players collect as many resources as possible, research military technology, and build armies with the ultimate goal of fighting other players or AI.
Doing your best to win is what it's all about.
So, if according to what I said before, each of us is a embodied RTs, then what is the whole meaning of us?
Please don't be so shy, I think communication and interaction is a good link.
Very good! Very good! You must have listened very carefully. Thank you for your words.
Yes, as the lady recounted.
The whole meaning of our lives is to seek happiness.
Of course, some people will say that some people are willing to sacrifice their own happiness to achieve higher ideals.
But what I want to say is that actually including this kind of dedication and sacrifice is also a kind of self-realization and the embodiment of self-happiness.
Specifically why I say this, I will leave it to my speech tomorrow night, where I will use an algorithm to discuss it in depth with you.
So today, just treat what I say as credible and reliable.
So if the pursuit of happiness is the same as RTs, is there such a process from base to upward?
So do I also need to fight and win like RTs to finally realize this meaning?
Hmm? Everyone?
Yes, it is obvious that everyone's opinions are not consistent. Why?
I think this depends on the difference between us and RTs games.
Everyone should still remember that I said at the beginning that in RTs games, any unit or equipment is absolutely subject to the commander's arrangements.
This is a rule determined by the underlying code.
But in reality, people have personal will. At least, this is the case today when we advocate humanism and advocate the supremacy of human rights.
Therefore, RTs mode can only exist in games, but cannot be easily reproduced in reality.
What's the reason?
Just like...
I started by saying that there was a crucial group in the early days of RTs games. Who were they?
Yes, "peasant", in fact, this is not just a joking name, but a concept that we all summarize in our daily lives.
That is, the basic producers or resource collectors of society.
They are the most basic disposable labor force and the basic component of the overall construction of society.
These basic components play a vital role in the early stages of the game, and their quantity and work efficiency also directly determine whether the game can progress to the next stage.