With the inversion of Hans' example, the next four examples are easy to understand.
Chimpanzees may indeed attack tourists for "entertainment". This seemingly meaningless behavior is actually a good reflection of their high intelligence and "emotions".
Because human beings will often engage in behaviors that are meaningless for survival and even harmful to health, but can make people feel happy.
The simplest one is like smoking.
There is currently no solid evidence in the world that smoking is beneficial to the human body. On the contrary, it is the main cause of lung cancer.
However, there are still many people around the world who smoke continuously every day. Are there "emotional" factors behind this behavior?
If not, then what makes humans choose to smoke? Is it a genetic habit caused by a father who smokes? Or behavioral imitation?
However, a survey report found that in most families where the father has a habit of smoking and drinking, his children will stay away from this bad habit because they have been disgusted with the family disharmony caused by this behavior since they were young.
It can be seen that whether it is a chimpanzee that does not throw stones at tourists in order to obtain food, or a bonobo that does not focus on reproduction as its main purpose but likes xxoo behaviors, it should be more or less equipped with some emotional factors, although we are not sure yet
, but at least humans who also behave this way have it.
Comparing KK who likes looking in the mirror with humans who dress up in front of the mirror every day, it is not difficult to find that maybe KK’s other behaviors are no different from ordinary cats, but it is already a very strange "emotion" if he is not unfamiliar with mirrors and does not reject them.
"Behave.
It cannot be said that it is a meaningless habit for us to dress ourselves up in front of the mirror in order to make ourselves look decent and beautiful.
Maybe KK likes to look in the mirror because it cares about the appearance of itself in the mirror. This is very subtle, but the researchers did not notice the changes in KK's eyes.
Although these are all jokes, they are also worth thinking about.
As for the rats that save their companions, perhaps a lot of evidence can show that this is a biological genetic selection, because only those groups that know how to save their fellow humans and pay attention to warnings can survive in the cruel natural environment, and those who choose food have long been eliminated.
.
But by analogy, when we encounter beggars on the way to work, what kind of behavior is our charity? Or what kind of mentality is our behavior?
If we follow the rat's algorithm, we give alms to others because we cannot ignore the "begging" voice of the beggar, or in other words, we must eliminate this "begging" so that it will not "annoy us" again.
Only if we are willing to pay, then our "good deeds" seem to have suddenly changed!
In fact, many people believe that charity is usually a disguised psychological display of superiority, just like the significance of lawns to humans. We plant lawns that do not produce food on fertile land not because we really
People like lawns, or lawns have other values, but because we express that we are rich through this behavior of "wasting" natural resources.
"Almsgiving" is also a condescending "rich" mentality, rather than a "helping" mentality.
In this way, our charity behavior not only changes its taste, but even becomes a bit disgusting.
But if this were not the case, without the rat selection formula, our behavior would become full of "emotion" and become
It has to be "humane".
On the contrary, if we accept the rat's selection formula, then we are a group of robots whose brains are programmed with binary codes and guide our behavior. Better algorithms tell us that there is no need to use our own resources to "give away" and we are destined to be rejected by society.
Inferior robots eliminated.
This idea is scary...but many people have fallen into it without knowing it.
Of course, this part is in a foreign language.
After talking about the rats, finally it’s Hachiko.
Hachiko's loyalty makes humans sigh and reflect, but if the algorithm on Hachiko is really true, then humans will definitely abandon it directly and skip the loyalty link.
Hachiko will not repeat the behavior of the previous day at sunrise the next day. It will make a better choice, that is, to show its kindness to a caring human being and hope that he can take him home. In this way, Hachiko will
The male will have "home", "food" and "master's love" again.
This is the optimal selection algorithm, which is exactly the same as the rat's "emotionless" algorithm.
In the human world, Hachiko-like loyalty is no longer common, but selection algorithms are more common.
If the "loyalty" algorithm is regarded as a dead end, the advantages of choosing an algorithm are obvious.
But what caused Hachiko's behavior at this time? Was it because Hachiko was not smart enough?
So in contrast, are many people in the human world who adopt the Hachiko algorithm also because they are not smart enough?
I think this is not the case. What really drives the "loyalty" result of the Hachiko algorithm is the "emotional" factor.
Those who are loyal and loyal people are not smart enough, but the "emotional" factor makes their actions meaningful.
The placement of Hachiko at the end of all five photos better reflects Zeng Yijie’s good intentions.
"Emotion is by no means meaningless, on the contrary, it is the greatest advantage of human beings!"
This is what Zeng Yijie wants to convey.
…
After demonstrating the significance of "emotion" to human beings, just as Zeng Yijie explained before, the important premise of whether "li-based life" exists and can be compared with human beings becomes obvious.
That is to prove that "Liji Life" has "emotional" factors.
But before that, Zeng Yijie also showed five graphic pictures.
The figures in these five pictures are: a circle, a sphere, three parallelograms parallel to each other in a three-dimensional structure, two opposite cones similar to funnels, and a point.
There are relatively few comments in this part, but it triggers no less thinking than the previous part of the argument for "emotional" factors.
First is the circle.
A circle in a two-dimensional plane is regarded as a ring, a surface, a range or "a door".
The concept of a ring is to take the edge of a circle, the concept of a surface is to refer to the internal composition of the edge, a range is relative to the whole picture, and "a door" is to see through the circle and see the three-dimensional world behind the two-dimensional plane.
Here, Zeng Yijie specifically noted that this part of the research conclusion was not completed by him alone, but was completed by all researchers in China and two spatial structure experts from Russia.
The first circle is a two-dimensional image that exists in the human world. Because we are in a higher dimension, we can see the multi-faceted states expressed by this two-dimensional image, and we can even extend it to a larger and broader one.
concept.
This includes doors.
When I mention "door", I obviously think of the "door" on Lake Don Juan.
So what is the connection between this door and this "circle"?
Zeng Yijie wrote this in his notes.
"We can abstractly extend a two-dimensional circle into the concept of a door because the three-dimensional world has a third element that does not exist in the two-dimensional world, that is, in addition to 'length and width', 'height', which is what constitutes
The most critical factor of three-dimensional graphics, based on it, the circle has the concept of door. Therefore, can we regard the 'door' on Don Juan Lake as a three-dimensional representation of a two-dimensional image? What does this two-dimensional existence look like?
What about?"
It can be seen from this passage that the first picture brings not a conclusion, but a question.
The state of presentation of a two-dimensional world existing in a three-dimensional world.
So here is the second picture.
A specific, spherical shape.
The spherical shape is not unfamiliar to most people. There are too many spherical objects in our daily lives.
Take basketball as an example. If I want to draw a basketball on paper, excluding color, texture and other details, what should we draw first?
Yes, it is a circle!
It can be seen that the expansion of a two-dimensional circle in the three-dimensional world is a spherical shape.
So if the ball is an ascending dimension expansion of a circle, then what is the expansion of the "door" on Lake Don Juan?
Some people may say that it is the expansion of a "door" figure.
In this regard, Zeng Yijie's team put forward a completely different view.
First of all, this is definitely not an expansion of the "door" graphic, because after the "door" graphic is expanded in the three-dimensional world, it can not only be presented as a "door" on Tang Juan Lake, but its more accurate expansion method should be an incomprehensible way.
Determine the length of the channel.
In other words, if it is really the expansion of the "door" in dimension, then we may see it from the front as a "door"-shaped structure, but from the side, we will see an endless passage.
This is a more reasonable expansion state.
Therefore, it is inaccurate to directly identify "Gate" as a two-digit "Gate" type expansion.
Hence the third picture.
Three parallelograms that are parallel to each other.
From a visual perspective, this picture is a bit like the three sections of a parallelogram cube, or the top, bottom and middle sections, but only if they exist in a parallel state.
At this time, there is a very special contact between the three-dimensional two-dimensional graphics and the three-dimensional world, that is, restrictive composition.
If we want to increase the dimensionality of the two-dimensional structure in the third picture, then the extension of these three two-dimensional figures will overlap, and at this time we can determine the start and end of the expansion.
It sounds like complicating a simple problem.
But in fact, this is a simplified description in the comments. Zeng Yijie also specifically added a link to a research report here, and specifically explained the in-depth analysis of the reverse dimensionality reduction of the "door" on Tang Juan Lake.
The only conclusion drawn from simplifying this research report is that Zeng Yijie's team unanimously believes that dimensionality reduction is definitely not simply taking photos of three-dimensional objects, because that only requires a mobile phone. Similarly, dimensionality enhancement
It's not just about expanding the circle into a ball.
Because the cross-section of sausages is also round, but most sausages are not made into a ball shape.