"What is a crime?" When the case was solved in the warehouse, the superiors were still arguing about the method of using killers to solve the case.
Although from the perspective of saving money, everything in the warehouse is wonderful, but from an ethical perspective, using murderers to solve crimes is definitely unacceptable to ordinary people. If it is exposed, I am afraid that the public will scold him to death.
Therefore, before the masses know the truth, the superiors must come up with an excuse. This requires scholars to discuss and prove that using criminals to solve the case is reasonable and in line with the historical process.
Now the higher-ups are asking scholars to debate. Scholars who support killer detectives believe that criminals who break through the bottom line of human morality are the most primitive state of human beings. It is with this primitive state that human beings stand out from the beasts.
"What is crime? Crime is the infringement of the interests of others for personal interests. But from a historical perspective, the history of mankind is the history of crime, but the crime model is that most people can infringe on the interests of a small number of people for their own interests. They constantly sacrifice the small
The interests of some people are the history of mankind. So I think that not only can heinous criminals be used to handle cases, but heinous criminals can even be used to rule the country." "Because these people will sacrifice a small number of people mercilessly and can be decisive in history.
People who make judgments at the expense of the few and gain the support of the majority are called heroes.”
"Nonsense, the hero will indeed sacrifice the minority, but it does not mean that he does not care about the minority. Making such a decision is an act of desperation at the time, not because the hero has no moral bottom line." Another scholar retorted.
However, scholars who support the killer detective are not worried at all: "But you also have to admit that both sides still have similarities, and the results are the same. If the humanistic feelings of the heroes are removed, a small number of people will be eliminated for the sake of social progress.
Isn't the way of ruling the "ideal world" that countless philosophers are flocking to; isn't the ruler who only makes correct decisions and will not be affected by moral interference the "philosopher king"?" "So I think these murderers have a very big influence.
Those who are valuable in research, especially those murderers who can complete major and important cases without changing their expressions, are of course unpardonable crimes for individuals, but they are precious treasures for all mankind."
Hearing him actually say that a cold-blooded killer is equal to the 'Philosopher King', many scholars looked at him angrily.
But as a ruler, sometimes you do need to be ruthless. Only in this way can you maintain the progress of society.
"This guy is really hateful." The girl also heard their discussion and hated the scholar who supported the killer. But even the experts couldn't refute it, and the girl certainly didn't have the knowledge to overturn the other party's argument.
"Actually, it's not that these experts can't refute it, it's just that empty talk about morality is unconvincing. After all, morality only stabilizes social order most of the time, and when society is in turmoil, strong people are needed to turn the tide. Not to mention the current situation between countries and collectives.
In competition with the collective and between individuals, morality is definitely not a necessary condition for victory, cold-blooded decision-making is."
"Is he really right?"
"It can't be said to be right, it just depends on what you believe. After all, human beings are still developing, and no one knows what will happen in the future. He said that cold-bloodedness is higher than morality, which is only a manifestation of certain stages in history, not
Throughout history, after all, there are many tyrants in history, and there is no praise for tyrants, let alone the future. What do you believe the future will be like?" Dulan guided slowly.
The girl opened her eyes wide but had no answer.
At this time, people who support the killer have proposed a future, which is to let the murderer rule the world, and use the murderer's lack of mercy to make judgments and sacrifice a few people, so as to quickly promote the operation of the world.
Of course, to achieve this, we must rely on the development of technology, and we cannot just rely on the brain of one murderer. At least the brains of two hundred brutal murderers must be formed into a brain pool, so that we can have a fairer judgment. But if only cold-blooded
Killers are never enough.
To be virtuous, one must also be virtuous.
Once we know the goal, we also need a method of operation. How can we judge who should be sacrificed and who should continue to contribute to society? This requires assistance from high technologies such as genes and mind detection. It is necessary to test out a certain aspect of human beings.
Judgment can be made only by the characteristics of the killer, rather than just relying on the killer's words.
In fact, many TV movies have such settings. For example, "Minority Report" has a way to predict other people's crimes. There are also common sci-fi settings of genetic selection, or "Psychometer" can measure everyone's genes.
Psychological index.
Only with this kind of science and technology and specific operations can the concept of "killers rule the country" be established.
It is precisely because of such a screening mechanism, coupled with a ruthless ruler, that society can run. Rather than having ruthless rulers, social development can be completed, otherwise there would not be so many in history.
A tyrant.
Du Lan told the girl: "What this man said makes sense, but he has forgotten which tyrant in history was not colder than a killer, and which tyrant cared about Bai Xiao's life and death? But in the era of tyrants, has society progressed rapidly? No.
, so it is not the killer who determines the operation of human society, but with the progress of human society, the Virgin Bitch and White Lotus have become a stumbling block to social progress, so everyone feels that a tyrant is needed. But in fact, even if a tyrant appears now,
There is no way for the tyrant to accurately distinguish between the White Lotus and the Virgin Bitch. At that time, there will only be indiscriminate attacks, and another Axis Power will appear. If science and technology develop in the future, the good and bad of human beings can be screened out at birth, then
Only then will the tyrant have the opportunity to display his talents." Duran said that even if the 'Philosopher King' appeared, the current social productivity would not allow his wisdom to be fully displayed.
The philosopher king is a thousand-mile horse, and productivity is Bole. Without Bole, there would be no thousand-mile horse.
The girl was thoughtful. After being with Dulan for a long time, the girl had to study hard to keep up with Dulan's pace. She was only fourteen, but now she has a special learning method, which is to enter the scholar's dream and let the scholar
Give her lessons. In this way, her knowledge level will continue to improve.
"But if productivity increases, do we really need a tyrant? Why not let a kind person be in power?" The girl is indeed very smart.
"Yes, this is the flaw of this expert. He thinks that only killers can complete the work. In fact, good people can also complete the task, but good people will hesitate. But as long as a good person has a normal IQ and can judge the pros and cons, he can also complete the task."
Of course, unless, like in "Psychological Measurement", the killer's brain is needed as a benchmark to judge other people's crime index, the killer's brain is necessary, otherwise it really doesn't mean that the killer is necessary. It can only be said that the killer can rule the country, and at the same time, the killer can be responsible.
If the blame comes, ordinary people don’t have to be responsible and risk being stigmatized.
The girl despised this expert even more: "Who is he? He talks like a castle in the air, but completely ignores the reality."
"This is philosophy. Philosophy always assumes an ideal state and rational people, so it is difficult to turn philosophy into experience. It can only be used as a general direction, not as a governing idea." Dulan told the girl that this is knowledge.
There is a huge gap between theory and practice.
The girl couldn't help but nod: "The knowledge learned by scholars comes from books, and the people who write books are also scholars. In this way, scholars are passed down from generation to generation. They have no chance to go deep into society. No wonder they are all castles in the air." "If I study in the future, I will definitely do it."
Read more books written by people who have been deeply involved in society." The girl believes that these books are not only wisdom but also experience.